Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

[Bell]

Yea, I guess that's true. One can debate crazy people, even if it's just for entertainment's sake.

You didn't see what I did there

 

[DGM]

You didn't see what I did there

Maybe he did!

 

[twinstead]

You didn't see what I did there

Oh yes he di'id

 

[jammonius]

I'm guessing you missed (ie: ignored) my post #478:

No, your guess is wrong. Your post does not require a response because it is a strawperson. You haven't posted anything that Dr. Wood has claimed. You are arguing with yourself.

Now, with that said, and consistent with the request for more collaborative, less confrontational posting, what I will say is this:

Dr. Wood uses the terminology "Star Wars" as a reference to the origin of the intensive effort to develop DEW. That is the phrase used by then President Reagan.

It does not impart a statement as to where the DEW that did the WTC complex in were situated.

Instead, the evidence that Dr. Wood has posted does imply vertical destruction based on the evidence of the holes in WTC 4,5,6 and in various places in the flat GZ. You have to look for this information at drjudywood.com.

But, while vertical holes implies destruction from above, that is not necessarily from orbit.

See, for instance, the statement of actual 0/11 eyewitness, Patricia Ondrovic, that describes seeing in the sky flying objects that very closely matches the video of DEW demonstrations, all as posted elsewhere:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6300733&postcount=484

In addition, I have frequently posted a reference to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS), and to their publication entitled WAVE FRONT. The very first volume of that publication boasts, back in 1999, of DEW being deployed in space, in the air, at all altitudes, on land and at sea.

Look it up.

I really don't think it useful for me to spoon feed posters here. If you are interested in DEW capabilities and the MIC companies that are manufacturing them, then do, by all means, have at it.

I support the claims I make to my satisfaction. I am not here posting to your satisfaction. Satisfy yourself as to the truth or falsity of the DEW proposition. I will comment, but I will not answer rhetoric. Ever.

 

[DGM]

Yes, screen grabs would be useful. Please post visual proof if and when you rely on them to make claims. You have to upload your jpgs to some sort of hosting site, like photobucket, otherwise you get nailed for 'hot linking.' Once you upload to a free host site, you can then post your images here using the "Insert image" button.

I look forward to your visual posting.

Once I "upload my JPEG's to photobucket"! I don't know you that well.




Why don't you just watch the video. Besides, in my over half century on this earth I only have so many "new tricks" left to learn. I don't want to waste them on "technology". (I don't "text" either).

 

[twinstead]

I support the claims I make to my satisfaction. I am not here posting to your satisfaction. Satisfy yourself as to the truth or falsity of the DEW proposition. I will comment, but I will not answer rhetoric. Ever.

I commend your being true to yourself, but you are making the same declarations any cult member would make. Just because you may think you are right doesn't mean you are.

 

[beachnut]

...
I really don't think it useful for me to spoon feed posters here. If you are interested in DEW capabilities and the MIC companies that are manufacturing them, then do, by all means, have at it.

I support the claims I make to my satisfaction. I am not here posting to your satisfaction. Satisfy yourself as to the truth or falsity of the DEW proposition. I will comment, but I will not answer rhetoric. Ever.

The DEW theory is insane.

If you can't specify the energy required, you have failed. Judy, being an engineer can calculate the energy, if not then she is insane. DEW is insanity, and the fact you can't do physics and math is exposed since you believe Judy's nonsense.

Each time you post support of DEW weapons doing 911, you expose your ignorance on the issue.

If you can't specify the energy, then Judy is a fraud. Judy is a fraud. Her claims are only evidence she might be insane. How dumb does a person have to be to believe Judy's insane claims?

 

[excaza]

You can make it larger and easily make a determination.
I want you to do this yourself. It's called learning.

Your welcome.

You can't prove it's not a dollhouse.

 

[CompusMentus]

Did she say it didn't she say it?

I repeat what I first posted here in post #167

Nov 2006 Non-Random Thoughts radio show hosted by Jim Fetzer. Guest: Judy Wood, Caller: Troy from West Virginia. A recording of the show is easily available. Google it if you dare :=]

(Earlier in the show Judy had qualified the following by stating that the DEW was based in "geostationary orbit")

Troy: Were you saying that from outer space they were sending in
lasers to cut a few buildings? I understand you right?

Jim Fetzer: That looks as though that is the most probable explanation given
the data that Judy has been examining.

Troy: Lasers? You said lasers from space?

Judy Wood: No, no I'm saying energy, an energy beam, a beam of energy.

Jim Fetzer: I used the phrase laser.....

Troy: Energy beams or lasers from space?

Judy: Yes.

Compus

 

[twinstead]

Yea. Judy's bat crap crazy.

 

[DGM]

You can't prove it's not a dollhouse.

Well actually I can.
I could tell you who took the picture (he would corroborate my story) and I could give you the names of the people that survived the collapse in that very spot.

Would that work for you?

 

[excaza]

Well actually I can.
I could tell you who took the picture (he would corroborate my story) and I could give you the names of the people that survived the collapse in that very spot.

Would that work for you?

They're all in on it!

