Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

[GlennB]

However, even as shown, your photo simply confirms the flatness of GZ and the total absence of 242 stories of building consisting in WTC 1,2 and 3.

That's because it's an overhead photo. Take an overhead of the Himalayas and they will appear flat.

Nevertheless, I notice you have not addressed the presence of a large amount of steel there. Undustified. Why is that? Do you prefer blanket denial to addressing real issues?

Meanwhile:

And these photos are, of course, well into the cleanup phase.

The fact that Judy Wood prefers only to show photos of layers of dust in nearby streets should tell you that there's something she is trying to hide, as these photos were also available to her. She has fooled herself and, it seems, fooled you too.

 

[carlitos]

http://www.thunderbolts.info/home.htm

 

[jammonius]

That's because it's an overhead photo. Take an overhead of the Himalayas and they will appear flat.

That is false.

Nevertheless, I notice you have not addressed the presence of a large amount of steel there. Undustified. Why is that? Do you prefer blanket denial to addressing real issues?

Your photo is misleading for obvious reasons, GlennB. It is not worthy of the standards applicable to this thread and is a far cry below the level that Dr. Wood has adhered to in presenting proof that DEW destroyed the WTC complex.

Meanwhile:

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/tallrubblepile-1.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/WTC1debrispile.jpg[/qimg]

The fact that Judy Wood prefers only to show photos of layers of dust in nearby streets should tell you that there's something she is trying to hide, as these photos were also available to her. She has fooled herself and, it seems, fooled you too.

You are, in fact, blatantly incorrect:

Flat as a pancake; and, note the confirmation that it was on 9/11/01, before 5:21PM, as WTC 7 can be seen standing in the background, right next to the flat expanse.

 

[jammonius]

http://www.thunderbolts.info/home.htm

Carlitos,

Thank you. Am I to take pride here that you appear to be paying attention; or, did you post the link to Thunderbolts on a basis other than my mentioning it in my reply to Myriad?

As or right now, I'm flattered

 

[GlennB]

That is false.

You are, in fact, blatantly incorrect:

Flat as a pancake;

Ah well. You are delusional, but I thought I'd have a try with some visual evidence.

 

[carlitos]

Carlitos,

Thank you. Am I to take pride here that you appear to be paying attention; or, did you post the link to Thunderbolts on a basis other than my mentioning it in my reply to Myriad?

While I don't normally respond to your posts, I thought it worth pointing out that some more of your information on science was from a website that rejects science. Not surprising really, given the title of the thread.

“Today, nothing is more important to the future and credibility of science than liberation from the gravity-driven universe of prior theory. A mistaken supposition has not only prevented intelligent and sincere investigators from seeing what would otherwise be obvious, it has bred indifference to possibilities that could have inspired the sciences for decades.”

 

[Bell]

Ah well. You are delusional, but I thought I'd have a try with some visual evidence.

I have no words...

Jerry Leaphart, you really need help!

 

[Chorduroy]

Wow, I had never looked at Judy Wood's site before, and I have to say, I thought she was a crackpot before I spent some time on drjudywood.com.

Now, having spent a few minutes familiarizing myself with her theories, I can say with complete confidence that I KNOW she is a crackpot.

 

[Sabretooth]

That is false.



Your photo is misleading for obvious reasons, GlennB. It is not worthy of the standards applicable to this thread and is a far cry below the level that Dr. Wood has adhered to in presenting proof that DEW destroyed the WTC complex.



You are, in fact, blatantly incorrect:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/album3/search2.jpg[/qimg]

Flat as a pancake; and, note the confirmation that it was on 9/11/01, before 5:21PM, as WTC 7 can be seen standing in the background, right next to the flat expanse.

I think you need to get your monitor fixed...or eyes checked...or head checked...or all three...

That image you keep throwing around looks to be taken at an upward angle...and it STILL shows some rather tall piles of debris.

Do better.

 

[Nonpareil]

That is false.

No, it's not. May I introduce you to Google Earth?

Your photo is misleading for obvious reasons, GlennB. It is not worthy of the standards applicable to this thread and is a far cry below the level that Dr. Wood has adhered to in presenting proof that DEW destroyed the WTC complex.

Obvious handwaving. I - and everyone else here, I am sure - fail to see the problem with the photo. Care to explain your problem with it?

You are, in fact, blatantly incorrect:

Flat as a pancake; and, note the confirmation that it was on 9/11/01, before 5:21PM, as WTC 7 can be seen standing in the background, right next to the flat expanse.

Your photo is misleading for obvious reasons, jammonius. It is not worthy of the standards applicable to this thread and is a far cry below the level that the other members have adhered to in presenting proof that DEW did not destroy the WTC complex.

 

[Oystein]

In my ongoing quest to teach double-check for accuracy jammonius' physics eptitude, I allowed myself to edit part of the following quote by formatting the subscripts as subscripts.

...
I'd like to double check for accuracy here. Are you attributing the above to Dr. Wood; if so, from where?

So far as I can determine, Dr. Wood has stated on her webpage as follows:

If momentum is conserved it can be used to calculate unknown velocities following a collision.

(m₁ * v₁)_i + (m₂ * v₂)i = (m₁ * v₁)_f + (m₂ * v₂)_f

where the subscript _i signifies initial, before the collision, and _f signifies final, after the collision.

If (m₁)_i = 0, and (v₂)_i = 0, then (v₂)_f must =0.

That last condition "If (m₁)_i = 0, and (v₂)_i = 0", as applied to the above equation, gives us:

(0 * v₁)_i + (m₂ * 0)i = (0 * v₁)_f + (m₂ * v₂)_f

and that describes a body of zero mass colliding with a body with zero veolcity. This cannot rightly be called a "collision". Material bodies with zero mass do not exist and cannot be said to move.

The equation, after multiplying with all zeros, collapses to:

0 + 0 = 0 + (m₂ * v₂)_f
or
(m₂ * v₂)_f = 0
For any m₂ <> 0, this means that v_2f = 0

In other words: When a body that is at rest collides with a body that has no mass, the previously resting body will stay at rest.

Which is as true as it is void of any practical application

So, for conservation of momentum, there cannot be pulverization.
...

How that conclusion follows from the previous triviality, remains a mystery.

 

[twinstead]

I know what I think of these no planers, but I can only imagine what those hundreds, even thousands of people who personally witnessed the second plane hit the WTC on 9-11 think of no planers.

 

[T.A.M.]

Let me get this straight...

A man smart enough to get through law school, sees a picture of "the pile" with large work vehicles next to it, and the pile is 3-4x the height of these vehicles, and he is arguing that the pile was "flat as a pancake".

I think I should take him off ignore for the gits and shiggles.

holy christ jesus.

TAM

 

[carlitos]

That's because it's an overhead photo. Take an overhead of the Himalayas and they will appear flat.

That is false.

Well, they do have a little texture, but it's tough to gauge height.

 

[Oystein]

...
I think I should take him off ignore for the gits and shiggles.

holy christ jesus.
...

I did that yesterday. jammo's performance, always desastrous, has since yesterday developed into a train crash straight out of a Zucker/Abrahams/Zucker movie: It keeps crashing and crashing and piling up more and more hilarious, over-the-top crazy crash features. I imagine a train that speeds into a station, smashes throught the block, over the platform, into the station building, right through the waiting hall, out the other wall, across station plaza, into the gothic church, completely wasting the church, rips throught the town, enters a military compound, destroys tanks, sets the ammo storage a-blasting, is hurled up high in the air, lands on a mountain, avalanches down the slope into a lake, sending a flood wave down the valley, riding the surf, reaching Vancouver, sending hundreds of thousands pedestrians fleeing, screaming, before finaly coming to rest an inch before the Steam Clock in Gastown. A minute passes in tense silence. Then the full hour is reached, the Steam Clock starts whistling the hour, and our train, thus far worn, dented and slightly burned but recognizable, all of a sudden disintegrates completely. Heck - it dustifies! Poof!

 

[Sabretooth]

I did that yesterday. jammo's performance, always desastrous, has since yesterday developed into a train crash straight out of a Zucker/Abrahams/Zucker movie: It keeps crashing and crashing and piling up more and more hilarious, over-the-top crazy crash features. I imagine a train that speeds into a station, smashes throught the block, over the platform, into the station building, right through the waiting hall, out the other wall, across station plaza, into the gothic church, completely wasting the church, rips throught the town, enters a military compound, destroys tanks, sets the ammo storage a-blasting, is hurled up high in the air, lands on a mountain, avalanches down the slope into a lake, sending a flood wave down the valley, riding the surf, reaching Vancouver, sending hundreds of thousands pedestrians fleeing, screaming, before finaly coming to rest an inch before the Steam Clock in Gastown. A minute passes in tense silence. Then the full hour is reached, the Steam Clock starts whistling the hour, and our train, thus far worn, dented and slightly burned but recognizable, all of a sudden disintegrates completely. Heck - it dustifies! Poof!

Please, Gawd, will someone give Oystein some innernetz?!?!

All aboard the LOLtrain!

 

[dtugg]

Is it true that Judy Wood spent six years in a coma?

 

[twinstead]

Is it true that Judy Wood spent six years in a coma?

Actually we're waiting for her to come out of it.

 

[Bell]

I know what I think of these no planers, but I can only imagine what those hundreds, even thousands of people who personally witnessed the second plane hit the WTC on 9-11 think of no planers.

Ask Thunder and Dtugg

 

[Bell]

I did that yesterday. jammo's performance, always desastrous, has since yesterday developed into a train crash straight out of a Zucker/Abrahams/Zucker movie: It keeps crashing and crashing and piling up more and more hilarious, over-the-top crazy crash features. I imagine a train that speeds into a station, smashes throught the block, over the platform, into the station building, right through the waiting hall, out the other wall, across station plaza, into the gothic church, completely wasting the church, rips throught the town, enters a military compound, destroys tanks, sets the ammo storage a-blasting, is hurled up high in the air, lands on a mountain, avalanches down the slope into a lake, sending a flood wave down the valley, riding the surf, reaching Vancouver, sending hundreds of thousands pedestrians fleeing, screaming, before finaly coming to rest an inch before the Steam Clock in Gastown. A minute passes in tense silence. Then the full hour is reached, the Steam Clock starts whistling the hour, and our train, thus far worn, dented and slightly burned but recognizable, all of a sudden disintegrates completely. Heck - it dustifies! Poof!

Nominated