Oh my, now Karl, Baron von Reichenbach is cited (for whatever reason) as a serious source for the electric iron sun? Mesmerizing I must say.
von Richenbach is quoted in support of the discovery of the aether, which took place over many years and was the result of the work of many scientists.
Well, then time to repeat my request:
Now, please start describing your "electric sun" model in full detail, which was the main question in that post.
1. How is the sun powered in this electrical model
The spherical iron sun acts like an antenna transforming aether into electricity similar to a photon receiving antenna. when you examine this idea in the context of Aetherometrys conceptualization of the photon, its really photons
"Basic differences between the conventional and aetherometric conceptions of the photon
1. On the nature of photons
1.1. Currently, it is held that solar radiation consists of photons. Implied in this is the notion that photons travel through space, like fibers of light, with analogy to ballistic models for the projection of material particles - as if the photons were hurled across space.
It is the view of aetherometric theory that solar radiation does not consist of photons, but of the massfree electrical charges that compose the scalar electrical field [
http://aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2B.html#abstractAS2-17A]. Moreover, it is also the view of aetherometric theory that photons are 'punctual' and local productions, that they do not travel through space but rather occupy a globular space where they are created and extinguished.
1.2. If photons do not travel through space, what is it that travels through space and is the cause of the transmission of the light stimulus, and ultimately of any local production of photons?
Aetherometry contends that what travels through space and transmits the light impulse is electrical radiation composed of massfree charges and their associated longitudinal waves (the true phase waves), not electromagnetic radiation composed of photons and their transverse waves. The wave transmission of all electromagnetic signals depends on the transmission of nonelectromagnetic energy, specifically the transmission of electric massfree charges (the propagation of Òthe fieldÓ). "
2. How is the current driven that you need to sustain the solar output
How is current driven in a radio receiver? Basically you amplify the existing current that shows up on the antenna. It is a resonance phenomena.
At this level the leakage current is great enough to sustain the glow mode operation of the sun.
3. What is the current loop, i.e. how does it close on itself
As long as the surrounding area is at a lower potential than the sun current will flow out of the sun into space.
Its possible that electrons disintegrate back into aether or that space is expanding requiring more electrons.
4. What is the magnetic field generated by this current driving the sun
High voltage doesnt appear to generate much of a magnetic field where as high current does.
5. Is this magnetic field compatible with the magnetic field measured e.g. near the Earth
6. How come that Ulysses did not measure any such currents while passing over the poles (if you want to use Alfvén's heliospheric current system) (and the same question goes to Mozina)
There is no doubt that there are polar plumes and electron beam that emit x-rays. This means high voltage.
7. How you do mean that your electrons come from the Aether, and what properties does the Aether have
Please come up with an answer to these questions. You may even PM Michael Mozina to help you finish this "intriguing" model.
If you are asking what is the exact physical process that makes electrons out of aether, I dont know exactly. It probably the same problem the Arp and Narlikar were working on. It could be from a pinch process as outlined here
Cosmic ray spectrum above 1015 eV (a new approach)
A.A. Petrukhin
Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow 115409, Russia
Presenter: A.A. Petrukhin (petruhin@nevod.mephi.ru), rus-petrukhin-AA-abs1-og12-oral
A new approach to cosmic ray description based on the model of particle generation and acceleration in plasma pinches and on supposition that a new state of matter appears in cosmic ray interactions above 1015 eV is considered. Consequences for various aspects of cosmic ray physics and some possibilities to check this hypothesis are discussed.
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/962389/files/13137-rus-petrukhin-AA-abs1-og12-oral.pdf
Here Aetherometry says they have detected the process.
"AS2-17C The cosmic background microwave radiation as evidence
for cosmological creation of electrons with minimum kinetic energy
and for a minimum of cosmic ambipolar massfree energy"
Correa PN, Correa AN
Exp Aetherom, Series 2, Vol. 2B, 17C:1-61 (April 2002)
"Lastly, a prediction of radio CBR blackbodies issued from cosmological protons and other hadrons in resonance with the identified spectrum of cosmological ORgone energy is presented, together with a model of how it might account for observed anisotropies of the microwave CBR spectrum. There are thus three distinct cosmological spectra: an ambipolar Cosmic Background Orgone Radiation spectrum, the CBOR, and the derived photon spectra - a lepton-based microwave Cosmic Background Radiation blackbody (mCBR) and a predicted hadron-based radio Cosmic Background Radiation blackbody (rCBR). We claim identification of both the CBOR and the rCBR spectra, as well as of their physics.
The conclusions from this aetherometric investigation can be summarized as follows. The microwave CBR spectrum composed exclusively of LFOT photons constitutes proof of:
1. the cosmological creation of electrons, with attendant gravitons, and having discrete minima of kinetic energy, with a main mode at 4 -2
2. the existence of a minimal spectrum (which we identify) of ambipolar electric radiation throughout the cosmos - confirming Reich's notion that there is a minimum of ORgone energy that permeates the entirety of Space.
3. the existence of a physical process that converts free, nonelectric, nonelectromagnetic, nongravitic, 'latent thermal' or 'antigravitic' massfree energy into ORgone energy, or ambipolar electric radiation and, in the process, also converts other elements of the free nonelectric Aether into mass-energy (and thus monopolar electricity) and into gravitational energy.
Armed with these findings, we are bound to conclude that the CBR does not present any direct or indirect evidence that permits its interpretation as a fossil radiation, or its being construed as proof for an originary hadronic era of the universe. On the contrary, the CBR constitutes instead effective evidence for the continued cosmological generation or ongoing production of leptons, and the very eternity of the cosmos."
http://www.aetherometry.com/Electron...abs-AS2v2B.php
)) or a layer inside the Sun. The latter is even worse for his idea because the Sun is measured to get hotter with depth.