Kevin_Lowe
Unregistered
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2003
- Messages
- 12,221
This 'coerced-internalized' false confession' thing paints Amanda as a pretty weak reed.
No. Young people, the mentally disabled and so on are more likely to fall victim to an internalised false confession, but it doesn't follow from the fact that a person fell victim to an internalised false confession that they are necessarily dumber or weaker than the average.
If she's that ready to go along to get along then why wouldn't she participate in the murder for the same reason.
Internalised false confessions are documented psychological phenomenon. Spontaneous murder-participation is something you just pulled out of thin air.
In any case, you're still sniping at irrelevancies while ignoring the elephant in the room of the time of death. If she wasn't there when Meredith died she didn't participate, no matter what amateur armchair psychology you make up.
Since they were convicted unanimously then maybe your understanding of the nature and the quality of the evidence is faulty.
This mole is already flat. We are examining the court's conclusion, so appealing to the court's conclusion as evidence for its own truth is circular. Stop popping up well-flattened moles and address the elephant in the room.