RoseMontague
Published Author
Originally Posted by Katody Matrass View Post
Fulcanelli, in your opinion Rudy's DNA in Meredith's vagina was a result of consensual sex?
What a stupid question.
What a rude answer.
Originally Posted by Katody Matrass View Post
Fulcanelli, in your opinion Rudy's DNA in Meredith's vagina was a result of consensual sex?
What a stupid question.
Where do you find that?The store owner's testimony has been completely discredited.
What a stupid question.
Apparently one can write whatever one likes in a Motivation Report.
It seems you don't take anyone as a source if it is a source that favors innocence. That is too bad. I believe it and I won't forget it.
No he didn't
That's a load of complete rubbish made up by FOA Paul Ciolino. I notice Paul neglects to mention he was also working for the FOA as part as their campaign. That's despicable journalistic ethics.
Where's the quote from Giobbi? If he said it, why aren't they quoting his words?
I don't believe a damn thing 48 hours says about this case. All they have done is tell lie after lie after lie. It's interesting how many people seem to get suckered though.
So, unless you have a better source then Paul Ciolino and 48 hours and an actual quote from Giobbi, forget it.
He was spotted, as Guede knew, by a couple going the other way that he almost ran into. The court just ignored this evidence.
It's interesting that his story says he waited around the cottage before entering. You might get the notion that he was casing the joint.
I'm not going to take people that have told countless lies as sources...no.
I'm not going to take the FOA as a source, no. I'm not going to take people that have told countless lies as sources...no.
A comment in very poor taste, coupled with another smiley. We are talking about the murder of a young girl here.
As I understand it, Meredith's hyoid bone was broken which may have rendered her unable to resist the sexual assault. Presumably the stabbing came later?
Nit according to Raffaele.
Moreover, we know he didn't have sex with the victim. The sexual assault was digital.
We're not in an Italian court, we're on an internet forum. We don't have to wait for another verdict to opine that the recent one is worthless and erroneous. The motivation is on the web, everyone can see for themselves how ridiculous it's reasoning is.
That's bona fide circular reasoning. It's how the court of law "tested" the arguments what is under dispute.
I see you still believe Quintavalle's incredible memory. How do you cope with the discrepancies evidenced in the appeals? The fact that both the police and his coworker contradicted him?
It's not my comment, it's Rose'. It's she that was accusing Rudy of committing necrophilia. If you don't like it, I suggest you take it up with the source.
The shoe print at the end of the bed is him leaving the room.
Anyone could have put the knife on the bed.
I see nothing plausible about him sitting on the bed to take his shoes off to perform necrophilia.
Moreover, we know he didn't have sex with the victim. The sexual assault was digital.
Finally, if he'd just stabbed the victim, several times, you don't think he'd have blood on him already? You don't think he'd have blood on his hands which he's using to take off his pants which he...doesn't want to get blood on?
Doesn't logically stand up.
The store owner's testimony has been completely discredited.
I refer you to my previous statement regarding the appeals.
Not at all. You believe he didn't stabbed her. He tried to "help" her with the towels. maybe you believe he is innocent of this also?