By your definition, an altered recording would have gone back to the beginning of time.The video recording that Danny Jowenko viewed was not altered from its beginning to its end. Nothing was extracted, modified or added.The producers did not 'lead' Danny's opinion. They showed him the video. He was then quite free to ask qualifying questions.They answered every question openly and honestly.A year later, Danny Jowenko stood by his original opinion that fire could not have caused the collapse of WTC7.
Do you even read your posts? I mean, I know you are aching to believe that it is an inside jobby job, and that you cling to a person, who by your own admission was “blindsided” and hasn’t been heard from in three years, like a desperate sailor clings to a piece of driftwood after a shipwreck.
Lets review:
“By your definition, an altered recording would have gone back to the beginning of time.” Notably you remove the phrase “
of the collapse” from my post. Very notable, isn’t it, because the inclusion of that phrase would have demonstrated how specious your comment was. Did
the collapse got back to the end of time, MM? Of course not, so why do you create such ridiculous straw men?
“The video recording that Danny Jowenko viewed was not altered from its beginning to its end.” Have you never heard of
fraud by omission MM, because the video he was shown is the very definition of cherry picking, outright fraud.
“The fact that it was without sound would have been immediately obvious…” And that is one of the MANY reasons that Jowenko was INCOMPETENT in giving an off the cuff opinion
“The producers did not 'lead' Danny's opinion. They showed him the video. He was then quite free to ask qualifying questions.” Of course they did, I know you don’t think so because this is almost a religious issue to you, and Jowenko is your prophet,
but they lied to him about the location of the initiation of the collapse, and Jowenko incompetently failed to ask basic questions like, Is there another video? Is there one with sound? Should I really be answering questions when i can see about 25% of the exterior of the building? His failure, MM, is your failure. I’ve addressed the phone call that was surreptitiously recorded on a number of occasions (or was that Bob and Doug McKenzie?) and you know, Jowenko was an idiot for repeating his embarrassment to some toque wearing douchebag.
“You apparently do not understand what a lie is, which would account for why you do it so much.” And once again you accuse me of lying. Is that one of the sacraments of the Holy Church of Jowenko, MM?
Have a Blessed Church of the Twoof Day
