The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Icke site is very precious about proof.

Precious in the sense of any old tut that is used to show, allegedly show that for example Paul McCartney is an android lookey likey replaced in 1965 for ........well whatever reason they say is accepted as 100% accurate and not debatable.

Whilst any cold, hard, well researched or evidenced proof that 100% shows that, for example, the Apollo Hoax is dingo poop of the highest order is always challenged, questioned and then ignored because it brings their flimsy sandcastle in the sky delusion crashing to the earth.

Because they only have 1 brain cell between the whole lot of them, currently being used by Merlincove to try and decide if there is some tenuous reason for banning steven1 again, they can't see that steven's approach is exactly what has been done to claim how FOTL is so good and really, really, honestly, cross my heart and hope to die, on my old mum's life works....but send me lots of money first before I can show you the proof.......of course I'm not in it for the money i'm for Freedom and the little man and a new way of life....but make sure you send me the money first.
 
currently being used by Merlincove to try and decide if there is some tenuous reason for banning steven1 again,

I dont know why they bother banning people, why with all the proxy servers available you cant really get rid of someone.
You would think they would just leave people to post under the same log on, better the devil you know after all.
 
That makes perfect sense. Obsessively monitoring a forum where you don't have the balls to post even though they're discussing you would be cowardly and stupid. Getting a friend to do it for you is totally and utterly different the same. Ya hear that, Rob's friend? He's a big girl's blouse. Pass that on to him.

Does anyone else think Rob's statement "I have a friend" requires a [citation needed] tag?
 
God, those guys are stupid. That is so transparently a piss-take...

Maybe I have vivid imagination and a sick sense of humour.

Imagine having a couple of freeman hitch-hikers, stopping for gas and a discrete phone call.
Next thing you get pulled over by a friend in uniform and you play out the sketch in Stene1's OP. :D

(Yes I know, finding a police officer who knows freloader lingo, is in on the joke, and happen to be around at the same time as the hitchhikers, is not likely)
 
Because they only have 1 brain cell between the whole lot of them, currently being used by Merlincove to try and decide if there is some tenuous reason for banning steven1 again, they can't see that steven's approach is exactly what has been done to claim how FOTL is so good and really, really, honestly, cross my heart and hope to die, on my old mum's life works....but send me lots of money first before I can show you the proof.......of course I'm not in it for the money i'm for Freedom and the little man and a new way of life....but make sure you send me the money first.

I am not a moderator, and even if I were, I would not have any authority to make a request of anyone where. That being said, I would like all of us to consider using fewer insults in this thread. The evidence speaks for itself and saying insulting things about FMOTL makes us look as if we are complaining because we have no valid criticism. In fact, our pointed, cogent, documented criticism is so overwhelming that insults dilute the message instead of making it stronger.
 
Precious in the sense of any old tut that is used to show, allegedly show that for example Paul McCartney is an android lookey likey replaced in 1965 for ........well whatever reason they say is accepted as 100% accurate and not debatable.

Not quite, it was the 6th of November 1966 when the shapeshifting inter-dimensional aliens replaced McCartney as part of their plot to disrupt the development of pop music, thus eliminating resistance to the Vietnam war and ultimately leading to World War 3 in 1970...............
 
I was stopped whilst traveling and was asked why I had no registration plate on the car.
I explained that I was a freeman on the land and that it wasn't a requirement to hand over my property to the DVLA.

DVLA implies the UK. Not showing a registration on your car isa non endorsable fixed penalty. Not having any Tax or insurance means the officer will take your car off you and have it impounded. You get it back when you can show insurance and tax on the vehicle.
He then ran my details through the police computer and it came back as "statutory legislation does not apply".

This is an out and out lie. A roadside check of the PNC will show an address and any outstanding warrants and any previous convictions. Nothing else.

He seemed confused but i explained about my notices that I had sent and he finally admitted that he knew all about it and was just playing dumb because most freeman make a mistake during the discussion and create joinder.

This also is an out and out lie
The police have now let me pass on a number off occasions since and just flash their lights and smile and give me a knowing wink.

Another lie, if they see a car with no reg plate they will stop it, ow are they to know he has a 'magic marker' against his name if they don't know who he is?

How can anyone believe this crap?

Even Menard calls him a liar.
 
Last edited:
DVLA implies the UK. Not showing a registration on your car isa non endorsable fixed penalty. Not having any Tax or insurance means the officer will take your car off you and have it impounded. You get it back when you can show insurance and tax on the vehicle.


This is an out and out lie. A roadside check of the PNC will show an address and any outstanding warrants and any previous convictions. Nothing else.



This also is an out and out lie


Another lie, if they see a car with no reg plate they will stop it, ow are they to know he has a 'magic marker' against his name if they don't know who he is?

How can anyone believe this crap?

Even Menard calls him a liar.
Isn't it sad how little confidence Menard has in his own teachings?
 
Last edited:
Isn't it sad how little confidence Menard has in his own teachings?

Well, exactly. They spend so long talking about the hypotheticals, but when someone shows up to say it worked exactly as the peddlers say it should, all of a sudden they're incredulous. "Steve"'s been really careful to tie his experiences to exactly what people like Menard say should happen, but stil, there's incredulity!

It shows they don't really believe this nonsense they spout after all. It shows this a game for most, and a con-trick for some.
 
World War 3 in 1970...............

I had my legs blown off in that war but strangely I find now that they have been replaced by exact duplicates!!~!
 
How can anyone believe this crap?

Even Menard calls him a liar.

Actually, no one believes that crap. As we have been saying, it is almost certainly a poster who made up a story as ridiculously short on evidence as any of the other FMOTL stories to see how the other board members would respond to it. I believe the English call it "taking the Mickey."
 
Last edited:
Actually, no one believes that crap. As we have been saying, it is almost certainly a poster who made up a story as ridiculously short on evidence as any of the other FMOTL stories to see how the other board members would respond to it. I believe the English call it "taking the Mickey."



Yes, and we should in fact be congratulating them on not being completely gullible. And then we should suggest that they be just as skeptical of Menard's claims, as he's posted exactly as much evidence of the efficacy of FOTL as Steven has, that being, none at all.

While it's good that they can see they're being lied to by a jokester who's having a laugh at them, it would be better if they could also see that they're being lied to by a fraudster, who's trying to make money off them.
 
While it's good that they can see they're being lied to by a jokester who's having a laugh at them, it would be better if they could also see that they're being lied to by a fraudster, who's trying to make money off them.

Aye, there's the rub.
 
Actually, no one believes that crap. As we have been saying, it is almost certainly a poster who made up a story as ridiculously short on evidence as any of the other FMOTL stories to see how the other board members would respond to it. I believe the English call it "taking the Mickey."


Quite, Steven1 is exquisitely exposing Menard as a total sham by claiming the same 'success' as Menard has. This compels the freemen to demand 'proof' & Steven1 can justifiably say 'well if Menard won't provide it I don't have to'.

It's actually quite subtle & an innovative method of making FMOTL look ludicrous.
 
Quite, Steven1 is exquisitely exposing Menard as a total sham by claiming the same 'success' as Menard has.

it would appear that steven1 has left Menard behind in his slipstream.
Steven1 has now "proved" that he has driven a car without it being registered, Rob hasn't got the bottle to get behind the wheel.
 
it would appear that steven1 has left Menard behind in his slipstream.
Steven1 has now "proved" that he has driven a car without it being registered, Rob hasn't got the bottle to get behind the wheel.

In Freemanland the first liar doesn't stand a chance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom