• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

August Stundie Nominations

Travis

Misanthrope of the Mountains
Travis
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
24,133
Stundies are incredible abortions of logic and reason that relate to discussions of Conspiracy Theories. They are also funny. :D That's not a suggestion, that is a requirement.

Keep them short and sweet if you can and don't forget to include your source. Have fun. :)
 
I've heard people who believe the moon landing c.t.'s called Apollo deniers and moon hoaxers, but what do we call someone who believes the lunar missions were both real and faked? :confused:

noncooperation said:
It's BOTH - they went their & made studio images!

I didn't read every post, so i don't know if this has been mentioned.

I believe one or more of the moon missions did actually reach the moon. But just to make the whole media spectacle better they made photos & film footage in studios as well.

They then mixed all of this up to make a nice and confusing mess of evidence, for & against the moon missions.

I believe there was also an intentional cover-up going on here to hide the real reasons for the moon missions. some have suggested when they got there they discovered alien life etc. & these aliens politely told them leave and not come back!

Just adding my pennies worth to the thread.
Click to expand...


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059106528&postcount=228
 
In response to my pointing out that experts around the globe are not clamoring to point out a rather significant, alleged error in NIST's analysis of the WTC7 collapse (namely, that it supposedly violates the laws of physics), cmatrix shared this gem with us:

cmatrix said:
The number of people that agree with an analysis have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the merit of that analysis.
Click to expand...
 
I nominate this video, especially the part starting from 5:40 when this guy is saying that the WTC was hit by a top secret anti gravity drone shaped like a ball and that crashing an actual plane would be much more complicated and risky.
 
double_o said:
I nominate this video, especially the part starting from 5:40 when this guy is saying that the WTC was hit by a top secret anti gravity drone shaped like a ball and that crashing an actual plane would be much more complicated and risky.
Click to expand...

HA HA HA HA HA!!! The Pod thing still?!?!?! Obviously they have been hiding since ~2004
 
triforcharity said:
HA HA HA HA HA!!! The Pod thing still?!?!?! Obviously they have been hiding since ~2004
Click to expand...

i'd never heard of the pod,it's a really good idea though and seems the most likely explanation. Bet you didn't know that it was a boomerang that hit the pentagon, that's why there is no wreckage.:D
If the government had this secret technology it would be great, i'd love an anti gravity pod.
 
I can't watch any more of that, I can feel my IQ going down. Somebody tell me what it actually is that he's calling a "pod", please!

Rolfe.
 
And It's Alternate History, not Alternateive History.

http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showpost.php?p=3504695&postcount=32

Where to start on the stupid though...

Ok I've watched the only videos that have been released of the Pentagon and it clearly shows no airplane only an explosion. Also the terrorist who flew that plane was said to not even be able to taxi a cesna. But apparently he turned a 747 around in a maneuver described by pilots as impossible. And kept the plane only inches from the ground before crashing into the only section of the Pentagon that was being renovated and was reinforced better than any other part. And I never said a plane did not hit the Towers there is clear evidence of this. But a large number of witnesses claim to hear many explosions just before the Towers feel and when Building 7 feel. The victims were victims of the New American Century. And OBL has only been seen making comments about 9/11. And in one video were it does seem that he is admitting it. The Arabic is inconsistent says an highly educated Arabist. And that the translation was done by the DOD with no third party help. A FBI informant said he told the government about what several of the eventual terrorists were up to.
Click to expand...

And another one.

Come on do you honestly believe everything the government and the tv tells you. I actually found these things from good sources where is the lack of logic there.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I'm entering the following post by our latest no-planer, Obwon, for the Stundies.


Obwon said:
An essential part of the NPT are those claims that the planes vaporized on impact. Well, suffice it to say that for the planes to have experienced significant vaporization under ideal conditions, they'd have to have flown at mach 15 +. At 500 mph, the energy of impact is barely sufficient to raise the temperature of the metal 56 degrees f. So, we either need a new reason why there was no recoverable debris, or we must assume -- because 100 ton planes cannot simply vanish into thin air -- no planes actually crashed where no debris is present or seen.
Click to expand...


Let us count the absurdity:

1) There are claims of the planes vaporizing on impact.
2) Mach 15+.
3) No recoverable debris
4) Concluding no-planes is reasonable based on the above lunacy.
 
X said:
I'm entering the following post by our latest no-planer, Obwon, for the Stundies.





Let us count the absurdity:

1) There are claims of the planes vaporizing on impact.
2) Mach 15+.
3) No recoverable debris
4) Concluding no-planes is reasonable based on the above lunacy.
Click to expand...

Don't know about vapourising but I posted this, ages ago in the "Realistice" thread...


The variables are different, much bigger wall but presumably the Phantom is built a little more solidly than an airliner...
 
Travis said:
Stundies are incredible abortions of logic and reason that relate to discussions of Conspiracy Theories. They are also funny. :D That's not a suggestion, that is a requirement.

Keep them short and sweet if you can and don't forget to include your source. Have fun. :)
Click to expand...

While not necessarily a conspiracy in the generally accepted usage of the word (well, maybe trying to divest the treasury of some billions of dollars might qualify), the president of Canada's Treasury Board comes out with a real life Stundie.

Stockwell Day cites 'alarming’ rise in unreported crime to justify new prisons
 
Canada plans to arrest people for "unreported" crimes?
 
fitzgibbon said:
While not necessarily a conspiracy in the generally accepted usage of the word (well, maybe trying to divest the treasury of some billions of dollars might qualify), the president of Canada's Treasury Board comes out with a real life Stundie.

Stockwell Day cites 'alarming’ rise in unreported crime to justify new prisons
Click to expand...

Travis said:
Canada plans to arrest people for "unreported" crimes?
Click to expand...



Yes, I think Stockwell has finally driven me away from voting Conservative. Good job, Stocky.


And this soooo needs a comic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom