Victims' Family Members,
Titanic's post is as good a recent example as any of the emotion-based exploitation of your losses by those who support the common storyline of 9/11. There are many who completely forget that it was you, Victims Family Members, who were instrumental in calling for a 9/11 investigation when it became apparent that no such investigation was taking place.
Posts like that of Titanic seek to fill in the void created by the absence of a proper investigation by using your losses as a way of placing all emphasis upon emotional concerns, such that we are then consumed by sympathy and therefore unable to say: Wat a minute or Time out let alone I have a few questions I'd like to ask.
All such inquiries are effectively forestalled, stopped, halted and otherwise prevented as soon as these debunker posters go off on their emotion-proganda ploys like the one Compus is currently treating us to.
But, back to Titanic, let us here see for ourselves just how blatant the emotional propaganda ploy really is. Shall we? Let's begin:
Note that to the extent the above claim might have some forensic value, it is neither sourced nor demonstrated. It is simply claimed. Here we are what, 40% through Compus' victims eulogy ploy and there is no indication at all, after reporting on nearly 1/3 of the passengers what their movements or whereabouts were on 9/11.
It is useless to point out that Titanic hasn't proven his claim. Titanic "believes" it and, as we know, the common storyline of 9/11 is, indeed, a matter of faith and of belief. No investigation was ever done or needed as far as the faith-based community is concerned.
That is why their proofs tend to start out with claims like:
"...family members still in mourning..."
It would have been more honest for Titanic to say what was really being accomplished by use of emotionally tugging language like that. Here's the real message:
Do not question the fact that there has not ever been a proper investigation of what happened on 9/11. Instead, feel sorry for the victims.
Titanic then continues down the path inititated by the "mourning" appeal:
That is rich. Here we have someone who is doing all that is possible to deflect attention from the fact there has been no investigation, no proper forensic evaluation of what happened on 9/11 now asking the question of what happened?
The fact is, we do not know what happened because the event has not ever been investigated. Instead, the actual available information confirms 9/11 was a vicious shock&awe psyop that simulated plane hijacking and used pyrotechnics and high energy weaponry in the onslaught, coupled with an appeal to American xenophobia and Islamophobia.
Titanic, your use of rhetoric would be transparent in most contexts. You have not got the least bit of interest in determining what actually happened on 9/11 and your seeming question is just that: an illusionary inquiry; mere rhetoric.
You do not appear in your posting to ever call for an investigation of 9/11 or to even try to point to one that was valid. Instead, and at most, you rely on stupid debunker websites and newspaper accounts, like those being relied on by Compus, to try to support the common storyline of 9/11
Now Titanic has upped the emotional ante to the level of "body parts." It doesn't get more emotional than that, does it?
Yet, there is not one single source, link or confirmation of the claim.
Here's the fact: There is no valid, legitimate, reliable or admissible evidence of the body parts claim made by Titanic and I here and now assert that Titanic either will not try to prove otherwise or will fail if Titanic or some other debunker poster here even tries to do it.
Let's try this on to see if it can give a rise to the emotions on the NO PLANER side of the emotional ledger:
The claim of "body parts" or, putting it more politely, the DNA claims put forth by debunkers are false constructs supported, to the extent they are, by propaganda ploys. Such claims exploit victims family members, pure and simple.
There, debunkers, take that and I here assert you will either not try to prove me wrong; or, if you do you will fail.
When you fail, I will then assert that you need to retract your body parts claims and apologize to victims family members for engaging in ploys of that nature.
Clear?
P R O P A G A N D A writ large. Shame on you.
I have proven there exist no authenticated passenger lists. As to what it would mean as to who or what was "in on" what, that does not actually follow. I have already shown that "top secrecy" and "compartmented" information could render almost everyone out of the loop.
I'm sure there are many who have qualms and who want to be able to say "wait a minute" or "time out" or "I have a few questions" but the urge to go along in order to get along is too strong and the psyop of 9/11 too firmly implanted to allow that to happen, just yet.
Further, if you take a look at the actions of the airlines, it is clear they do not endorse the common storyline of 9/11; rather they merely, you guessed it, go along and get along.
This assertion has been proven by the following means:
1--No insurance payouts.
2--Governmental slush fund for airlines (hush money).
3--No authenicated passenger lists.
4--No actual statement of plane crashes.
I have elsewhere confirmed all of the above with the proper links and sources.
I can imagine that there are those who didn't see the links and sources when they were first posted; and, I might be willing to post them all again. However, I am going to here first point out that the post to which this replies contained not one single solitary link or source for any claim it made.
As such, this rebuttal is perfectly consonant with the post to which it replies.
You post your sources and I will then re-post the ones I rely on.
