PROOF OF DEW put forward by DR. JUDY WOOD required "PRE-DEBUNKING
Greetings among posters, debunkers, lurkers, 9/11 victims families and rational people of all ages:
I have seen many, many self-congratulatory claims of "debunking" of one aspect or another of the questioning of the common storyline of 9/11, however I do not recall seeing one making a claim that an aspect of 9/11 truth has been PRE DEBUNKED as is asserted above by AWSmith.
That caught my interest.
In looking over this thread and in wading through the omnipresent put down posts, it would appear that the proof put forward by Dr. Judy Wood confirming that directed energy weaponry (DEW) were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center complex (WTC) on 9/11/01 stands as the only comprehensively proven explanation of what took place that day that has been placed in the record of a competent governmental authority.
Dr. Wood's comprehensive proof of claim that DEW caused the destruction of the WTC complex on 9/11 was placed in the public, governmental record starting in March, 2007 and can be found at:
http://ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_002619
Request for Correction from Dr. Judy Wood dated March 16, 2007
- Supplement #1 (March 29, 2007) to Request for Correction
- Supplement #2 (April 20, 2007) to Request for Correction
- Extension (June 29, 2007) of NIST review
- Response (July 27, 2007) to Dr. Judy Wood Request for Correction
- Appeal by Dr. Wood of NIST Initial Denial dated August 22, 2007
- NIST Extension to Wood Amendment to Appeal
- Amendment to Appeal dated August 23, 2007
- Response (Jan. 10, 2008) to Wood Amendment to Appeal
The foregoing is the only comprehensivley proven explanation of what destroyed the WTC complex that has ever been published in a public, governmental forum.
Certainly, no one seriously asserts that either the 9/11 Commission Report or the FEMA report or the NIST Report (NCSTAR1) provide a comprehensive explanation of what destroyed the WTC complex. For that matter, those reports all contain disclaimers and/or disavowals sufficient to confirm, on their face, right out in the open, that they are not comprehensive, not accurate and make no pretense of being accurate.
That said, those three reports -- 9/11 Commission, FEMA, NIST -- do provide an emotional fig-leaf of sorts to those who need to believe the common storyline of 9/11. They can claim that those reports confirm the essence of the destruction of the Twin Towers and that, in any event, they saw it all happen on teevee and that is all they need.
OK, we who support the scientific determination made by Dr. Wood grasp the following:
1--There is a strong emotional need to believe what was seen and heard on teevee.
2--What was seen and what was said on teevee created shock & awe and was immediately confirmed via a clear, direct and overt appeal to the xenophobic element of American society. Muslims in countries the USA wanted to bomb, control and/or undermine in some way were the culprits and therefore needed to be bombed some more, invaded, occupied even if it meant bankrupting the USA (as has happened).
You do not need to remind us of items 1 and 2 in the discussion that might unfold here. We know where you are coming from and what motivates you and why you feel and why you believe so strongly the way you feel and the essence of what you believe.
Seeing on teevee is believing for you; and, hearing that Muslims did it is convincing for you.
On with the Crusade.
One further issue needs to put in proper perspective here; namely, the alternative theories including, by way of example, thermite, mini nukes, controlled demolition.
Those three, among others, are theories. They have been asserted and some of them vigorously so. That is fine. Speaking for me, I have no quarrel or truck with those theories.
However, not one of them has been put forward in a comprehensive way and filed with a governmental authority as has Dr. Wood's proof of DEW.
It is fair to say that of the three alternative theories (as distinct from the proof of DEW, making it more than a theory), the thermite claim has been the most widely promulgated. However, despite filing a Request For Correction with NIST, which is how Dr. Wood perfected her proof of DEW, those who support the thermite theory filed their RFC without claiming thermite was the cause of destruction.
That is telling, revealing and of interest for another thread. However, for our purposes here, it should be understood that the only comprehensive proof of what destroyed the WTC complex on 9/11 found in the public record is that of Dr. Judy Wood.
DEW destroyed the WTC complex.
No other explanation comes close to having been proven.
Greetings among posters, debunkers, lurkers, 9/11 victims families and rational people of all ages:
I have seen many, many self-congratulatory claims of "debunking" of one aspect or another of the questioning of the common storyline of 9/11, however I do not recall seeing one making a claim that an aspect of 9/11 truth has been PRE DEBUNKED as is asserted above by AWSmith.
That caught my interest.
In looking over this thread and in wading through the omnipresent put down posts, it would appear that the proof put forward by Dr. Judy Wood confirming that directed energy weaponry (DEW) were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center complex (WTC) on 9/11/01 stands as the only comprehensively proven explanation of what took place that day that has been placed in the record of a competent governmental authority.
Dr. Wood's comprehensive proof of claim that DEW caused the destruction of the WTC complex on 9/11 was placed in the public, governmental record starting in March, 2007 and can be found at:
http://ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_002619
Request for Correction from Dr. Judy Wood dated March 16, 2007
- Supplement #1 (March 29, 2007) to Request for Correction
- Supplement #2 (April 20, 2007) to Request for Correction
- Extension (June 29, 2007) of NIST review
- Response (July 27, 2007) to Dr. Judy Wood Request for Correction
- Appeal by Dr. Wood of NIST Initial Denial dated August 22, 2007
- NIST Extension to Wood Amendment to Appeal
- Amendment to Appeal dated August 23, 2007
- Response (Jan. 10, 2008) to Wood Amendment to Appeal
The foregoing is the only comprehensivley proven explanation of what destroyed the WTC complex that has ever been published in a public, governmental forum.
Certainly, no one seriously asserts that either the 9/11 Commission Report or the FEMA report or the NIST Report (NCSTAR1) provide a comprehensive explanation of what destroyed the WTC complex. For that matter, those reports all contain disclaimers and/or disavowals sufficient to confirm, on their face, right out in the open, that they are not comprehensive, not accurate and make no pretense of being accurate.
That said, those three reports -- 9/11 Commission, FEMA, NIST -- do provide an emotional fig-leaf of sorts to those who need to believe the common storyline of 9/11. They can claim that those reports confirm the essence of the destruction of the Twin Towers and that, in any event, they saw it all happen on teevee and that is all they need.
OK, we who support the scientific determination made by Dr. Wood grasp the following:
1--There is a strong emotional need to believe what was seen and heard on teevee.
2--What was seen and what was said on teevee created shock & awe and was immediately confirmed via a clear, direct and overt appeal to the xenophobic element of American society. Muslims in countries the USA wanted to bomb, control and/or undermine in some way were the culprits and therefore needed to be bombed some more, invaded, occupied even if it meant bankrupting the USA (as has happened).
You do not need to remind us of items 1 and 2 in the discussion that might unfold here. We know where you are coming from and what motivates you and why you feel and why you believe so strongly the way you feel and the essence of what you believe.
Seeing on teevee is believing for you; and, hearing that Muslims did it is convincing for you.
On with the Crusade.
One further issue needs to put in proper perspective here; namely, the alternative theories including, by way of example, thermite, mini nukes, controlled demolition.
Those three, among others, are theories. They have been asserted and some of them vigorously so. That is fine. Speaking for me, I have no quarrel or truck with those theories.
However, not one of them has been put forward in a comprehensive way and filed with a governmental authority as has Dr. Wood's proof of DEW.
It is fair to say that of the three alternative theories (as distinct from the proof of DEW, making it more than a theory), the thermite claim has been the most widely promulgated. However, despite filing a Request For Correction with NIST, which is how Dr. Wood perfected her proof of DEW, those who support the thermite theory filed their RFC without claiming thermite was the cause of destruction.
That is telling, revealing and of interest for another thread. However, for our purposes here, it should be understood that the only comprehensive proof of what destroyed the WTC complex on 9/11 found in the public record is that of Dr. Judy Wood.
DEW destroyed the WTC complex.
No other explanation comes close to having been proven.
