No proof has been offered, outside of you making a claim,
What on earth are you talking about, Djlunacee? This thread is about the proof put forward by Dr. Judy Wood, with links all over the place to where the proof can be found.
no Jammonious, it is not a fallacy to ask for more proof,
I really don't understand how people in this thread can let you get away with the above statement without sending you a PM or posting up a correction. Based on how frequently it is used, have you no recollection of the phrase "
moving the goal post"? I believe that phrase has been used 100s of times.
That is the way the "demand more proof" fallacy is usually referred to as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalpost
all you have done is make an erroneous claim, and when asked to prove tha claim, you refuse to engage in conversation, that is rich.
No it is not rich. My approach is the logically proper approach in dealing with fallacious assertions. I am not here to participate in the fallacies put forward by posters, let alone gotcha games, wild goose chases or other mechanisms that serve to set up dumb control games.
Posters won't readily admit it, but what they are seeking to do is to be able to use what I post against me, literally to say "gotcha." That is a game. It has no meaning and does not advance the state of the discussion. Instead, it retards it.
I will not ever play such games. I do not initiate them and I do not participate in them.
Again, how can you claim proof of something when you won't even define what it is? Sorry, I am not a child, and the "because I said so" routine doesn't work here.
That is a clever twist; but, your construct is not an adequate, let alone accurate description of what I do.
For the most part, you have not at all addressed yourself to the proof put forward by Dr. Wood. That proof is the issue. Please consider dealing with it.
As has been shown in this as well as numerous other threads, you are ignorant to real evidence, it isn't going away Jammonious.
I am not ignorant to real evidence. That is the kind of evidence I post.
The only directed energy weapons used that day were planes, big jumbo jet airliners, this has been proven in a court of law,
That is false, unsubstantiated and indicative of numerous fallacious attributes.
this is where all of the evidence points, there is not one shred of evidence that points elsewhere to some imaginary energy weapon.
That is false and has not ever been reliably proven by any governmentally funded investigative effort. Not ever. Further, the debunker websites that seek to compile references to some claim or other sourced to stupid newspapers, among other improper sources, does not constitute proof of anything. Instead, such efforts are harmful propaganda exercises.
One more time for sake of clarity:
The proof of DEW as a causal factor in the destruction of the WTC complex on 9/11, put forward by Dr. Judy Wood, is the only authentic, thorough and documented analysis of what destroyed the WTC complex to be found in the public record at a proper governvmental website.
The only one.
