Gage Back to His Incessant Lying.

cooperman said:
The stupidity on this site never ceases to amaze me.

I DO NOT believe there was a pyroclastic flow. The point is that some proponents of the official story seem to be claiming that wtc1 hit 7 with the force of a volcano. It didn't, of course. They are lying, but then they do that a lot.

Reading the phrase pyroclastic flow just reminded me of the programme I had seen.
Click to expand...

If you wish to decrease the stupidity on this forum, please withdraw your membership here.

HYPERBOLE....look it up.

TAM:)
 
cooperman said:
He is very popular. He always gets a good crowd. I expect he was grateful that you came.

Did you have to pay to get in?
Click to expand...

He couldn't get 80 people in that church. He did boast on his website that there were over 100 until he was called on that and eventually changed the numbers. Was he grateful? Well, they got 40 bucks total from the 2 of us. He also thanked me for "being a good sport."
 
tsig said:
Being gutted beforehand and having critical columns weakened.
Click to expand...

oh yah, I forgot those.

Also, a group of Demolition Experts going around the gutted building planting the explosives.

TAM:D
 
cooperman said:
He is very popular. He always gets a good crowd. I expect he was grateful that you came.

Did you have to pay to get in?
Click to expand...
Yes we did. Mr Herbert and I both paid $10.

You should go to his show sometime, it will give you some interesting insight into his "head counts"

:rolleyes:
 
I'd say that this "show" that cooperman claims he saw and bases so much on, is probably a lie... I surely don't trust his word because considering how much i see these 911 kooks tell lies, it's impossible to trust a word they say.
 
Last edited:
cooperman said:
The stupidity on this site never ceases to amaze me.

I DO NOT believe there was a pyroclastic flow. The point is that some proponents of the official story seem to be claiming that wtc1 hit 7 with the force of a volcano. It didn't, of course. They are lying, but then they do that a lot.

Reading the phrase pyroclastic flow just reminded me of the programme I had seen.
Click to expand...

Was this documentary released by NIST?

You're correct. There seems to be a never ending flow of stupidity when truthers present their "arguments" here.
 
cantonear1968 said:
Did that help with making sense of his presentation?
Click to expand...
Not one little bit. The funny thing is he's not all that good of a speaker. I've seen lots of different people present some of the most bizarre things (I remember someones "pyramid power" talk way back when that left me looking up all sorts of things). The thing is, unless you already want to believe Gage is not going to convince you. He's definitely set-up to "preach to the choir".
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
No Problem.

Lack of a SEQUENCE (repeated, roughly equal time between each) of many loud explosions just prior to collapse.

Lack of a SEQUENCE (see above) of many bright flashes from the windows etc...just prior to collapse.

Lack of conventional explosive (those used in classic CD) det cord or residue at the scene post collapse.

Lack of witnesses stating that there were people accessing the areas where the columns were on a regular basis to plant/prep the columns for take down.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Lack of glass raining down on lower manhattan when the explosives went off, since the windows weren't removed first.
 
cooperman said:
Funny you should mention pyroclastic flows.

I watched a documentary yesterday that was non-conspiracy and was about the new wtc7 being built. Not only did they fail to show a video of the collapse when they discussed it but they said the collapse was caused by "debris from the wtc1 collapse hitting 7 with the force of a volcano". That is a direct quote,.

Is that the official story now?
Click to expand...

Was it "peer reviewed" by anyone with a dictionary?
 
phunk said:
Lack of glass raining down on lower manhattan when the explosives went off, since the windows weren't removed first.
Click to expand...

well exactly...as was pointed out by NIST when they reviewed the likelihood (or lack there of) of blast events.

TAM:)
 
DGM said:
Not one little bit. The funny thing is he's not all that good of a speaker. I've seen lots of different people present some of the most bizarre things (I remember someones "pyramid power" talk way back when that left me looking up all sorts of things). The thing is, unless you already want to believe Gage is not going to convince you. He's definitely set-up to "preach to the choir".
Click to expand...

I don't know. The box drop almost had me!!!!
 
cooperman said:
I just noticed the thread title describes gage's lies as "incessant". So, where are they all? Can anyone list the lies?
Click to expand...
Yes, Gage tell lies continuously; you missed them? Why can't you figure it out?
thermite - big lie, as an insane lie.
Gage is a liar, if you can't find the lies this is why you have failed to figure out 911 for 9 years.

Gage has a canned presentation of lies, he is a fraud who lives off of lies; it is his job to lie. What does the idiot Gage think about 77 and 93? What a dolt - the only thing he does right, take fools money; they deserve to loose their money for not trying to think for themselves.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Yes we did. Mr Herbert and I both paid $10.

You should go to his show sometime, it will give you some interesting insight into his "head counts"

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


You paid to go see him? You must really like his work. I would like to thank you for helping to fund the truth movement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom