fourtoe
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2008
- Messages
- 1,029
I hope you get on Colobus.
The phone meltdown kicked me off!
I hope you get on Colobus.
The phone meltdown kicked me off!
The phone meltdown kicked me off!
Excellent stuff tonight. Honestly, I don't think it changed anyone's minds -- you could tell by the callers that they still believe there are many unaddressed issues.
That was four hours? Didn't feel like it, although I missed 25 minutes for a phone call.
Excellent stuff tonight. Honestly, I don't think it changed anyone's minds -- you could tell by the callers that they still believe there are many unaddressed issues.
I just really wanted some no planers to call in.
I thought one of them was a no-planer. He talked about no jet fuel outside the building and I was thinking, "Where are you going with this one?" (As I did with most of those callers actually).
Do you know if that's where he was going?
I thought one of them was a no-planer. He talked about no jet fuel outside the building and I was thinking, "Where are you going with this one?" (As I did with most of those callers actually).
Do you know if that's where he was going?
No jrefer's got on then ?
Were you the last caller?
The melting temperature of phones is unattainable without nanothermite. The Truthers were just about to blow the lid off the whole conspiracy until the government stepped in.

This is actually good news for us.
It shows, once again, there is nobody "on the fence." Nobody at all.
Also, since all those listening are basically dyed-in-the-wool Truthers, if anyone's mind is changed, it's a win for rationality. I expect it to stay status quo, of course -- never once thought this debate would go anywhere new. It's quite surreal talking to these people in debate.
Well done Mr. Thomas.
The new thing for me was Niels Harritt who I thought would talk the most on thermite...I feel kind of naive thinking that he would be more technical in retrospect.
What really sucked was that Johnson made some specific claims about Harritt's paper that I wish Harritt would have had more time to respond to.
I also enjoyed Johnson calling Harritt out on publishing his work in a vanity rag.
Even though it's not true...(see hyperlink)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6252869&postcount=328 hyperlink
Well for those who want to catch the debate again, C2C is going through their repeat at this hour, so tune in, if you missed
And this is my cue to bid everyone a good night