So you meant to say a part of the collapse took 6.5 seconds not the whole thing.
I meant to say that people who go out of their way to point out that 47 storeys fell in 6.5 seconds are not denying gravity, which is the topic of this thread.
So you meant to say a part of the collapse took 6.5 seconds not the whole thing.
I meant to say that people who go out of their way to point out that 47 storeys fell in 6.5 seconds are not denying gravity, which is the topic of this thread.
Where did the thread's creator go? Did he bite off more than he could chew? Has he been instructed to lie low while damage limitation is implemented?
Does the no-planer/space-beamer think he's scored points somewhere?
Does the no-planer/space-beamer think he's scored points somewhere?
So I ask our resident Truthers: Can a building defy gravity?
All buildings defy gravity, for as long as they remain standing.
It's a silly question - any answer fits.
He does,and that is deliciously funny.
How is this "embarrassed"? All building do in fact defy gravity until they fall down (be it by natural or unnatural causes). The OP (granted) is stupid but, WTF are you talking about?Even two JREFers were embarrassed into telling some truth.
In order for a building to achieve free fall, it must be going 120 mph.
Originally Posted by 9/11 Chewy Defense
In order for a building to achievefree fallterminal velocity, it must be going 120 mph.
So a sky diver that just jumps out the door of a flying airplane is not at that moment in free fall?
So a sky diver that just jumps out the door of a flying airplane is not at that moment in free fall?
Can a building defy gravity?
Truthers: "Yes"
Myriad: "Yes"
911 Chewy Defense: "No"
Anyone else feel like climbing off the fence?
All buildings defy gravity, for as long as they remain standing. But, gravity never stops acting on them. So when something happens to a building that sufficiently compromises its ability to continue to defy gravity, it falls down.
The problem with some Truthers is that the only thing they can imagine that would compromise a building's ability to continue to defy gravity is explosive demolition. This is kind of like claiming that because the normal function of people's legs is to allow them to stand upright against gravity, any time a person falls down it must mean someone has cut their legs off.
Respectfully,
Myriad
Can you direct me to any investigations into building collapses where the investigators conclude that the cause of collapse was gravity?
Where did the thread's creator go? Did he bite off more than he could chew? Has he been instructed to lie low while damage limitation is implemented?
How is this "embarrassed"? All building do in fact defy gravity until they fall down (be it by natural or unnatural causes). The OP (granted) is stupid but, WTF are you talking about?
Newtons Law! Go read something about gravity from Issac Newton.
ftfy, Chewy.
Actually, terminal velocity for an object depends on weight, size and shape.
You probably meant Isaac Newton. Totally different author.