Titanic's post is as good a recent example as any of the emotion-based exploitation of your losses by those who support the common storyline of 9/11. There are many who completely forget that it was you, Victims Family Members, who were instrumental in calling for a 9/11 investigation when it became apparent that no such investigation was taking place.
Posts like that of Titanic seek to fill in the void created by the absence of a proper investigation by using your losses as a way of placing all emphasis upon emotional concerns, such that we are then consumed by sympathy and therefore unable to say: Wat a minute or Time out let alone I have a few questions I'd like to ask.
All such inquiries are effectively forestalled, stopped, halted and otherwise prevented as soon as these debunker posters go off on their emotion-proganda ploys like the one Compus is currently treating us to.
But, back to Titanic, let us here see for ourselves just how blatant the emotional propaganda ploy really is. Shall we? Let's begin:
Note that to the extent the above claim might have some forensic value, it is neither sourced nor demonstrated. It is simply claimed. Here we are what, 40% through Compus' victims eulogy ploy and there is no indication at all, after reporting on nearly 1/3 of the passengers what their movements or whereabouts were on 9/11.
It is useless to point out that Titanic hasn't proven his claim. Titanic "believes" it and, as we know, the common storyline of 9/11 is, indeed, a matter of faith and of belief. No investigation was ever done or needed as far as the faith-based community is concerned.
That is why their proofs tend to start out with claims like:
"...family members still in mourning..."
It would have been more honest for Titanic to say what was really being accomplished by use of emotionally tugging language like that. Here's the real message:
Do not question the fact that there has not ever been a proper investigation of what happened on 9/11. Instead, feel sorry for the victims.
Titanic then continues down the path inititated by the "mourning" appeal:
That is rich. Here we have someone who is doing all that is possible to deflect attention from the fact there has been no investigation, no proper forensic evaluation of what happened on 9/11 now asking the question of what happened?
The fact is, we do not know what happened because the event has not ever been investigated. Instead, the actual available information confirms 9/11 was a vicious shock&awe psyop that simulated plane hijacking and used pyrotechnics and high energy weaponry in the onslaught, coupled with an appeal to American xenophobia and Islamophobia.
Titanic, your use of rhetoric would be transparent in most contexts. You have not got the least bit of interest in determining what actually happened on 9/11 and your seeming question is just that: an illusionary inquiry; mere rhetoric.
You do not appear in your posting to ever call for an investigation of 9/11 or to even try to point to one that was valid. Instead, and at most, you rely on stupid debunker websites and newspaper accounts, like those being relied on by Compus, to try to support the common storyline of 9/11
Now Titanic has upped the emotional ante to the level of "body parts." It doesn't get more emotional than that, does it?
Yet, there is not one single source, link or confirmation of the claim.
Here's the fact: There is no valid, legitimate, reliable or admissible evidence of the body parts claim made by Titanic and I here and now assert that Titanic either will not try to prove otherwise or will fail if Titanic or some other debunker poster here even tries to do it.
Let's try this on to see if it can give a rise to the emotions on the NO PLANER side of the emotional ledger:
The claim of "body parts" or, putting it more politely, the DNA claims put forth by debunkers are false constructs supported, to the extent they are, by propaganda ploys. Such claims exploit victims family members, pure and simple.
There, debunkers, take that and I here assert you will either not try to prove me wrong; or, if you do you will fail.
When you fail, I will then assert that you need to retract your body parts claims and apologize to victims family members for engaging in ploys of that nature.
Clear?
P R O P A G A N D A writ large. Shame on you.
I have proven there exist no authenticated passenger lists. As to what it would mean as to who or what was "in on" what, that does not actually follow. I have already shown that "top secrecy" and "compartmented" information could render almost everyone out of the loop.
I'm sure there are many who have qualms and who want to be able to say "wait a minute" or "time out" or "I have a few questions" but the urge to go along in order to get along is too strong and the psyop of 9/11 too firmly implanted to allow that to happen, just yet.
Further, if you take a look at the actions of the airlines, it is clear they do not endorse the common storyline of 9/11; rather they merely, you guessed it, go along and get along.
This assertion has been proven by the following means:
1--No insurance payouts.
2--Governmental slush fund for airlines (hush money).
3--No authenicated passenger lists.
4--No actual statement of plane crashes.
I have elsewhere confirmed all of the above with the proper links and sources.
I can imagine that there are those who didn't see the links and sources when they were first posted; and, I might be willing to post them all again. However, I am going to here first point out that the post to which this replies contained not one single solitary link or source for any claim it made.
As such, this rebuttal is perfectly consonant with the post to which it replies.
You post your sources and I will then re-post the ones I rely on.
