ergo
Illuminator
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 4,339
According to your understanding of physics, is the bolded part a correct statement. Yes or no.
I really don't know how they load trucks from silos. Please explain it to us.
According to your understanding of physics, is the bolded part a correct statement. Yes or no.
Anyone got a used dodge for sale? Oh yeah, Big Al does.
I really don't know how they load trucks from silos. Please explain it to us.
So when loading trucks from a silo, they just dump everything in at once because it doesn't impart any more force on the truck than if they let it out slowly?
Yes, gravity is pulling all things in the same direction. Resistance of other objects causes those things to move in other directions. The pieces of rubble are not all moving in the same direction.
The bolded is incorrect.
"Different vectors"? Wouldn't that be the building below (in this case)?
No, those would be the horizontal and rebound pathways that the rubble particles take when they hit the intact building components. This is how the energy is dispersed. It is not crushing the building.
No, those would be the horizontal and rebound pathways that the rubble particles take when they hit the intact building components. This is how the energy is dispersed. It is not crushing the building.
Therefore, no, your statement about the lower building does not follow.
Do you think it takes less braking force to stop a cement mixer full of wet cement, in which all the mixed granules are separate from each other and due to the truck's rotating barrel are all moving in different directions, than to stop another cement mixer filled with an equal weight of solidified cement with its barrel rotation turned off, assuming the same truck speed and the same stopping distance?
Why, or why not?
Crushing is energy being dispersed. That's the whole point of crumple zones, airbags, etc.
This is an incorrect analogy. We are talking about linear momentum of a system of particles. You are talking here about a truck carrying a load.
How did they get "horizontal"? They had to impact something that was "down", right?No, those would be the horizontal and rebound pathways that the rubble particles take when they hit the intact building components. This is how the energy is dispersed. It is not crushing the building.
Therefore, no, your statement about the lower building does not follow.
This is an incorrect analogy. We are talking about linear momentum of a system of particles. You are talking here about a truck carrying a load.
I really don't know how they load trucks from silos. Please explain it to us.
So when loading trucks from a silo, they just dump everything in at once because it doesn't impart any more force on the truck than if they let it out slowly?
A truck isn't a system of particles?![]()
It's not the same laws?Are we discussing particle physics or laws of motion? If we're discussing particles, why not discuss your intact upper block as a system of particles?


How did they get "horizontal"? They had to impact something that was "down", right?
It's not the same laws?
They impacted the intact components of the building, yes. As I stated before. These components are not crushed; they deflect the rubble pieces, which then have to move in another direction. This is what resistance is. This is what we mean when we say "unless acted on by another object". Energy gets dispersed into different directions.