Danny Jowenko - Manipulated by 9/11 Deniers

[The Big Dog]

It is very reassuring that truth and honesty now prevail in bidding processes.

Much like the honesty on Wall Street maintained by corporate fear of the law.

I'll let Danny know that in America honest folk have nothing to fear...well, except maybe those dishonest folk in powerful positions.

MM

This is one of those pointless posts that proves just how bad truthers are at reading, and how bad they are at thinking.

Hey genius, while we Americans appreciate your offer to call Jowenko from Canada, you should realize that the bidding process to which they were discussing was the European process.

Oh, but great post otherwise. You let "Danny know." Will ya? Seeing as how he has been SO active in Da Twoof movement these last few years. bwahahahaha! Can I get a laughing dog here?

 

[bill smith]

This is one of those pointless posts that proves just how bad truthers are at reading, and how bad they are at thinking.

Hey genius, while we Americans appreciate your offer to call Jowenko from Canada, you should realize that the bidding process to which they were discussing was the European process.

Oh, but great post otherwise. You let "Danny know." Will ya? Seeing as how he has been SO active in Da Twoof movement these last few years. bwahahahaha! Can I get a laughing dog here?

The only burning question rhat MM needs to ask Danny is whether he still believes that WTC1 and WTC2 were not controlled demolitions. (In my opinion)

 

[Miragememories]

The only burning question rhat MM needs to ask Danny is whether he still believes that WTC1 and WTC2 were not controlled demolitions. (In my opinion)

Well Bill, if I was Danny's wife I would ask him.

What the circus here fail to grasp is that few people want the notoriety
of challenging the Official Conspiracy Theory.

It is quite clear that unless Danny is willing to withdraw his professional opinion that WTC7
could in no way have been felled by fire, he has to reverse his opinion about the Twin Towers.

Of course the sandbox liars and cowards that permeate this forum have no idea how much bravery
is required to take a stand against majority opinion.

MM

 

[The Big Dog]

Well Bill, if I was Danny's wife I would ask him.

What the circus here fail to grasp is that few people want the notoriety
of challenging the Official Conspiracy Theory.

It is quite clear that unless Danny is willing to withdraw his professional opinion that WTC7
could in no way have been felled by fire, he has to reverse his opinion about the Twin Towers.

Of course the sandbox liars and cowards that permeate this forum have no idea how much bravery
is required to take a stand against majority opinion.

MM

His professional opinion? You knucklehead, weren't you the one who said he was blind sided? What a ridiculous piece of nonsense. Jownko was an idiot to give an off the cuff opinion to a pack of unscrupulous frauds, like the truthers.

In fact he was blind sided, by known liars, who misrepresented the facts, and showed him a doctored video.

And you know what, if he is your best, you guys are bigger losers than I thought.

 

[uke2se]

Of course the sandbox liars and cowards that permeate this forum have no idea how much bravery
is required to take a stand against majority opinion.

MM

Especially when you're flat out wrong, am I right?

Oh wait... that's not bravery. That's just being stupid.

ETA: Oh, and speaking of cowards, what have you done to act against the people you perceive as the murderers of the victims of 9/11?

 

[DGM]

Well Bill, if I was Danny's wife I would ask him.

What the circus here fail to grasp is that few people want the notoriety
of challenging the Official Conspiracy Theory.

It is quite clear that unless Danny is willing to withdraw his professional opinion that WTC7
could in no way have been felled by fire, he has to reverse his opinion about the Twin Towers.

Of course the sandbox liars and cowards that permeate this forum have no idea how much bravery
is required to take a stand against majority opinion.

MM

The point you miss is he has never made an "official" statement about anything.

* If he actually has, please link to it and I will retract.*

 

[Miragememories]

The point you miss is he has never made an "official" statement about anything.

* If he actually has, please link to it and I will retract.*

W R O N G

His interview was presented on the Dutch news program "Zembia Investigates 9/11 Theories (2006).

If that is not an official enough statement, I don't know what is ! ! !

You made just another sieg heil from the OCT gallery DGM.

MM

 

[DGM]

W R O N G

His interview was presented on the Dutch news program "Zembia Investigates 9/11 Theories (2006).

If that is not an official enough statement, I don't know what is ! ! !

You made just another sieg heil from the OCT gallery DGM.

MM

Wow, we have a "gallery"?

OK so his statement on WTC 1& 2 are on par? Glad you cleared that up.

I retract that he has not made an "official" statement.

 

[uke2se]

ETA: Oh, and speaking of cowards, what have you done to act against the people you perceive as the murderers of the victims of 9/11?

So, how about it MM? How has your brave self acted to oppose the murderers on 9/11?

 

[bill smith]

His professional opinion? You knucklehead, weren't you the one who said he was blind sided? What a ridiculous piece of nonsense. Jownko was an idiot to give an off the cuff opinion to a pack of unscrupulous frauds, like the truthers.

In fact he was blind sided, by known liars, who misrepresented the facts, and showed him a doctored video.

And you know what, if he is your best, you guys are bigger losers than I thought.

Nope. Danny confirmed in no uncertain terms a year later that his professional opinion is that WTC7 WAS a controlled demoliton. Forget the so-called blindsiding. It matters not at all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDxF9uEf4 Jeff Hill/Danny Jowenko

 

[Miragememories]

So, how about it MM? How has your brave self acted to oppose the murderers on 9/11?

Have you looked in the mirror lately?

MM

 

[bill smith]

So, how about it MM? How has your brave self acted to oppose the murderers on 9/11?

You must remember that most ordinary people are not heroes in the sense of risking theiir lives over 9/11.

"Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all."

 

[uke2se]

Have you looked in the mirror lately?

MM

I don't think the US government has anything to do with the attacks. You do. Therefore, you are the one who should act. You don't, which makes your use of the word "cowards" so much more hilarious.

 

[uke2se]

You must remember that most ordinary people are not heroes in the sense of risking theiir lives over 9/11.

"Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all."

For one, ordinary people don't believe twoofer idiocy. For two, MM attempted to insult non-twoofers by calling them "cowards". I was pointing out the huge irony.

ETA: MM, even Bill Smith thinks you're a coward. How do you respond to that?

 

[uke2se]

Nope. Danny confirmed in no uncertain terms a year later that his professional opinion is that WTC7 WAS a controlled demoliton. Forget the so-called blindsiding. It matters not at all.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDxF9uEf4 Jeff Hill/Danny Jowenko

And, in his equally professional opinion, WTC 1 and 2 were NOT controlled demolitions. Glad you have finally come to your senses.

 

[beachnut]

...
Of course the sandbox liars and cowards that permeate this forum have no idea how much bravery is required to take a stand against majority opinion.

MM

It is not bravery, it is ignorance.

Going for 9 years of failed CD delusions; a perfect stand of no evidence nonsense.

 

[triforcharity]

This is one of those pointless posts that proves just how bad truthers are at reading, and how bad they are at thinking.

Hey genius, while we Americans appreciate your offer to call Jowenko from Canada, you should realize that the bidding process to which they were discussing was the European process.

Oh, but great post otherwise. You let "Danny know." Will ya? Seeing as how he has been SO active in Da Twoof movement these last few years. bwahahahaha! Can I get a laughing dog here?

Heard you were looking for one of those laughing dogs....

 

[triforcharity]

Why is it that I always see the one video with Danny? Why don't we ever get to see both videos? I would like to see the first interview, then the second one, from a year later.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

And, in his equally professional opinion, WTC 1 and 2 were NOT controlled demolitions. Glad you have finally come to your senses.

Now now Bill is correct. It doesn't matter at all... That usually tends to be the case when his appeal to authority fails

 

[GlennB]

It is quite clear that unless Danny is willing to withdraw his professional opinion that WTC7 could in no way have been felled by fire, he has to reverse his opinion about the Twin Towers.

Translation:

His opinion on the Twin Towers, being a huge embarrassment in the light of our dependency on Jowenko's opinion on WTC7, must be destroyed at all costs. Using the tortured logic above I deem Danny to have reversed his opinion on WTC1+2, by default.

eta: too funny