Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

jammonius said:
I do hope Aaron Hatch will post up here at some point and that the OP poster will also return. I'm goin' fishin for the weekend, so I won't be able to respond til Monday.

all the best :cool:
Click to expand...

If you'd actually read the things you post, you'd see that Aaron doesn't care what Judy has to say.
 
jammonius said:
I do hope Aaron Hatch will post up here at some point and that the OP poster will also return. I'm goin' fishin for the weekend, so I won't be able to respond til Monday.

all the best :cool:
Click to expand...
Your support of Judy is consistent with your delusion of jet engine parts being Plymouth wheel-covers.

Secret NSA shots of Jerry fishing...
1fishing.jpg

The fishing sign, no fishing, was beam weapon burned. Or was it soldering ironed in? A task a beam weapon could do.
 
jammonius said:
http://www.aaronmhatch.com/projects/abe/abe.html

The attempt at rebuttal contained in that weblink is at least worthy of the name "attempted rebuttal." On the other hand, yours is not.

Is there anything in the Aaron Hatch piece that you agree with?
Click to expand...

That is really one of the better analyses of Pookzta's work on the web.

Abe's videos on YT were obviously pilfered off the Trazy Train and the Fail Boat and offered for sale through middlemen on the short yellow bus.

He actually thinks pigeons look like an aircraft with fixed wings.

:dl:
 
X said:
Warning: He's not kidding. That picture is HUGE!

It actually froze my computer, and I had to do a hard reboot.


Oh, and I make a million-dollar-challenge prediction that Jammonius will bring up his belief that Ground Zero was flat.
Click to expand...

He more than likely will, and also mention that the towers fell in their own footprint.:)
 
fess said:
He more than likely will, and also mention that the towers fell in their own footprint.:)
Click to expand...

No. He will one day explain that much of the towers was sucked up to the upper atmosphere (no kidding!) :eye-poppi
 
catsmate1 said:
Does Jammy actually believe in the DEW nonsense? The one truther 'idea' that's actually more stupid than the mini-nukes garbage.....
Click to expand...
Of course! Jammonius is also a no-planer, as in no planes hit the WTC.
 
fess said:
He more than likely will, and also mention that the towers fell in their own footprint.:)
Click to expand...

That would be the footprint that is exactly the same size as the debris field.
 
Jammonius: You should know that I accord you absolutely zero credibility. Your lies, delusions, ignorance, inability to learn and utter refusal to support a single one of the many claims you make have made you not worth talking to.

I may occasionally talk about you. Likely this will not be in flattering terms, as you have earned only disrespect and scorn. But I have no inclination to talk to you. There's no point. You are not well. You need help, from someone trained and educated to provide it.

I wouldn't even know you had addressed a post to me, had 9/11 Chewie Defense quoted you. You see, I put you on ignore quite some time ago. And I have my ignore list set to hide posts from those on it completely. The only indication I have that someone on the list posted is a discontinuity in post numbers. I'm not even sure I should be writing this. But apparently, I'm suckered in easily. It won't happen again.

Goodbye. Seek help. Please. For your own good.


And can someone please send me my million dollars?
 
Wait, so an orbital laser dustified the entire tower? So it needed a beam at least as wide as the tower, correct?
 
Discussion about Ground Zero being "flat" has been moved to the pre-existing thread on that subject. Please stick to the topic.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Just read Aaron's article. Nice effort at explaining the defective thought processes!

'He already knows that nothing is 100% certain. Therefore, it is logically possible that he's come to the wrong conclusions. Once he realizes this...'

Well said. I think the difference between we skeptics and 9/11 Truth believers is that, confronted with good quality evidence that our conclusions were wrong, we would modify our conclusions - even if it meant that 9/11 was a government plot, for example.
But truthers are exceptionally resistant to this modification process - one of my favorite examples is with regard to the Barry Jennings story: a lot of truthers just refuse to let go of that one, regardless how illogical it forces them to be.
On an organizational level, the whole AE911Truth group is fixated on the idea of 'freefall' in WTC 7 as some kind of 'proof' of controlled demolition. Their approach is now highly illogical as they can neither:

1) Show by way of precedent where else this has happened in this manner
2) Reconcile the absence of 'freefall' in the WTC towers with their apparent doctrinal position.

A more logical approach would simply be to accept that 'freefall' is not a meaningful indicator of controlled demolition; it can neither prove or disprove whether the WTC collapses were demolitions.

But now they are utterly committed to this idea, they cannot back down. So the logical error persists.
 
Thanks, alienentity. The image depicting the processes is obviously of poor Paint quality, but I figured I'd match Abe's amount of effort in this whole 911 business.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom