Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
T.A.M. said:
Just a reminder, I will be in full 9/11 CT subforum SILENCE as of 12AM tonight/tomorrow AM. Out of respect to those who lost their lives, and those who risked their lives on that day, I hope many of you do the same.

TAM:)
Click to expand...
The T R U T H never sleeps.

MM
 
yah, somehow I expected about as much from your ilk.

Anyway, I watched a new (to me) special on 9/11 yesterday, called "My 9/11". It featured recollections of various persons from that day, told from their perspectives. One interesting part, they gave the stories of a photographer (interviewing him, etc...) and also from the perspective of one of the people he had captured in a photo (a black woman) running from the WTC.

Good show.

TAM:)
 
I have not been looking around the forum, where is the tread about the truther rally in New York?

Did they both show up?
 
Miragememories said:
The T R U T H never sleeps.

MM
Click to expand...

Like when you claimed that the distant northerly still sequence of WTC7 would show a southerly lean if there had been one?

And you turned out to be totally wrong?

That kind of T R U T H?
 
sabretooth47 said:
This trailer is hilarious.

Um...Bill? Did you not notice that everyone in the trailer thinks Stephen Jones is a lunatic?

Growing in stature, you say? LOL.
Click to expand...

Yes but when you start as Shoe scum, there is little other place to gp but up.

TAM:)
 
bill smith said:
Lawrence Wilkerson, former Powell Chief of Staff, says 9/11 Commission Report probably got 60% wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRKFbLJDfl4&feature=player_embedded#!
Click to expand...

Listen again Bill. That's not what he said.
He said that they did not get to 60% of the whole truth.

His whole arguement, had you cared to listen to it, is that there are questions about the "culpability" in the form of "negligence" in the halls of American political and military power.

He also says that no one could have predicted nature of the attacks, the day of the targets, or the targets of Sept 11/01. He says that with the clearness of hindsight we can see connections that could not be seen in foresight.

I have now listened to 1/2 of the interview and have heard NOTHING to bolster the contentions of those who do not accept the common narritive of Sept 11/01.

His entire slant so far is that the politicos, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, were incompetant!
 
Well read "The Commission" and you'll realize there was lots they didn't get to or access to....but nothing that would changethe narrative of who carried out the attacks, and how....merely, from best i can tell, evidence that might reveal more incompetence and ignorance were at play then previously seen or heard of.

TAM:)
 
Redibis is whining again over being called on his attacks on the FDNY in another thread, so here it is again.

RedIbis said:
You said there was no discernible inferno at the WTC7.
Click to expand...
Correct, because there isn't one.
Click to expand...

Redibis, you know full well that this is a direct contradiction of what the firefighters themselves say what they saw. You have seen before on numerous occasions Gravy's firefighter witness page.

You cannot claim there was no major inferno in WTC7 without clearly and implicitly accusing the firefighters of lying.
 
jaydeehess said:
Listen again Bill. That's not what he said.
He said that they did not get to 60% of the whole truth.

His whole arguement, had you cared to listen to it, is that there are questions about the "culpability" in the form of "negligence" in the halls of American political and military power.

He also says that no one could have predicted nature of the attacks, the day of the targets, or the targets of Sept 11/01. He says that with the clearness of hindsight we can see connections that could not be seen in foresight.

I have now listened to 1/2 of the interview and have heard NOTHING to bolster the contentions of those who do not accept the common narritive of Sept 11/01.

His entire slant so far is that the politicos, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, were incompetant!
Click to expand...

He said that theoretically there should be a new 9/11 investigation but that practically it would be pointless because they would essentially just find themselves innocent.

Well there are ways around that and I will happily accept his theoretical position as should we all..
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Redibis is whining again over being called on his attacks on the FDNY in another thread, so here it is again.



Redibis, you know full well that this is a direct contradiction of what the firefighters themselves say what they saw. You have seen before on numerous occasions Gravy's firefighter witness page.

You cannot claim there was no major inferno in WTC7 without clearly and implicitly accusing the firefighters of lying.
Click to expand...

I've explained myself ad nauseum and being the petulant and incivil poster you are, I don't really feel like obliging your tedious, previously answerd questions. But it's really not that hard, so I'll give it one more shot.

Some commanders called WTC 7 fully involved, but after the NIST report, we know that the bldg was only on fire for a limited number of floors. Does this make those commanders liars? I don't think so, but by your reductionist logic, you must think they are liars.
 
RedIbis said:
I've explained myself ad nauseum and being the petulant and incivil poster you are, I don't really feel like obliging your tedious, previously answerd questions. But it's really not that hard, so I'll give it one more shot.

Some commanders called WTC 7 fully involved, but after the NIST report, we know that the bldg was only on fire for a limited number of floors. Does this make those commanders liars? I don't think so, but by your reductionist logic, you must think they are liars.
Click to expand...

Ask a fireman. How do you know that the fires as found by NIST are not properly described as "fully involved" by Joe Fireman?
 
BigAl said:
Ask a fireman. How do you know that the fires as found by NIST are not properly described as "fully involved" by Joe Fireman?
Click to expand...

Lots of firemen described the total fire of WTC7 AL. In fact they all sounded like they attended the same lesson..
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Lots of firemen described the total fire of WTC7 AL. In fact they all sounded like they attended the same lesson..
Click to expand...

Yeah, they all receive the same training bill, correct!! Holy ****, you got something about firefighting right!! That's a first!!

Yes Bill, they all are taught from the same exact textbooks, and have the same knowledge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom