Invitation to Derek Johnson to discuss his ideas

[AZCat]

His words were "there are plenty of people there more than capable of answering all of your questions."

So he didn't necessarily include himself in that group?

Where are they?

Maybe they just don't find your questions interesting.

 

[Derek Johnson]

And, what is stopping you or your hero? You are on a website accomplishing nothing, yet you do, what exactly?

Complain about not getting the information? Seriously?

Tell you what, I will download and post a complaint seeking judicial review for you and your pal. Will you take ACTION, or as another truther said not so long ago, just sit on the internet conspiraspanking?

I'm here to get answers, how are yours coming along?

 

[The Big Dog]

He misquoted then tried to weasel out. Apologizing would be a more respectable way out. But no, not in 9-11 debunking.

********, he cited you to the very page of the NIST report to which he was referring. Hell, he posted the god damn data graph, I don't recall you addressing that. And you have spent the last five hours dancing away from it, truther.

Hey, how are we doing with you addressing this:

How is the Federal Case coming?

You are here wasting our time, when you could petition a Federal Court for direct relief?

I'll send something to you if you agree to do something with it, truther.

 

[Derek Johnson]

So he didn't necessarily include himself in that group?

[quote[Where are they?

Maybe they just don't find your questions interesting.[/QUOTE]

Maybe.

I would think they would have an inkling about the buckle AND girder pushing thermally expanding beams.

I would also think they would have a clue about the energy dissipated in column buckling and critical load carrying redundancy.

Guess not.

 

[The Big Dog]

I'm here to get answers, how are yours coming along?

Excellently, sport, you came here asking why NIST didn't release the information your hero was looking for, I answered it, and told you how to try to go get it.

And yet here you are.

C'mon, Derek, bring your case to Federal Court, you have everything you need, make a name for yourself, truther.

 

[beachnut]

His words were "there are plenty of people there more than capable of answering all of your questions."

Where are they?

They are not that hard. And they have been multiplied all over this thread.

You don't have questions, you have answers you are withholding to questions so you don't have to answer thermite questions.

You don't have to tell us who you are going to put on trial for murder since you already have the answers.

Who did it? Who will you and Gage put on trial and hang for 911?

Were there 19 terrorists, or are you sure terrorist can't fly?

Post your answers, we all knew you were playing games, acting like a truther. Run up your answers, they will not help your claims of thermite nor find the imaginary people who planted the imaginary thermite.

You said this!

It is my opinion that a more complete and thorough FEA survey than the one I performed will help erode the credibility of the 9-11 report of record, and provide political pressure to bring those responsible for the 9-11 murders to trial.

How much progress have you made? Any trial coming up? Called the FBI yet?

 

[AZCat]

Maybe.

I would think they would have an inkling about the buckle AND girder pushing thermally expanding beams.

They might indeed (if that's the issue of interest).

I would also think they would have a clue about the energy dissipated in column buckling and critical load carrying redundancy.

It's possible.

Guess not.

Really? It would seem you have insufficient information to make such a judgment.

 

[Derek Johnson]

********, he cited you to the very page of the NIST report to which he was referring. Hell, he posted the god damn data graph, I don't recall you addressing that. And you have spent the last five hours dancing away from it, truther.

Hey, how are we doing with you addressing this:

How is the Federal Case coming?

You are here wasting our time, when you could petition a Federal Court for direct relief?

I'll send something to you if you agree to do something with it, truther.

He misquoted, I specifically asked him where on the page, question coward, and he stepped all over himself.

Oops.

Need me to make it more lucid for you?

TFK

""NIST specifically says that the external north wall fell, for approximately 100' at "approximately g"."

Nowhere does it specifically say this in 1-9. TFK was paraphrasing. But then what happened next was pathetic:

"Every one of those bolded words screams one word: "approximation"."

Specific is specific, approximation is approximation. He is welcome to answer my soft pitch questions any time. You are as well. Will you? Will TFK? Will anyone?

 

[Derek Johnson]

It would seem you have insufficient information to make such a judgment.

Maybe, we'll see.

 

[Derek Johnson]

You don't have questions, you have answers you are withholding to questions so you don't have to answer thermite questions.

You don't have to tell us who you are going to put on trial for murder since you already have the answers.

Who did it? Who will you and Gage put on trial and hang for 911?

Were there 19 terrorists, or are you sure terrorist can't fly?

Post your answers, we all knew you were playing games, acting like a truther. Run up your answers, they will not help your claims of thermite nor find the imaginary people who planted the imaginary thermite.

You said this!
How much progress have you made? Any trial coming up? Called the FBI yet?

In 14,000+ JREF postings, I'd expect that you'd be able to answer my easy questions. Will you? Will anyone?

 

[beachnut]

I didn't come here to prove anything. I was asked to come here and was promised answers to my questions.

What's holding you back beachnut?

What is holding you back Derek from explain the thermite conspiracy?

Evidence?

The thread is about you discussing your ideas. Discuss, and drop the cheap truther imitation asking questions, which you have the answer to already. Questions which will not help you figure out 911. And answers you seem reluctant to share; what you lied, you don't have them?

Guys,

This is an invitation to one of the AE911t engineers to come aboard & discuss some of his ideas.

Derek, I hope that you join us. ...

Guys, I've sent Derek a note telling him about this thread. I've asked him to join us. Derek can introduce himself if he does. He's a young engineer, 3 years out of UTA.

Play nice...


Tom

Your ideas, not your questions you already have answers to and are hiding them, holding them like candy teasing your kids. How cute.

Remember this is your statement.

... provide political pressure to bring those responsible for the 9-11 murders to trial.

Who are you major suspects to put on trial? You have evidence right? Any progress?

 

[Derek Johnson]

Excellently, sport, you came here asking why NIST didn't release the information your hero was looking for, I answered it, and told you how to try to go get it.

And yet here you are.

C'mon, Derek, bring your case to Federal Court, you have everything you need, make a name for yourself, truther.

Again, I agree with you on getting NIST to reveal, no argument.

But hey, this is JREF, you should be able to answer my easy questions regarding buckling/pushing beams....and zero energy dissipation column buckling. Will you answer my questions? Will anyone here? Can anyone here do this?

 

[The Big Dog]

He misquoted, I specifically asked him where on the page, question coward, and he stepped all over himself.

Oops.

Need me to make it more lucid for you?

TFK

""NIST specifically says that the external north wall fell, for approximately 100' at "approximately g"."

Nowhere does it specifically say this in 1-9. TFK was paraphrasing. But then what happened next was pathetic:

"Every one of those bolded words screams one word: "approximation"."

Specific is specific, approximation is approximation. He is welcome to answer my soft pitch questions any time. You are as well. Will you? Will TFK? Will anyone?

Seriously sport? WOW! He said that NIST specifically said that THE EXTERNAL NORTH WALL, catch what I just did there truther? Specifically said that the external North wall THE NORTH WALL:

dropped at approximately g

The reference to "specifically" was to the NORTH WALL. The approximately reference was to the acceleration.

Here, let me show you a graph, truther:

Wow. You've wasted how much time on this?

You could have been drafting a petition for judicial review. Tick tock, truther, you don't have all day to do it....

 

[The Big Dog]

Again, I agree with you on getting NIST to reveal, no argument.

But hey, this is JREF, you should be able to answer my easy questions regarding buckling/pushing beams....and zero energy dissipation column buckling. Will you answer my questions? Will anyone here? Can anyone here do this?

I take the questions one at a time, truther. One thing we know, you won't be posting any more references to why NIST didn't release some data. The answer is because the truthers did not seek judicial review.

 

[beachnut]

Invitation to Derek Johnson to discuss his ideas; the op

In 14,000+ JREF postings, I'd expect that you'd be able to answer my easy questions. Will you? Will anyone?

This is easy. Fire cause WTC 7 to collapse; you hiding your answers to your questions is childish nonsense expected from the 911 truth cult members who follow Gage out of ignorance.

You have claims of thermite, your silly questions will not answer my questions.

How much thermite was used to bring down WTC7?
Why was no evidence found?
Why did Jones lie about thermite and make it up as what happen 4 years after 911?
Why did Jones get fired?
How stupid does one have to be to believe Gage when he uses Jones failed thermite scenario and has never quantified the amount, or offered any evidence, he is just asking idiotic questions instead of doing real research?


You have the delusion of CD, why can't you discuss it and try to prove your theory?
You believe thermite did it, why are you so ashamed to try to offer how, how much and who did it?

If you have the answer post them! You can't post the equations related to your questions so I figure you are full of BS. You can't discuss your ideas? Why? Are you on the take with Gage? How much money did you get for talking?

How many people showed up in Atlanta? How much money did first responders get? Or was it a fraud? Are you part of a fraud?

If you are a member of Gage's group, you are a member of Fraud!

 

[The Big Dog]

Not so much, Ron Brookman S.E., is.

How's #1212 coming along 16.5? Use your google button, it might prove helpful.

He is? Specifically?

Has he learned to write better than that abortion he posted on AE911truth? I'd ask you for a link, but who we kidding, right truther?

"Many architects had never seen WTC7 collapse like WTC7 collapsed that day." Signed R. Brookman, seventh grade.

I'm "paraphrasing," truther.

 

[AZCat]

Maybe, we'll see.

Probably not. I doubt your questions will ever be answered to your satisfaction.

That, however, doesn't have significance. Whether or not there are experts at the JREF forums who can answer your questions to your satisfaction cannot be proven false (easily, at least).

 

[The Big Dog]

I'm not the only one wasting time. Say, how are we doing with #1212 there twoofie-crusher?

Hmm?

Hee hee, next time, just say you are trolling sport.

Nice analysis of the data posted 100 posts ago....

Good luck with the Federal Lawsuit, twoof, we are sure you'll knock them dead.

 

[The Big Dog]

Not so much twoofie-crusher. #1212 gets to the fundamentals, neanderthal answers won't cut it with the twoof.

Speaking of, how are we doing with #1212? Hmm?

Speaking of, how are we doing with this:

 

[Derek Johnson]

He is? Specifically?

Has he learned to write better than that abortion he posted on AE911truth? I'd ask you for a link, but who we kidding, right truther?

"Many architects had never seen WTC7 collapse like WTC7 collapsed that day." Signed R. Brookman, seventh grade.

I'm "paraphrasing," truther.

Seventh grade? Proof?

Say, how are we doing on #1152 / #1172 there twoof-smashing JREFer?