• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NASA Engineer (ret.) is a Twoofie?

Yeah, but a couple of people said different, and it was on a video with creepy music, so...conspiracy!
 
16.5 said:
It is CITGO, big guy.

Anyway, they arranged a whole FAKE South path, but had the REAL plane BANK North of Citgo. GENIUS!!! Freaking genius!

Wow, they are very clever in their intricacies, huh?
Click to expand...

Am I following this right? That there was a N to S (or S to N) flight path?

Wasn't the Pentagon hit on the West side?

Correct me if I'm wrong...I'm just working from memory...
 
uk_dave said:
Oh well, the great expose of the evil 9/11 conspiracy will just have to wait for another day.
Click to expand...
Rats. I hate when that happens. It's been the... how much is 9*365.25+13? (grabs calc)... 3300th time in a row. Maybe tomorrow...
 
RedIbis said:
FTR, and not that I'd have any say in this, but if a debate between Deets and Mackey were to go down, I'd like to see it focused on WTC 7 and not the Pentagon or its related flight. This is where NIST has at least proposed a hypothesis and where the greater amount of documentation exists. IMO, the Pentagon is a non-starter.
Click to expand...

It's embarrassing for you to have to defend no planers right?

I understand why you feel the need to want to change the subject.
 
Miragememories said:
An honest seeker of the truth cannot dismiss the logical conclusion that a north of Citco flightpath means the fallen lightpoles had to have been planted evidence.

MM
Click to expand...

Possibly the most idiotic thing you have posted and that is really saying something.
 
R.Mackey said:
Amazing... :boggled:

Day 2, no answer to my question. Which is for Mr. Deets to back up a claim he made on his own initiative, and one that has to deal with aeronautics.

Anyone willing to bet I'll ever get an answer? Anyone??
Click to expand...
I believe he's waiting for you to reply to his question about speed conversion. If my flight school 101 is correct his question is BS due to the fact the speed was ground speed and not air speed to begin with. So yes he's ignoring you.


:o
 
DGM said:
I believe he's waiting for you to reply to his question about speed conversion. If my flight school 101 is correct his question is BS due to the fact the speed was ground speed and not air speed to begin with. So yes he's ignoring you.
Click to expand...

If he is, it's complete BS. He can use any units he wants. MPH, KCAS, KPH, furlongs per fortnight, I don't care. I invited him to clarify his claim in my original question.

Maybe Truthers are stupid enough to live with this excuse, but I'm not.
 
R.Mackey said:
If he is, it's complete BS. He can use any units he wants. MPH, KCAS, KPH, furlongs per fortnight, I don't care. I invited him to clarify his claim in my original question.

Maybe Truthers are stupid enough to live with this excuse, but I'm not.
Click to expand...
And if you look at opinion and interest polls for the last couple of years it seem the rest of the world is not interested either. I had high hopes for engineer Derek too. Just once I'd like to see a "truther" back his/her claim with some chops (engineering wise).
 
Last edited:
BigAl said:
How do you explain the fact that the bodies of everyone that boarded Flight 77 were identified in the debris of essentially the entire airplane buried inside the Pentagon. All of this was witnessed by hundred of people, we have the statements of about 250. The black boxes were recovered. The audio box records Arabic language and a hijacking. The data box shows a flight path that agrees with the FAA radar track and the cellphone/airphone data and shows that the plane was being flown on manual control by the hijackers control right to the end.
Click to expand...
Gee Al.

Anyone can make a list.

If you have been following the point of our exchange, its basic theme
deals with "planted evidence".

Miragememories said:
"Until you can discredit the north of Citgo, on-the-record eyewitness testimony, the fallen lightpoles remain as 'smoking gun' evidence that the Pentagon attack was a masquerade."
Click to expand...

MM
 
Miragememories said:
Gee Al.

Anyone can make a list.

If you have been following the point of our exchange, its basic theme
deals with "planted evidence".

MM
Click to expand...

Hey, MM, I know your are "kind of a big deal" over the at the Tree Fort. Why don't you tell Shakey and the Buffet Slayer to release their "on the record" raw video tapes like they promised a couple of years ago. Torrent is PERFECT for that. I mean, it is all super nice to have Craig and mute Aldo sitting on the Tree Fort sofa, talking over the tapes, but man, those tapes are "evidence." EVIDENCE that must be preserved at all costs, champ.

Thanks, big guy, and good luck with the whole crazy No Planer stuff. You guys are a freaking credit to the debunking community.
 
Miragememories said:
"An honest seeker of the truth cannot dismiss the logical conclusion that a north of Citgo flightpath means the fallen lightpoles had to have been planted evidence."
Click to expand...
funk de fino said:
"Possibly the most idiotic thing you have posted and that is really saying something."
Click to expand...
Ya my bad for misspelling Citgo.

Maybe you would like to explain how it is idiotic to believe Flight 77 could not be in two places at once?

MM
 
Miragememories said:
Does that include the faked south of Citco flightpath?

Because that faked south of Citco flightpath was created to end inside the Pentagon.

Where the north of Citco flighpath ends, has yet to be determined.

MM
Click to expand...

You mean the plane is still flying?
 
I'll just make this point once in this thread that pentagon no-plane theories are the same as WTC no-plane theories. The same reason the WTC no plane theories are mocked are the same reasons why the ridiculous CIT flyovers are mocked.
 
Miragememories said:
Ya my bad for misspelling Citgo.

Maybe you would like to explain how it is idiotic to believe Flight 77 could not be in two places at once?

MM
Click to expand...

The planted lightpoles is the most idiotic thing. It is up there with Judy Wood flying microwave machines.

Unlike you I have the experience and training to know what I am talking about here. You don't. Even if I did explain it you would handwave it due to ignorance and blind faith.
 
Grizzly Bear said:
I'll just make this point once in this thread that pentagon no-plane theories are the same as WTC no-plane theories. The same reason the WTC no plane theories are mocked are the same reasons why the ridiculous CIT flyovers are mocked.
Click to expand...

you know, it is probably the Pentagon No Planers who are sillier. They get OUTRAGED that someone dares lump them in with the other No Planers, and they say things like:

"We are not saying there was No Plane, we are saying No Plane hit the Pentagon."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom