Gage Back to His Incessant Lying.

T.A.M. said:
Please see my post above. If you wish to go with this, then Cooperman could argue, that as a member of the truth movement (I assume), that you and others are insulting him personally every time you mock or name call them (such as referring to it as the twoof movement, or saying "truthers are idiots").

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Agreed. I don't think generalizations need to be classified as personal attacks. But I was just pointing to what I thought Chewy was getting at.

However, IIRC, I believe he called Dave Rogers or DGM a liar at some point. Don't know if that's considered a "personal attack" or not...

EDIT: It was directed at Dave, here:
*********************************
Dave Rogers said:
No, it refers to Gage's "incessant lying". Incessantly repeating a single lie, which is what Gage does, falls nicely within that category.
Click to expand...
cooperman said:
So gage has only told one lie. That isn't good, but he is doing better than you.
Click to expand...
*********************************

Kinda borderline if you ask me, but it wasn't directed at me so my opinion isn't really worth anything in this case.
 
Last edited:
sabretooth47 said:
Agreed. I don't think generalizations need to be classified as personal attacks. But I was just pointing to what I thought Chewy was getting at.

However, IIRC, I believe he called Dave Rogers or DGM a liar at some point. Don't know if that's considered a "personal attack" or not...
Click to expand...

If it is then there are at least 20 posters here who have called me a liar. It will be interesting to find out if I am able to report those as personal attacks.
 
cooperman said:
If it is then there are at least 20 posters here who have called me a liar. It will be interesting to find out if I am able to report those as personal attacks.
Click to expand...

You can report anything you like. The mods are very fair. You could look at the public notices if you wish.
 
sabretooth47 said:
Agreed. I don't think generalizations need to be classified as personal attacks. But I was just pointing to what I thought Chewy was getting at.

However, IIRC, I believe he called Dave Rogers or DGM a liar at some point. Don't know if that's considered a "personal attack" or not...

EDIT: It was directed at Dave, here:
*********************************


*********************************

Kinda borderline if you ask me, but it wasn't directed at me so my opinion isn't really worth anything in this case.
Click to expand...
I don't remember him ever calling me a "liar".
 
cooperman said:
If it is then there are at least 20 posters here who have called me a liar. It will be interesting to find out if I am able to report those as personal attacks.
Click to expand...
You think the WTC terrorists attack and collapse was a controlled demolition, that is a lie, and you support that lie. Does that make you a liar?

You can't find lies in Gage's work, that is a lie or you are not capable of figuring out Gage is a liar. You weakly support Gage, and Gage is a liar. Why can't you figure out Gage is a liar?

If you think thermite was part of the CD of the WTC you believe in lies.

Why would anyone call you a liar? Gage is a liar, easy to see, why do you try to support him so poorly?
 
cooperman said:
If it is then there are at least 20 posters here who have called me a liar. It will be interesting to find out if I am able to report those as personal attacks.
Click to expand...

Anything considered provable is usually tolerated, if proven. Liar, as a rule, is not considered severe enough, from what I have seen on both sides, to be a violation of that rule.

TAM:)
 
cooperman said:
If it is then there are at least 20 posters here who have called me a liar. It will be interesting to find out if I am able to report those as personal attacks.
Click to expand...

Trying to pull 1 of those classic Jason Bermas statements on us?:

Jason Bermas: "I'm not calling anyone a liar, I'm calling you a liar, sir!"

Calling people a "liar" isn't a personal attack.
 
cooperman said:
Agreed.

He clearly wants me to make personal attacks so he can report them. Shame he will be diappointed.
Click to expand...

If you believe that I'm "egging" you on, you're sadly mistaken. You've completely ignored post #113.

I said & let me make it very clear to you:

You know which ones, don't play dumb here. Everyone knows how you Truthers get all emotional when you've been proven wrong.
Click to expand...

When you Truthers get proven wrong on this forum, you people have lost your sense of self control when proven wrong.
 
Last edited:
cooperman said:
Are you saying that nobody heard loud cracks just before wtc7 collapsed? You know what will happen next...
Click to expand...

Oh good grief. btw, if what you say was actually true, why can't Gage pay a competent CD company to produce a report which supports his false claims?

Oh... because they're false. So he doesn't bother trying.
He's a charlatan; a fake, and his claims are as phony as anything I've seen.

 
cooperman said:
One person reporting it does not mean only one person heard it.

What was the exclusion area around wtc7?
Click to expand...

Oh for goodness sake.

You dont need to have such a hard time trying to find demolition explosions, go watch some its always obvious. Its so obvious that they have a perimeter and still microphones distort because its so damn loud.

All 3 collapses were captured from various angles and none show any explosions sounds, get over it. Go back to arguing it was nano-thermite so didnt need any explosions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom