• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged President Ahmadinejad trips the light fantastic

9/11-investigator said:
No one beats Ahmadinejad. Putin and Ron Paul do not even come close.
...
Click to expand...

You got a point there. His hilarity (hilariosity?) is unrestraint. Paul is restrained by the need to get votes for re-election, and Putin is restrained by the need to at least pretend like he need votes for re-election.
Mahmoud simply sends out his SA.

(Paul and Putin by the way know better than to believe such delusions)
 
Oystein said:
Laugh :D
HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

That dirt dumb piece of **** lie of a so-called paper :D
Click to expand...

'dirt dumb'... I heard that phrase before... you are not accidently posting under the name 'beachnut' as well, are you?

If you print out this document you will see for yourself that it is a paper. Nothing 'so-called' about it.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

What makes you think I am 'desperate'? Posting here usually is a matter of pure joy. And remember Oystein, calling an article a 'bogus piece' is generally not considered as a valid scientific rebuttal of that article.

But what do you know. You probably believe in the H-word as well.
 
Last edited:
Oystein said:
You got a point there. His hilarity (hilariosity?) is unrestraint. Paul is restrained by the need to get votes for re-election, and Putin is restrained by the need to at least pretend like he need votes for re-election.
Mahmoud simply sends out his SA.

(Paul and Putin by the way know better than to believe such delusions)
Click to expand...

deleted.
 
Last edited:
Oystein said:
Laugh :D
HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

That dirt dumb piece of **** lie of a so-called paper :D
I am surprised you'd be so desperate to latch onto that bogus piece.
Click to expand...

So you like it Oystein ? I must post it for you on a regular basis.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/gen.php?file=7TOCPJ.pdf peer-reviewed Thermite paper

It can't be bogus because no American scientific institute has said so. I mean they could easily challenge it in the laboratory but they have not. Therefore it is valid and stands as the definitive study of the WTC dust. The outcome is that nanothermite, a very high-tech incendiary/explosive was found throughout.

PS. It was even on the news..look..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKvGITcmXOc&feature=player_embedded
 
Last edited:
Oystein said:
You got a point there. His hilarity (hilariosity?) is unrestraint. Paul is restrained by the need to get votes for re-election, and Putin is restrained by the need to at least pretend like he need votes for re-election.
Mahmoud simply sends out his SA.

(Paul and Putin by the way know better than to believe such delusions)
Click to expand...

What about the Pope ?


PS.You haven't run off Oystein have you ?
 
Last edited:
9/11-investigator said:
'dirt dumb'... I heard that phrase before... you are not accidently posting under the name 'beachnut' as well, are you?
Click to expand...

I was picking up on an earlier post by you in this thread :)

9/11-investigator said:
If you print out this document you will see for yourself that it is a paper. Nothing 'so-called' about it.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Click to expand...

It isn't worth the ink.
However, I have it on my hard drive, and am intimately familiar with it. And its many flaws and deceptions.

9/11-investigator said:
What makes you think I am 'desperate'? Posting here usually is a matter of pure joy. And remember Oystein, calling an article a 'bogus piece' is generally not considered as a valid scientific rebuttal of that article.
Click to expand...

The valid scientific rebuttal of that article came ETA: poured out abundantly about a week after it was available.
Summary: Bogus from abstract to conclusion. Some of the references are good though. They prove that Harrit, Jones e.al. are liars.
 
Last edited:
MaGZ said:
The walk-out was triggered when he used the phrase "Zionist entity".

It had nothing to do with 9/11.
Click to expand...


Well, it would surprise me if they walked out because of a phrase about a foreign country rather than the direct accusation of orchestrating 9/11. Maybe the whiney guys just were of Jewish descendant?
 
Oystein said:
I was picking up on an earlier post by you in this thread :)



It isn't worth the ink.
However, I have it on my hard drive, and am intimately familiar with it. And its many flaws and deceptions.



The valid scientific rebuttal of that article came ETA: poured out abundantly about a week after it was available.
Summary: Bogus from abstract to conclusion. Some of the references are good though. They prove that Harrit, Jones e.al. are liars.
Click to expand...

How dirt-dumb is that to use your own eloquent language..
 
9/11-investigator said:
'dirt dumb'... I heard that phrase before... you are not accidently posting under the name 'beachnut' as well, are you?

If you print out this document you will see for yourself that it is a paper. Nothing 'so-called' about it.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

What makes you think I am 'desperate'? Posting here usually is a matter of pure joy. And remember Oystein, calling an article a 'bogus piece' is generally not considered as a valid scientific rebuttal of that article.

But what do you know. You probably believe in the H-word as well.
Click to expand...

We know it is a piece of paper with words on it, that Jones and the crew paid to have published, I mean seriously if it was such a bombshell, were are the indictments? Oh, I know Government blah, blah, blah. Or could it be the simple fact that no one outside of the truther community gives that paper a single iota of creedance? As Oystein pointed out there are so many flaws and false conclusions, that "paper" could only be classified as one thing, and that would be toilet paper.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Ahmadinejad?
(I always pretend to be interested in the opinions of pretty ladies like twinstead, even if they smoke)
Click to expand...

Why bold the word opinions? How could my statement NOT be an opinion?

I just find it odd Ahmadinejad is spewing his delightful rhetoric at the UN. Nothing constructive can come from it. I guess he's not a fan of taking the high road; it appears Soviet-style "we will bury you" coupled with conspiracy theories is much more exciting.
 
What a delightful speech. I did note that he failed to mention the actions of the various versions of the Persian Empire that have conquered and occupied people for over 2,300 years. I guess if the west does it its bad but if monotheistic Iran did it (and still does) its okay......
 
Hans said:
I guess if the west does it its bad but if monotheistic Iran did it (and still does) its okay......
Click to expand...

The funny thing is many of the ideologue/truthers on this forum would indeed firmly believe that it is only the west, and specifically the US, that uses propaganda, fear mongering, and mindless political rhetoric to further an agenda.

Ahmadinejad is just misunderstood.
 
Hans said:
What a delightful speech. I did note that he failed to mention the actions of the various versions of the Persian Empire that have conquered and occupied people for over 2,300 years. I guess if the west does it its bad but if monotheistic Iran did it (and still does) its okay......
Click to expand...

Anything in the last two hundred years ?

And America ? lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom