• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Coast to Coast AM Debate, August 21 2010

That was four hours? Didn't feel like it, although I missed 25 minutes for a phone call.

Excellent stuff tonight. Honestly, I don't think it changed anyone's minds -- you could tell by the callers that they still believe there are many unaddressed issues.

I just really wanted some no planers to call in.
 
Excellent stuff tonight. Honestly, I don't think it changed anyone's minds -- you could tell by the callers that they still believe there are many unaddressed issues.

This is actually good news for us.

It shows, once again, there is nobody "on the fence." Nobody at all.

Also, since all those listening are basically dyed-in-the-wool Truthers, if anyone's mind is changed, it's a win for rationality. I expect it to stay status quo, of course -- never once thought this debate would go anywhere new. It's quite surreal talking to these people in debate.
 
That was four hours? Didn't feel like it, although I missed 25 minutes for a phone call.

Excellent stuff tonight. Honestly, I don't think it changed anyone's minds -- you could tell by the callers that they still believe there are many unaddressed issues.

I just really wanted some no planers to call in.

I thought one of them was a no-planer. He talked about no jet fuel outside the building and I was thinking, "Where are you going with this one?" (As I did with most of those callers actually).

Do you know if that's where he was going?
 
he just wanted to know why the jet fuel didn't spill out side of the building and the fire burning it as it did.

He forgets that the momentum of the plane would have sent the jetfuel in one direction, so why would it flow "back" out of the building?

Not one of the callers had a pointed question for Gage, which was disappointing since I thought it was supposed to even out.
 
I thought one of them was a no-planer. He talked about no jet fuel outside the building and I was thinking, "Where are you going with this one?" (As I did with most of those callers actually).

Do you know if that's where he was going?

I don't think so. He referred to the jet actually hitting the building. Whether or not that could be a pod or *shadow thingy*, I don't know -- but I don't think so. I see what you mean, though. I guess by "no planer," I really mean folks who think it was the Death Star's directed energy weapon.
 
Well for those who want to catch the debate again, C2C is going through their repeat at this hour, so tune in, if you missed

And this is my cue to bid everyone a good night
 
I thought one of them was a no-planer. He talked about no jet fuel outside the building and I was thinking, "Where are you going with this one?" (As I did with most of those callers actually).

Do you know if that's where he was going?

That's what I thought, why bring it up otherwise?

Anyway, good job there Dave. The end result was about what was to be expected given the format you had to work with but you got some good information out there. Pity that it won't change anyones mind but it was fun to listen to so I guess that I got what I wanted out of it.

They just started to rerun the first hour here so I'll get the part I missed recording at first. I'll post it here once I clean it up as well as I can, there were some parts that the internet feed couldn't keep up with.
 
No jrefer's got on then ?

No. :(
Were you the last caller?

What sucked was that I finally called in to a line that wasn't busy, it just kept ringing. But then I heard the same busy signal sound as that heard on the show...I never talked to a phone screener so I doubt it would have gotten on had the phones not messed up.

The melting temperature of phones is unattainable without nanothermite. The Truthers were just about to blow the lid off the whole conspiracy until the government stepped in.

I did use my nanothermite-painted phone to call in so.....
 
This is actually good news for us.

It shows, once again, there is nobody "on the fence." Nobody at all.

Also, since all those listening are basically dyed-in-the-wool Truthers, if anyone's mind is changed, it's a win for rationality. I expect it to stay status quo, of course -- never once thought this debate would go anywhere new. It's quite surreal talking to these people in debate.

lol
 
The new thing for me was Niels Harritt who I thought would talk the most on thermite...I feel kind of naive thinking that he would be more technical in retrospect.

What really sucked was that Johnson made some specific claims about Harritt's paper that I wish Harritt would have had more time to respond to.

I also enjoyed Johnson calling Harritt out on publishing his work in a vanity rag.
 
The new thing for me was Niels Harritt who I thought would talk the most on thermite...I feel kind of naive thinking that he would be more technical in retrospect.

What really sucked was that Johnson made some specific claims about Harritt's paper that I wish Harritt would have had more time to respond to.

I also enjoyed Johnson calling Harritt out on publishing his work in a vanity rag.

Even though it's not true...(see hyperlink)

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6252869&postcount=328 hyperlink
 
Last edited:
Well for those who want to catch the debate again, C2C is going through their repeat at this hour, so tune in, if you missed

And this is my cue to bid everyone a good night

Does anyone have any idea when it will be repeated again? I missed the first fragment of this repetition.

(ETA: and the whole live show too)
 

Back
Top Bottom