Danny Jowenko - Manipulated by 9/11 Deniers

[Miragememories]

... and the lack of a tightly synchronised series of explosions and flashes. And the lack of flying glass from the unprepped building ...

WTC7 was not an undamaged building at the time of its collapse.

We know it had a large multi-story gouge on the south side as well as multi-story damage to its southwest corner.

This could account for the greater debris spread on the south and west sides.


MM

 

[Miragememories]

... and by claiming that a building with a collapsed mechanical penthouse and roof is "unblemished"....

That is a lie, I never said that.

MM

 

[GlennB]

... and the lack of a tightly synchronised series of explosions and flashes. And the lack of flying glass from the unprepped building ...

WTC7 was not an undamaged building at the time of its collapse.

We know it had a large multi-story gouge on the south side as well as multi-story damage to its southwest corner.

This could account for the greater debris spread on the south and west sides.

MM

Firstly, the greater debris spread was to the north (Fitterman Hall, West Broadway), not the south (Vesey St.)

Secondly, what do your points here have to do with absence of synchronised detonations, flashes and flying glass?

 

[DGM]

That is a lie.

MM

Why did you not correct C7 when he stated?

Columns 79, 80 and 81 supported the east penthouse. The failure of these columns occurred on the lower floors that cannot be seen in photo you posted. The windows probably broke because of the distortion to the exterior wall as the floors moved downward with the interior columns and pulled downward on the exterior wall until they broke loose and fell.

This seems to go against your theory.

 

[The Big Dog]

Yet in spite of all the solid interconnections with the exterior walls, hardly a blemish was observed.
MM

That is a lie.

MM

Cool story bro! Thanks for coming back, sport.

Remember folks, collapsed roof and penthouse is "hardly a blemish"! It's just a flesh wound!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4

 

[beachnut]

Remember this man talking about the WTC7 and how it was bought down by "bombs" due to showing only ONE video ?

Look what he says about the WTC, which 9/11 Deniers won't promote.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI

What is not in the tool box of 911 truth.
1. logic
2. definition of symmetry
3. truth
4. physics
5. math
6. research skills
7. structural engineering
8. fire science
9. fire fighting
An endless list... too much to list before a late lunch.

The people pushing the delusion of CD on 911 are habitual cherry pickers, leaving facts and evidence, and opposite opinions, behind for the occasional failed expert moronic conclusion. Danny becomes a double failure for 911 truth.

 

[GlennB]

Cool story bro! Thanks for coming back, sport.

Remember folks, collapsed roof and penthouse is "hardly a blemish"! It's just a flesh wound!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4

Why that link eventually led to me watching Eddie Izzard "covered in bees" I don't really know, but thanks for the laffs

 

[Miragememories]

"Your only point of "evidence" is that you "see" the building coming down symmetrically."

Myself and thousands of others, including the subject of this thread, Danny Jowenko.


http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/1149/normalcbsb7montno3.jpg

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9872/set3sccompositeua1.png

Edited by LashL: 

Converted spammed images to links.

Legal Commercial Controlled Demolition

MM

 

[tuc0]

Myself and thousands of others, including the subject of this thread, Danny Jowenko.

Illegal WTC7 Controlled Demolition
http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/1149/normalcbsb7montno3.jpg


http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9872/set3sccompositeua1.png


Legal Commercial Controlled Demolition
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3889/samplecdcomposite1cj3.png



MM

The sad (and funny) thing is that this really is the best argument you guys have. And it's a pathetic argument.

 

[beachnut]

Myself and thousands of others, including the subject of this thread, Danny Jowenko.

Illegal WTC7 Controlled Demolition
...

Legal Commercial Controlled Demolition

MM

The tiny building falling NOT symmetrical? lol

Illegal! lol, another lie based on; nothing.

That is funny, you show a non-symmetrical CD and the what looks symmetrical to you WTC7. Irony, you pick the leaning legal CD. See you are obsessed with Mark. Kind of a failure; no point is made and you failed to comment on the OP. This is off topic. Why not open your own thread to spew your failed ideas on WTC7 and stop SPAMMING the thread about Danny saying WTC 1 and 2 are not CD?

 

[twinstead]

I'll bet if you compared the video of the legal CD and the videos of the WTC7 collapsing and listened to them you'd find a very important difference. Do you know what that difference would be MM?

 

[DGM]

Myself and thousands of others, including the subject of this thread, Danny Jowenko.


MM

Thousands of people claimed to have seen Elvis after his death. What's your point?

 

[The Big Dog]

Myself and thousands of others, including the subject of this thread, Danny Jowenko.

Illegal WTC7 Controlled Demolition
[qimg]http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/1149/normalcbsb7montno3.jpg[/qimg]


[qimg]http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9872/set3sccompositeua1.png[/qimg]


Legal Commercial Controlled Demolition
[qimg]http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3889/samplecdcomposite1cj3.png[/qimg]

MM

Wow, it takes a special kind of fraud to keep posting that misleading photo of wtc7.

MM, you are SPECIAL!!

lulz.

 

[Miragememories]

The tiny building falling NOT symmetrical? lol

It is as symmetrical as what would be expected for a controlled building demolition.

Reference Example of a Legal Commercial Controlled Demolition

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/3889/samplecdcomposite1cj3.png

Some controlled demolitions have better symmetry than others, but all successful ones are complete, high speed implosions.

Illegal WTC7 Controlled Demolition

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9872/set3sccompositeua1.png

You were expecting controlled demolitions to display collapse symmetry with the precision of a cut diamond perhaps?

MM

Converted spammed images to links. Stop spamming the same images over and over again.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL

 

[carlitos]

I'm just curious.

The idea of comparing (sound free!) photos of a 10 story brick building being demolished by explosives with a 50-story steel frame building (on fire) ... was it yours? How did you get this idea?

For bonus points, are you familiar with the phrase "argument from incredulity?"

 

[Miragememories]

I'll bet if you compared the video of the legal CD and the videos of the WTC7 collapsing and listened to them you'd find a very important difference. Do you know what that difference would be MM?

Until you can show a high speed, complete building implosion, proven to be caused by fire twinstead, you are just blowing smoke out of your....

MM

 

[The Big Dog]

Until you can show a high speed, complete building implosion, proven to be caused by fire twinstead, you are just blowing smoke out of your....

MM

That is called DODGING THE QUESTION.

hee hee, MM, you are really, REALLY bad at this.

BOOM

 

[Miragememories]

I'm just curious.

The idea of comparing (sound free!) photos of a 10 story brick building being demolished by explosives with a 50-story steel frame building (on fire) ... was it yours? How did you get this idea?

For bonus points, are you familiar with the phrase "argument from incredulity?"

Show me a 10 story, or greater, concrete and steel building proven to have been successfully totally imploded and destroyed by fire.

Until you can, the silence of my images is irrelevant.

MM

 

[BigAl]

Show me a 10 story, or greater, concrete and steel building proven to have been successfully totally imploded and destroyed by fire.

Until you can, the silence of my images is irrelevant.

MM

Find a steel building that had fire and no firefighting.

There was no concrete getting in the way of the fire at WTC.

I bet Jowenko doesn't know that. Richard Gage (AIA) would never tell him.

 

[tsig]

Show me a 10 story, or greater, concrete and steel building proven to have been successfully totally imploded and destroyed by fire.

Until you can, the silence of my images is irrelevant.
MM

Almost poetic, definitely Stundie.