NASA Engineer (ret.) is a Twoofie?

[BigAl]

The question to be asked is; what happened inside the Pentagon?

What is the truth behind the fallen lightpoles?

An honest seeker of the truth cannot dismiss the logical conclusion that a north of Citco flightpath means the fallen lightpoles had to have been planted evidence.




Until you can discredit the north of Citco, on-the-record eyewitness testimony, the fallen lightpoles remain as 'smoking gun' evidence that the Pentagon attack was a masquerade.

The fallen lightpoles are more pieces of the 9/11 Was An Inside Job puzzle.

MM

I have seen the interviews.

I found the northern flightpath witness testimony to be most compelling.

Did the flightpath end inside the Pentagon?

YES/NO

 

[tsig]

Hear, Hear! As you can see, it's almost as if posters such as 16.5 or Beachnut are intentionally making this a hostile environment so as to prevent any civil discourse whatsoever. I can't imagine what they're afraid of.

When someone comes here for a civil discourse that's what they get.

When they kick in the doors and proclaim they're the fastest gun in the west then they should expect a gunfight.

 

[TexasJack]

FTR, and not that I'd have any say in this, but if a debate between Deets and Mackey were to go down, I'd like to see it focused on WTC 7 and not the Pentagon or its related flight. This is where NIST has at least proposed a hypothesis and where the greater amount of documentation exists. IMO, the Pentagon is a non-starter.

You want an aeronautical engineer for 37 years to discuss a topic where both parties agree that an aircraft wasn't directly involved?

 

[The Big Dog]

You want an aeronautical engineer for 37 years to discuss a topic where both parties agree that an aircraft wasn't directly involved?

Particularly when the aeronautical engineer of 37 years wants to talk about the CIT boys.

hey Mr. Deets, do you agree with Aldo's assessment that Lloyde England "was caught and is guilty?

In some sense, I have even felt sorry for Lloyd because it is clear to him and anyone watching, that he knows he is caught and is guilty. I am still in shock over what I watched and heard in these interviews.

I am looking for constructive discussion/feedback on how you feel about Lloyd and what type of light you think he should be portrayed in. I am also looking for solutions/suggestions on how we can get this man or his interviews and our evidence in front of gov't investigators. To be honest, at this point you would have all you need to march into your local representative's office and demand action.

 

[beachnut]

FTR, and not that I'd have any say in this, but if a debate between Deets and Mackey were to go down, I'd like to see it focused on WTC 7 and not the Pentagon or its related flight. This is where NIST has at least proposed a hypothesis and where the greater amount of documentation exists. IMO, the Pentagon is a non-starter.

You want WTC7 because you don't understand engineering, or what? The CIT equals in engineering are;l Major Tom, femr2, Tony, Derek, and now Deets who make up false ideas about 911.

NIST?, who needs NIST? Deets thinks Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon, but you don't, so you want that same expert on flight 77 and Flight 175, to talk about WTC7. You want a failure on the Pentagon, and Flight 175 to discuss his failed ideas on WTC7. Make sense in a 911 truth way.

WTC7, not even a target on 911. This is funny.

 

[Dog Town]

Cidiots

To be honest, at this point you would have all you need to march into your local representative's office and demand action.

I hope they video this interaction!

 

[Miragememories]

Did the flightpath end inside the Pentagon?

YES/NO

Which flightpath are you referring to?

NORTH/SOUTH?

MM

 

[BigAl]

Which flightpath are you referring to?

NORTH/SOUTH?

MM

Is there more than one Flight 93?

 

[The Big Dog]

Which flightpath are you referring to?

NORTH/SOUTH?

MM

Tappa, tappa, tappa...
Tappa, tappa, tappa.

Looks like old MM went to the Little Debbie School of Dance and Twoof.

Hey, MM, when the CIT boys gonna end "construction" on their failure of a web site? I want to report that I handed a copy of their video to my dog. hee hee!

 

[beachnut]

Which flightpath are you referring to?

NORTH/SOUTH?

MM

The RADAR and FDR have it; you have lies, and idiotic delusions from CIT. You think for yourself individualists are going to break this story in minutes hours days years 9 years never.

Deets knows the FDR is real, and he knows the RADAR data is real. If he does not know this, he was not very good at his NASA job.

Too bad you don't understand the FDR, and RADAR data. You are stuck with repeating the lies spoon-fed to you by CIT. You are impressive, 9 years of failure and you keep spewing nonsense; that is dogged determination. Are the open-minded guru?

 

[Miragememories]

"I found the northern flightpath witness testimony to be most compelling."

"Did the flightpath end inside the Pentagon?

YES/NO"

"Which flightpath are you referring to?

NORTH/SOUTH?"

Is there more than one Flight 93?

I am sorry. The answer you have provided does not address the question.

Please try again.

MM

 

[BigAl]

I am sorry. The answer you have provided does not address the question.

Please try again.

MM

Did any flightpath end at the Pentagon, YES/NO?

I have seen the interviews.

I found the northern flightpath witness testimony to be most compelling.

 

[R.Mackey]

You want an aeronautical engineer for 37 years to discuss a topic where both parties agree that an aircraft wasn't directly involved?

Amazing...

Day 2, no answer to my question. Which is for Mr. Deets to back up a claim he made on his own initiative, and one that has to deal with aeronautics.

Anyone willing to bet I'll ever get an answer? Anyone??

 

[The Big Dog]

Well, Mr. Deets, I know we’ve given a lot to think over, but one final question.

Before you staked your name and professional reputation on the CIT’s video skills, you certainly must have investigated their backgrounds, read their web site, that sort of thing. And before you staked your name and professional reputation on CIT’s video skills, you certainly must have seen their sometimes virulent attacks on their detractors (“face to the name”), and their attacks on witnesses that don’t agree with the CIT Flyover theory.

So I gotta ask, are you more of an Aldo “Up against the wall” fan, or a more cerebral Craig style “30 years hard labor” type of guy?

 

[T.A.M.]

Amazing...

Day 2, no answer to my question. Which is for Mr. Deets to back up a claim he made on his own initiative, and one that has to deal with aeronautics.

Anyone willing to bet I'll ever get an answer? Anyone??

Given he found the discourse in this thread to be intimidating, and this thread is very tame compared to some, I doubt he ever will...but who knows.

TAM

 

[uk_dave]

FTR, and not that I'd have any say in this, but if a debate between Deets and Mackey were to go down, I'd like to see it focused on WTC 7 and not the Pentagon or its related flight. This is where NIST has at least proposed a hypothesis and where the greater amount of documentation exists. IMO, the Pentagon is a non-starter.

FTR I would like to see it confined to the buildings where people were actually killed and which were the actual targets of the attacks. You know, the actual crime scenes.

 

[Miragememories]

"I found the northern flightpath witness testimony to be most compelling."

"Did the flightpath end inside the Pentagon?

YES/NO"

"Which flightpath are you referring to?

NORTH/SOUTH?"

"Did any flightpath end at the Pentagon, YES/NO?"

Does that include the faked south of Citco flightpath?

Because that faked south of Citco flightpath was created to end inside the Pentagon.

Where the north of Citco flighpath ends, has yet to be determined.

MM

 

[The Big Dog]

Does that include the faked south of Citco flightpath?

Because that faked south of Citco flightpath was created to end inside the Pentagon.

Where the north of Citco flighpath ends, has yet to be determined.

MM

It is CITGO, big guy.

Anyway, they arranged a whole FAKE South path, but had the REAL plane BANK North of Citgo. GENIUS!!! Freaking genius!

Wow, they are very clever in their intricacies, huh?

 

[beachnut]

Amazing...

Day 2, no answer to my question. Which is for Mr. Deets to back up a claim he made on his own initiative, and one that has to deal with aeronautics.

Anyone willing to bet I'll ever get an answer? Anyone??

He did a CIT fly-over maneuver, took his 11.2G Balsamo math, adopted thermite, found iron rich spheres, and fell faster than free fall into the pit of ignorance.

It is amazing, he endorsed CIT, joined Gage, joined Balsamo, and now is going to post as soon as he finds that massive ample evidence to support his mega-super-nano-delusions on 911.

He joined Balsamo's failed pilots, who sell lies on DVD (like cat on a stick, but not as tasty)
He joined Gage's personal donate to my travel club and support me scam club for the gullible.
And he endorsed CIT, and the Fly-Over.

What else can Deets mess up about 911? Gage must be cringing, his scam of living off donated money might get critical attention with Deets blindly adopting idiotic lies.

Has Deets contacted the families of Flight 77 victims? Has Deets told them the plane flew over the Pentagon, and that the DNA is not real? Has Deets contacted the FBI? Gage did, and Gage used the FBI brush off as an endorsement of his moronic delusions.

 

[BigAl]

Does that include the faked south of Citco flightpath?

Because that faked south of Citco flightpath was created to end inside the Pentagon.

Where the north of Citco flighpath ends, has yet to be determined.

MM

How do you explain the fact that the bodies of everyone that boarded Flight 77 were identified in the debris of essentially the entire airplane buried inside the Pentagon. All of this was witnessed by hundred of people, we have the statements of about 250. The black boxes were recovered. The audio box records Arabic language and a hijacking. The data box shows a flight path that agrees with the FAA radar track and the cellphone/airphone data and shows that the plane was being flown on manual control by the hijackers control right to the end.