 

[Sabretooth]

No, your guess is wrong. Your post does not require a response because it is a strawperson. You haven't posted anything that Dr. Wood has claimed. You are arguing with yourself.

Now, with that said, and consistent with the request for more collaborative, less confrontational posting, what I will say is this:

Dr. Wood uses the terminology "Star Wars" as a reference to the origin of the intensive effort to develop DEW. That is the phrase used by then President Reagan.

It does not impart a statement as to where the DEW that did the WTC complex in were situated.

Instead, the evidence that Dr. Wood has posted does imply vertical destruction based on the evidence of the holes in WTC 4,5,6 and in various places in the flat GZ. You have to look for this information at drjudywood.com.

But, while vertical holes implies destruction from above, that is not necessarily from orbit.

See, for instance, the statement of actual 0/11 eyewitness, Patricia Ondrovic, that describes seeing in the sky flying objects that very closely matches the video of DEW demonstrations, all as posted elsewhere:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6300733&postcount=484

In addition, I have frequently posted a reference to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS), and to their publication entitled WAVE FRONT. The very first volume of that publication boasts, back in 1999, of DEW being deployed in space, in the air, at all altitudes, on land and at sea.

Look it up.

I really don't think it useful for me to spoon feed posters here. If you are interested in DEW capabilities and the MIC companies that are manufacturing them, then do, by all means, have at it.

I support the claims I make to my satisfaction. I am not here posting to your satisfaction. Satisfy yourself as to the truth or falsity of the DEW proposition. I will comment, but I will not answer rhetoric. Ever.

Your implication of me using a strawman is wrong. The logistics of such a DEW powerful enough to destroy the WTC is completely relevant to the conversation. Regardless to the fact that JW is insanely claiming that there is no doubt a DEW was used despite not admitting the mode of implementation, she DOES imply on more than one occasion that the WTC was destroyed from top down as she points out holes in the ground and vertical destruction. Read her caption of Fig. 28:

Figure 28. The tower is being peeled downward. Dark explosions shoot up, while white ones explode outward. Above the white explosions the building has vanished while the lower part awaits termination.

Top down destruction must come from up top. Seeing that no one, anywhere, ever, mentioned a large flying UFO directly above the WTC, the only logical recourse is to assume this weapon was initiated from some level of earth orbit. Therefore, my argument stands and it deserves a legitimate response.

You claim you are only “sharing info” or whatever it is your pretending to do…but it’s all nonsense. You, nor Judy, can say DEW until the end of time…but it doesn’t bring such a fantasy into reality. You may as well claim rogue-Jedi cut down the WTC using lightsabers and the force.

 

[CompusMentus]

Your implication of me using a strawman is wrong.

He didn't imply it sabre he outright accused you of it.

His position is that Judy Wood has never stated that a geostationary space beam weapon was employed on 9/11. That isn't true, as I proved above. It's just a further few shovelfuls dug out the hole he's in.



Compus

 

[Sabretooth]

He didn't imply it sabre he outright accused you of it.

His position is that Judy Wood has never stated that a geostationary space beam weapon was employed on 9/11. That isn't true, as I proved above. It's just a further few shovelfuls dug out the hole he's in.



Compus

Thanks, Compus. I guess I was just trying to be civil

 

[DGM]

They're all in on it!

That's enough out of you!!!!!! Your from my "neck of the woods", I'll find you and kick your ass (or buy you a beer and we can laugh at the "truthers" together)!

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Jam's got a classic case of South Parks "Chewbacca Defense" about those non-existant DEW's.

Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.

DEW's that don't exist certainly doesn't make sense if you wanted to take down 3 massive buildings in broad daylight & assume that the planes weren't used for the attacks.

Jam doesn't make sense at all! DEW's don't exist, you must acquit!

 

[excaza]

That's enough out of you!!!!!! Your from my "neck of the woods", I'll find you and kick your ass (or buy you a beer and we can laugh at the "truthers" together)!

I figured I'd prep you for Mr. Lephart's word salad novel by providing a one line summary.

 

[Bell]

I figured I'd prep you for Mr. Lephart's word salad novel by providing a one line summary.

It's Leaphart

 

[djlunacee]

Calling all fallacy vigilantes. The above is atrociously fallacious and adds nothing of substance to this thread, I am afraid.

That said, maybe it is time to leave well enough alone. I am unwilling to go around and around in circles.

I note, however, that there has not been any attempt to refute the claims concerning building mass, lack of height of the remnant debris, let alone the stunningly effective visual proof of just how massive and close together were WTC 1,2,3.

See the evidence: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6391178&postcount=481

It's all here for those who wish to see, to do so.

And circles is exactly what you will keep doing until you further the discussion by answering the questions.
But, it seems Compus has already got one answered for me, thanks Compus!

So now that Judy Wood has defined the position from which the energy beam was fired, we can then ask this question, Since we are not the only country with sattelites in orbit, how did the Chinese or Russians, or any other country with satelites orbiting the earth not notice this big honkin DEW sitting on top of one of ours?

See Jammy, this is the point where the lenses on your rose colored glasses start to crack, your beloved Judy Wood admits that she believes the DEW was fired from geostationary orbit, quite the conundrum, or pickle Judy has put you in.