Jesus Mary and Joseph... how'd the damn "GZ is flat" bogosity get resurrected again?
Bogosity? Excellent word. I shall use it often
Jesus Mary and Joseph... how'd the damn "GZ is flat" bogosity get resurrected again?
You probably mean the exchange quoted below from a Jim Fetzer webcast show way back ("Non-Random Thoughts" November 11 2006)
During the interview Dr. Judy states that a directed energy weapon destroyed the WTC complex. Fetzer wonders whether the DEW was concealed in WTC7? Jim is almost orgasmic when Judy corrects him by insisting that, rather, the weapon was in "geostationary" orbit:-
Hilarious audio snippet....HERE
Compus
The above quote is interesting for what it says and for what it implies. It implies that our Alienentity, a frequent poster of photographsd elsewhere in this forum if memory serves me correctly, has an enduring fascination for wanting to take a look at what destroyed the WTC complex, but is hesitant to do so. Hence, the "peak-a-boo" approach of "glancing" at an interview; and, "revisiting" footage out of curiosity.A lovely example of serial misinterpretation of reality
I have seen the interview previously, and just glanced at it to refresh my memory. Yup, Dr. Wood is still making no sense at all, just like the first time I viewed it....
Look, Alienentity, "are you in or are you out?" If you're in, you might as well dive in completely and stop the tap-dancing around the subject. Yes, the common storyline is false; and, yes, there exists no officially funded determination of the forensics of destruction; and, yes, directed energy weaponry are a causal factor in the destruction.
Yawn.... Jammy, Judy is almost completely incompetent at photographic analysis. Sorry dude.... her conclusions are barking mad, bordering on stupidly insane.
When their secrets are uncovered, you will then learn what terms theyhave come up with to describe the lethality effects of DEW.
Yes, I'll have to wait until the Hollywood movie of this fiction comes out. Maybe it'll be Tom Cruise playing the hero in your screen fantasy - that's what it is, a piece of science fiction...not science.
You act as if you do not even know that DEW are secret and that Dr. Wood was required to invent a new way of speaking about effects that were not obtainable absent use of energy weaponry.
Dr Wood chooses to mislabel everything because she isn't capable of accepting the reality of what it is. thus, the debris falling from the towers morphs into a Woodsian 'snowball' and loses its meaning.
She hasn't got a clue what she's rambling about, Jammy. Dust being kicked up by footfalls, or the wind becomes 'fuming'. It's both comical and sad at the same time.
She deals with that issue in the beginning part of her book.
what you cannot do is rely on any authoritative forensic determination that refutes Dr. Wood's interpretation as her interpretation is the only one that is published. Dr. Wood is a materials engineering scientist. You, on the other hand, are not understood to have that kind of expertise, talented though you may be in your chosen field.
Wrong. I can and do rely on proper forensic determination that refutes her nonsense. Including refuting her many claims about Hurricane Erin which are false and incompetent.
ps, she does not have expertise in most of the things she is pursuing. Shall I name a few?
Structural Engineering
Forensics
Fire Science
Aviation
Directed Energy Weapons
Meteorology
That's just a start.
cheers and enjoy your whackadoodle delusions!
I think we have to be fair to Judy, guys. She did say that she wasn't comfortable speculating too much on this. Lord knows those are two things that do not mix: Judy & Speculation!
Thanks for sharing that clip. Great stuff. I haven't been this entertained on a forum in.... forever! I haven't even gone into the hurricane stuff yet (aside from seeing pictures on her site). That should be fun too.
I do hope you will take an interest in a serious discussion of "Where Did the Towers Go?"
Sounds good. Do enjoy. Perhaps your new found bliss will result in more balanced posting concerning Dr. Wood?![]()
Let us assume for the moment the above is your pre-Switzerland outlook and not your post-Switzerland take on things.
You presume too much.