Your previous comments led me to believe that you believe that the Germans attacked Poland to regain lands lost in the Versailles treaty - is this correct?
Partly. The most pressing reason was the assault on German minorities in Poland. But indeed also about Danzig and the corridor. And the mobilization of the Polish army. And the agressive intentions of the Poles themselves. Have a look at this impressive documentary. Interestingly with German voices of which I am sure I heard them om German national television. There is something int he air:
Youtube
Non-kosher source
Ah 9/11 your Dutch language paranoid rant about my getting done in by an uprising was amusing except for one tiny point. I'm not Dutch - but I see why you put it out in Dutch as in English it would have made you look sick, violent, demented and wishing death to those that disagree with you - not something the mods would support I would think.
Interesting accusation. I never threatened our friend Hans here. Just making predictions, refering back to a post Hans himself wrote, as well as his ideological pall ddt:
Hans:
"
What did you think of Anton's treason against the Dutch?"
ddt:
"You forgot to ask how nein11 thinks about Anton. Or rather, I'd be more interested to know how he thinks about Meinout."
Both are gleefully refering to
Anton Mussert, the Dutch national socialist, who got shot after the war. They both assume that I deplore that he got shot, because they assume that I have sympathy for national socialism. They are wrong. Not that I am going to put a iota of effort in denying that I am a Nazi. I am going to be smeared anyway into being a Nazi. Smearing is the essence of people of low character. A better strategy is to openly encourage to be smeared as a Nazi. At least in that case you don't bow for their tirannical political correctness. So Hans and ddt implicitly support the shooting of Mussert
because of treason of the Dutch people. But now they put themselves on a slippery slope.
Because they are traitors themselves (I was assuming at the time that both Hans and ddt were Dutch, because they both seemed to be able to speak Dutch, a rare quality among non-Dutch people). They both are incurable lefties, meaning advocates of unhindered third world immigration. In effect they do the same thing as Mussert: they cooperate with an invading hostile force. Where it must be added that these new tribal invaders are hostile to our society, especially the muslim ones, who are only here for the handouts. Unlike the Nazis, who considered the Dutch as even more Aryan (blonder) as themselves.
According to a leading MSM outlet, quoting state produced data, 50% of the young Moroccans have criminal records. The other 50% probably never gets caught. This means we have imported a bunch of criminals. The resistance in Holland meanwhile is massive. The openly anti-Islamic PVV (my party) is the third party in parliament and by far leading in the polls. And this is only the beginning. Wilders will be a speaker at ground zero next month protesting the building of a mosque (the idiots still think that muslims carried out 9/11
). Even crypto muslim Obama supports that mosque. Refering to the 'sick violence'... I merely suggested that what happened to Mussert, will also happen to the proponents of the desaster that is unfolding in Holland and everywhere else in the Eurosphere. You really think that history is over? You really think that this society is going to remain stable for the next 2 billion years until the sun is burned up, while we will be watching television, watching sit-coms and making fun about Hitler? Dream on. Eurosphere will morph into a chaos of competing tribes, until the myth of the happy multicult utopia will explode, America first for demographic reasons. This process will be greatly stimulated by the coming scarcity of resources,
when the party is over. And then it will be every ethnicity for itself. And then the likes of Hans will experience the hard way what it means to be treasonous against your own people. As Mussert found out.
So you remain terrified of me and still have me on ignore - would someone please copy this so or 9/11 can see it.
I am fighting voluntarily against everybody here, In fact it is the reason why I am here in the first place: to look for a fight and opposition, not to waste my precious time here on an ego-trip. So why should I be impressed by you? You really think you are something special, right? I kicked your Dutch-speaking b*tt because of your stalking tactics, wrapped in endless smears, invariably added with 'LOL', to indicate when the 'humor' starts.
I made my aims clear many times: the goal is a blog. From my 9/11 experiences I know how effective these can be, with a lot of traffic. In order to write a blog I have to morph my existing intuitions into hardened knowledge, laid down in blog text. That's were you guys come in: giving you an opportunity to criticise 'my' thesis so that they (and I) become battle hardened in the process.
Lets see how good his knowledge of history is and if he answers my question above - LOL
The level of my knowledge is not that relevant. Never claimed to be an original historian. But I am an effective summarizer. And integrator of knowledge. I am using Buchanan's text as the basis and add video's, wiki pages and other resources to it. And the Jew-stuff that Buchanan can't touch. My aim is propagandistic: to use the internet and it's resources to further spread revisionist material like that of Buchanan.
But you are useless. Hence you stay on ignore. Keep on thinking that you terrify me. LOL
