Gravity defying buildings? :D

[Sabretooth]

That's the one! I was close on the "Isaac" name.

I think truthers are basing their understanding of gravity on Isaac Asimov

 

[bardamu]

Re-read Myriad's answer again, which clears things up.

All buildings defy gravity, for as long as they remain standing.

But, gravity never stops acting on them. So when something happens to a building that sufficiently compromises its ability to continue to defy gravity, it falls down.

Truthers agree with debunkers that something compromised WTC 7's ability to defy gravity. The disagreement is over what it was.

I think truthers are basing their understanding of gravity on Isaac Asimov

In what way does a truther's understanding of gravity differ from a debunker's understanding of gravity?

 

[DGM]

The only reason why I made this thread is for dumb Truthers to take the bait, & 1 did.

Why on earth would you want to "bait" them? You need to find yourself a (better) hobby.

 

[Sabretooth]

In what way does a truther's understanding of gravity differ from a debunker's understanding of gravity?

Read any post from Christopher7...

The whole point of the OP, put in simple terms: If you remove the support structure of a building, why is it a surprise that the building falls down?

Some Truthers seem to think that the only way to fell a building is via controlled demolition.

 

[Adolph]

How can gravity be the cause of a building collapse when the same gravity is acting on millions of buildings that don't collapse?

The reason they don't collapse is that each building built over one story has an anti-gravity device that is for that building. It was simple to collapse the WTC, just unplug the anti-gravity machine.

You think buildings have UPSs to power their data centers? That's a scam, it keeps the anti gravity generators running. Now that you know the secret, look out for black helicopters and black Crown Vics with tinted black windows.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Why on earth would you want to "bait" them? You need to find yourself a (better) hobby.

I like this kind of hobby! It's better than building replicas of the WTC's out of cardboard though.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Truthers agree with debunkers that something compromised WTC 7's ability to defy gravity. The disagreement is over what it was.

In what way does a truther's understanding of gravity differ from a debunker's understanding of gravity?

It's not over til I say it's over....................gravity caused WTC7 to collapse. Now it's over!

Truthers think that gravity isn't an issue when a building collapses, when in fact, it's an issue.

 

[bardamu]

The whole point of the OP, put in simple terms: If you remove the support structure of a building, why is it a surprise that the building falls down?

The reason they don't collapse is that each building built over one story has an anti-gravity device that is for that building. It was simple to collapse the WTC, just unplug the anti-gravity machine.

Truthers think that gravity isn't an issue when a building collapses, when in fact, it's an issue.

If fires removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

If a controlled demolition removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

See? No difference between debunker gravity and truther gravity.

Edited by LashL: 

Removed breach and beginning of off-topic derail and bickering here

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

If fires removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

If a controlled demolition removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

See? No difference between debunker gravity and truther gravity.

Edited by LashL: 

Removed quote of moderated content

There is a big difference when you compare the sounds of a CD to that of WTC7's collapse. In a CD you see flashes & hear the explosives, which can be heard 1/2 mile away. WTC7 didn't have either of those & the people in the streets & across the Hudson River didn't hear any explosive sounds.

Edited by LashL: 

Removed response to modded content

 

[bardamu]

There is a big difference when you compare the sounds of a CD to that of WTC7's collapse. In a CD you see flashes & hear the explosives, which can be heard 1/2 mile away. WTC7 didn't have either of those & the people in the streets & across the Hudson River didn't hear any explosive sounds.

What does this have to do with Earth's gravity?

Edited by LashL: 

Removed continuing bickering re modded content

 

[beachnut]

What does this have to do with Earth's gravity?




I might reconsider, depending on your answer to the above question.

After 8 years of failure, what does 911 truth do with their moronic CD delusion? 911 truth fails at hearing, fire science, engineering, rational thinking, logic, physics, and math. 3 days, 9 years of failure. Next year, 10 years.

The 911 truth CD theory is nonsense made up by liars living in a fantasy world. No one can support 911 truth claims.

The point is 911 truth ignores gravity and makes up lies. The point is there is no CD; never was. The point is 911 truth is pointless.

What is your point? Do you have a goal? What is your evidence for your claims? What are your claims? Do you support the failed ideas of 911 truth?

If fires removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

And fires were the only thing in WTC7; means 911 truth idiotic CD theory is a lie. good job debunking 911 truth

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

What does this have to do with Earth's gravity?


I might reconsider, depending on your answer to the above question.

Because you know nothing about Newtons Law!

Edited by LashL: 

Removed continued bickering re modded content

 

[bardamu]

Because you know nothing about Newtons Law!

Flashes and sounds have something to do with gravity because I know nothing about Newton's Law?

Edited by LashL: 

Removed continued bickering re modded content

 

[bardamu]

After 8 years of failure, what does 911 truth do with their moronic CD delusion? 911 truth fails at hearing, fire science, engineering, rational thinking, logic, physics, and math. 3 days, 9 years of failure. Next year, 10 years.

The 911 truth CD theory is nonsense made up by liars living in a fantasy world. No one can support 911 truth claims.

The point is 911 truth ignores gravity and makes up lies. The point is there is no CD; never was. The point is 911 truth is pointless.

What is your point? Do you have a goal? What is your evidence for your claims? What are your claims? Do you support the failed ideas of 911 truth?

And fires were the only thing in WTC7; means 911 truth idiotic CD theory is a lie. good job debunking 911 truth

You failed to answer the question.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Edited by LashL: 

Removed continued bickering re modded content

 

[jaydeehess]

Q. Can buildings defy fire?

A. Yes. The only tall building in history alleged to have completely collapsed primarily due to fire was WTC 7.

A: Yes BUT only if the fire is accompanied by effective fire suppression methods, not accompanied by other mechnical damage. Then of course it is well docuemented that fire has caused major structural damage to many all steel structures in the past including some complete collapses (KaderToy factory for eg.) and many more partial collapses.

 

[jaydeehess]

If fires removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

If a controlled demolition removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

See? No difference between debunker gravity and truther gravity.

.

Except that there is a great deal of evidence of major office fires in WTC 7, even more docuementation of the effects of fire on steel. There is no evidence pf explosive or incidiary use in WTC 7.

What would Occam think?

 

[Lensman]

I think truthers are basing their understanding of gravity on Isaac Asimov

Don't insult The Good Doctor, he knew more about physics than the most highly "educated" troofer.

 

[JackDaniels]

If fires removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

If a controlled demolition removed the support structure of WTC 7, gravity would then bring the building down.

See? No difference between debunker gravity and truther gravity.

And if directed energy beams from an invisible spacecraft removed the support structure of WTC 7, then gravity would bring the building down.

 

[bardamu]

And if directed energy beams from an invisible spacecraft removed the support structure of WTC 7, then gravity would bring the building down.

Exactly. Nice to see I haven't been wasting my time.