Yes, since it was, and is.
The hilited word is of vast importance.
Now, what does this say? Do you understand the concept? Do you understand written word?
Really? It says
Propaganda? Do you even know the definition of that word?
Triforcharity,
Permit me to make a suggestion concerning your posting: In order to have a basis for assessing the actual content you are posting concerning the issue of steel collection, could you please incorporate that substance so that it is carried over into the responsive post?
As can be seen from the above, nothing of substance is contained in that part of your post that is captured when quoting it.
As things stand, we haven't got the foggiest clue what you are actually saying about the cleanup firm you are referencing, do we?
What exactly are you trying to say about them?
While everyone acknowledges that the FEMA 403 Report is by no means determinative as to what happened on 9/11, that report does, nonetheless, relaibly list for us who participated in what little effort there was to engage in forensic assessment of remnant steel, together with some attempt to measure how much was collected by weight and so on.
In identifying who participated in the forensic part of the work, the firm you are relying on -- Phillips and Jordan (P&J) -- does not appear to be listed, unless I missed it:
http://www.civil.columbia.edu/ce4210/FEMA_403CD/html/pdfs/403_apg.pdf
A listing of the firms and the individuals involved in the assessment of remnant steel is set out at pgs 4 and 5 of the above linked FEMA appendix. Once again, neither Phillips nor Jordan nor P&J is anywhere to be found in that listing.
Please note, too, that FEMA points out that much of the expertise that can be said to have participated in the forensic evaluation of steel was done on a
volunatary basis. This confirms, I here assert, that the effort was haphazard, incomplete and dishonest in so far as valid forensic investigation is concerned.
Is there anywhere in the FEMA report where the firm you are relying on for proof of the claim steel was collected is referenced at all, if so where, pray tell?
I will also continue to look, because, as you know, I do not play '20 question' games by which is meant I do not participate in or initiate such games. I also do not go off on posters' requests for wild goose chases and I do not initiate such requests either. All I'm here suggesting is that if you want to stake out a validly supported claim about steel at the WTC, it would behoove you to consider the FEMA report.
In fact, the best official source for an overall, 127 page survey of the site, and second only in quality to the work done by Dr. Judy Wood, is this from FEMA:
http://www.fema.gov/library/file;js...f&fileid=974abdd0-af95-11df-b5f3-001cc4568fb6
While the file is said to be a large one, it is actually about 10megs and is not too hard to download. That 127pg presentation goes a long way towards laying out the visual evidence of DEW, including straight up confirmation that GZ was flat.
I am merely here staking out a claim as to why I say your reliance on the Phillips firm is propaganda. Neither they nor their 4 page propaganda piece are a source for what was or was not done with or to WTC steel.
