Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess this has been mentioned here before:

Matthew 27.45-53:

"Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour. And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Some of them that stood there, when they heard that, said, This man calleth for Elias. And straightway one of them ran, and took a spunge, and filled it with vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink. The rest said, Let be, let us see whether Elias will come to save him. Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost.

And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many"


Why was that
a) not mentioned in the other testaments (I mean, this is one bl**dy shocking event)

b) why is nothing of the sort mentioned in Roman history? I guess this would be something every frigging legionary, centurion, scribe, rabbi, scholar, visiting Martian and space-time hopping member of the Great Race of Yith would take note of, I presume.
A zombie-plague in Jerusalem!

A straight answer, please.
 
I dunno. Aberhaten is a jerk. He was over at my place last night and all he did was winge about the meal that he insisted I cook for him. What a wanker.
.
To be fair, the veggies were *way* overboiled and had lost most of their texture and taste...
.
 
Yes, I hope yitmas is not holding his/hers breath for a straight answer.
 
All you ever wanted to know about Ramsey but were afraid to ask.

http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/ramsay/ramsay_gasque.pdf
It is a long read but as far as this thread is concerned the key bits are;
The nineteenth-century Ramsay was a very great man; The twentieth-century Ramsay suffered in his scholarly reputation because he allowed himself to be persuaded by Sir William Robertson Nicoll to don the mantle of a popular apologist

The twentieth-century Ramsay tended to be dismissed as unworthy of serious attention by many Neutestamentler who never made themselves acquainted with the solid achievements of the nineteenth-century Ramsay. Ramsay retired in 1911

The book Doc quotes The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament was written in 1915.
 
.
To be fair, the veggies were *way* overboiled and had lost most of their texture and taste...
.
Considering that he demanded that I make him lobster Thermidor, I think I did a damn fine job, overboiled veg or no. Have you ever tried to find fresh lobster in Iowa? It's not easy to do. You have to dig DEEEEEEP to get those bastards to the surface.
 
Fine, I'll parse it. He'll just ignore it like all the others, but I'll do it for the exercise.
You obviously have not read all of this thead because I have pointed out the following which is from Geisler's book (pg. 223) cited in post # 1 of this thread. All of the following facts were derived collectively from "Non-Christian" sources. These sources include such people as Josephus, Tacitus, Celsus etc.

1) Jesus lived during time of Tiberius Caesar.
The time frame in which the Gospel stories are set is indeed during the reign of Tiberius. So what? The time frame of Harry Potter is presumably during the reign of Queen Liz II and Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was set during Nixion's presidency. You point is?

2) He lived a virtuous life.
Hold on a second tiger, just because some character's story is set during the reign of a known ruler, doesn't mean that that character actually exists. Even if we assume that the Big J existed, some of the stories in the propaganda about him isn't favorable.

3) He was a wonder worker.
Well, here you have two tasks. 1) Define "wonder" and 2) Show that they can actually happen.

4) He had a brother {some say cousin} named James.
Ok, I know the difference between a brother and a cousin. Being unclear reduces credibility, not increases.

Even if your sources do agree that he had a male relative, that doesn't mean that either a) existed or b) did the things as described in the NT.

5) He was acclaimed to be the Messiah.
Lot of people were acclaimed to be the Messiah. It was a popular title to claim there for a while. Hell, Wikipedia has an entire list of people who claimed to be the Messiah, and we all know how much you like Wikilists.

6) He was crucified under Pontius Pilate.
Ok, we know that PP lived. We even know that he was Prefect of Jerusalem during the time frame when Jesus was said to do his thang. What we don't know is, if PP actually ever met this Jesus character. There's no extra Biblical contemporary source for that.

7) He was crucified on the eve of the Jewish Passover.
According to the stories yes. There is no extra-Biblical contemporary sources for it though.

8) Darkness and an earthquake occurred when he died.
As someone else pointed out, how the hell did the Romans miss that? Seriously? An earthquake? Goes unrecoreded by everyone but this obscure Jewish sect? Riiiiiiiiight, what's a cubit?

9) His disciples believe he rose from the dead.
WOOHOO!!!! People believe all manner of crazy stuff. There's a lot of folk out there there that believe that they can find water by holding two sticks.

10) His disciples were willing to die for their belief.
Un-huh...and? So, they were stupid is what you're saying?

11) Christianity spread as far as Rome.
ALL THE WAY TO ROME?????!!!!!!!oneleventy!!!!!!! Wow...

ETA: Jerusalem to Rome is about 1400 miles. It's a similar distance from Boston, MA to Omaha, NE.

12) His disciples denied the Roman gods and worshiped Jesus as God.
Uh-huh and the Jews denied the Roman gods and worshiped Gunderscored. The Zoroastrians denied the Roman gods and worshiped Ahura Mazada. The Gauls denied Roman gods and worshiped...um, well, Gallic gods.

Remember these are all facts that can be found in "Non-Christian" independent sources.
No they're not. Granted, there is a little about Christians existing in Josephus (and that's most likely forged), and some others that repeat rumors that they've heard about Christians. There's no contemporary Pliny saying that any of that happened.

Note: Actually I haven't been able to verify #8 yet. Phlegon talked about darkness and there was some talk of an eclipse but Origen disagreed with him that it was a solar eclipse. So fact #8 is a little confusing and the time line of the eclipse is not clear.
So...you once again snipped a list from elsewhere, presented it as, excuse the pun, gospel and didn't bother to verify any of it...good, good. Nice to see your usual standards of excellence are being upheld.
 
Last edited:
There is no such PM.
Oh come on Doc, why would he lie about that when that could be easily verified?
Not to mention he could be sanctioned by the mods here.

No, that doesn't make any sense.
Therefore it's unlikely an invention and must be true.
 
There is no such PM.

Are you suggesting that Twiler, whom Sir William Ramsay has called one of the most honest posters on the JREF forum, is fibbing? You have presented no evidence of this extraordinary claim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom