• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

dave rogers said:
that there is no evidence presented in favour of this claim, therefore it is meritless and needs no addressing.

Dave

eta: I could just as easily claim it was a coded message to reptilian aliens from the planet zarg offering them 10% discount on sun-loungers at wal-mart. How do you debunk that?
Click to expand...



:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

That's about as plausible as their other ideas.
 
Last edited:
I get it. This website isn't about debunking but about some game for your own amusement. Well, game over.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I may not have presented solid evidence for a cover-up, yet to say that the President of the United State of America was saying foolish things publicly because he for some reason had become a nutcase doesn't sound plausible to me.
Click to expand...

Nobody's saying he was a nutcase. It's far more likely that he had a memory of hearing that a plane had crashed into the WTC, saw a TV transmission some time later, and conflated the two memories, which is quite a common mental error.

Anders Lindman said:
American presidents don't just blurt out random crazy thoughts. They have well thought through beforehand prepared statements.
Click to expand...

Bush is famous for blurting out random crazy thoughts.

But all this is irrelevant. Even if we accepted that we don't know why Bush said what he said, where is your evidence that his statement was a coded message to the US government that they were to co-operate with a cover-up of the real events of 9/11?

Nobody's going to debunk anything if there's nothing to debunk.

Dave
 
Last edited:
Dave Rogers said:
My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.
A well thought through, beforehand prepared statement?
Dave
Click to expand...


He was, of course, joking there. Another:-

"I have left orders to be awakened at any time in case of national emergency - even if I'm in a Cabinet meeting".

But his slips were better, including: "All the waste in a year from a nuclear power plant can be stored under a desk".


Whatever. The man was class.

(SEE HERE)

Compus
 
Anders Lindman said:
I get it. This website isn't about debunking but about some game for your own amusement. Well, game over.
Click to expand...

It's about neither.

The JREF forum isn't a "debunking" site. That tends to happen here rather a lot, but it isn't what the site is about. The JREF is dedicated to rational, logical, skeptical thinking, not debunking. Because of the nature of the site, though, a lot of stupid ideas are brought forth, and lots of debunking occurs.

Anders, if you're looking for someone to debunk your beliefs before you admit that they are wrong, you're going to be waiting for a long time. No one has debunked anything you have presented because you haven't presented anything that can be debunked. You've given idle speculation. There's no debunking going on because that doesn't need to be debunked. Because it has no supporting evidence, it is essentially self-debunking.

If you want to see some debunking, present some evidence. Other than that, you're not going to get anything beyond what you've already got - just more demands for evidence.
 
You see, I don't mind debating people, even crazy people, but nothing chaps my hide more than some irrational ideologue claiming that everybody else is just a mindless automaton blindly accepting whatever is given to them, and he somehow is above all that and knows the real "truth".

Sheesh, Anders. I liked you better when you were polite and crazy. Now you're all uppity and such.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I get it. This website isn't about debunking but about some game for your own amusement. Well, game over.
Click to expand...

Why are you asking us to debunk YOUR theories? If you would take the time to research, and study the events of the day, you would realize that the claim of video fakery is absolute nonsense, and to say there were no planes used is absurd. Basically what I am saying is, if you are not willing to do the work, why should we?
 
When Truthers come to this forum & make accusations, allegations & false information about 9/11, there isn't anything better in the world than to have that kind of amusement to stimulate the brain.

I mean, if we didn't have people who thought differently, we'd be up a creek without a paddle. But then there's the evidence about 9/11 not being an "Inside Job". That requires research & studying, which Truthers fail to do.

I like this site, it's fun, exciting & educational. We'll hardly know what's going to come around the corner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom