Undesired Walrus
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2007
- Messages
- 11,691
Surely the recent leak of over 91,000 documents relating to the Afghan war damages the theory that the 9/11 attacks could be kept secret in the age of extended media?
Surely the recent leak of over 91,000 documents relating to the Afghan war damages the theory that the 9/11 attacks could be kept secret in the age of extended media?
Surely the recent leak of over 91,000 documents relating to the Afghan war damages the theory that the 9/11 attacks could be kept secret in the age of extended media?
Surely the recent leak of over 91,000 documents relating to the Afghan war damages the theory that the 9/11 attacks could be kept secret in the age of extended media?
Prove it. Get a Pulitzer Prize. Your post qualifies you as a paranoid conspiracy theorist with zero evidence.The reasons that people inside of the US government intentionally and deliberately allowed the attacks on 9/11 to ...
"information" in the form of evidence. You get your information from idiotic nut case web sites of woo.If you are seeing this information for the very first time,
The reasons that people inside of the US government intentionally and deliberately allowed the attacks on 9/11 to take place was not kept secret, this information is now in the public domain from the US governmnet's own documents, and is available for all to see.
You are partially right, this information was not kept secret. But you are wrong as to "Wikileaks damage to alternative 9/11 theories".
Using the governments own documentation, which has this information that has not been presented to the American public by MSM, you can see exactly who took part in allowing the al Qaeda terrorists to carry out the attacks on 9/11, and even why, at least at the lower levels of the US large intelligence bureaucracies, people inside of the US government deliberately allowed these attacks to take place.
While you can then connect these people to people at very top of the US government, there is no documentation, that I have been able to find, as to why the people at the very top of the US government allowed these attacks to take place.
If you are seeing this information for the very first time, you are clearly not at all well informed as to what had occurred in the large US intelligence agencies prior to the attacks on 9/11 that had allowed these attacks to succeed. While the large MSM have not printed or provided this information, it is available with the most minimal effort for anyone that wants to know what had occurred that ultimately had allowed the attacks on 9/11.
Your post qualifies you as a paranoid conspiracy theorist with zero evidence.
You get your information from idiotic nut case web sites of woo.
OOPS!
The information from idiotic nut case web sites of woo are owned by the US government, in particular one of the most important web sites is for the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the web site for the 9/11 Commisson report and the web site for DOJ IG report.
Why don't you tell the US government that their web sites are "idiotic nut case web sites of woo".
I am putting together the list of these web sites and the people involved now, and will shortly provide you all of the web site links and even almost all of the names of the people who took part in allowing the attacks on 9/11 to take place and even provide you with the reasons they did this.
Surely the recent leak of over 91,000 documents relating to the Afghan war damages the theory that the 9/11 attacks could be kept secret in the age of extended media?
I am putting together the list of these web sites and the people involved now, and will shortly provide you all of the web site links and even almost all of the names of the people who took part in allowing the attacks on 9/11 to take place and even provide you with the reasons they did this.
ah...they only WANT you to think that!!
the 90,000 Afghan documents were purposefully leaked, by the NWO.
the goal? to make Obama the loser of this war, so that a stronger-bolder-more right wing Conservative will win the Presidency in 2012, and the Zionist plans can be finished!!
muhahahaha!!!
![]()
OOPS, You are right. You make up the woo, by taking information, messing it up so bad and twisting it; the web sites you think you get the "information" from are not "idiotic nut case web sites of woo", it was your web site that is an "idiotic nut case web site of woo". I made two errors.OOPS!
The information from idiotic nut case web sites of woo are owned by the US government, in particular one of the most important web sites is for the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the web site for the 9/11 Commisson report and the web site for DOJ IG report.
Why don't you tell the US government that their web sites are "idiotic nut case web sites of woo".
I am putting together the list of these web sites and the people involved now, and will shortly provide you all of the web site links and even almost all of the names of the people who took part in allowing the attacks on 9/11 to take place and even provide you with the reasons they did this.
OOPS, You are right. You make up the woo, by taking information, messing it up so bad and twisting it; the web sites you think you get the "information" from are not "idiotic nut case web sites of woo", it was your web site that is an "idiotic nut case web site of woo".
Had Freeh told Soufan that the CIA had given him this information in January 2000, that Khalid, Nawaf, and Salem , thought to be Nawaf’s younger brother, and all long time al Qaeda terrorists connected to the east Africa bombings, were all traveling to an al Qaeda planning meeting in Kuala Lumpur in January 2000, Soufan might have prevented the attacks on 9/11.
The reasons that people inside of the US government intentionally and deliberately allowed the attacks on 9/11 to take place was not kept secret, this information is now in the public domain from the US governmnet's own documents, and is available for all to see.
And if my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a wagon.
You've obviously never been part of a gigantic bureaucracy. Even in a small organization, crucial information is missed all the time if the signal-to-noise ratio isn't favorable.
You've obviously never been part of a gigantic bureaucracy. Even in a small organization, crucial information is missed all the time if the signal-to-noise ratio isn't favorable.
Surely the recent leak of over 91,000 documents relating to the Afghan war damages the theory that the 9/11 attacks could be kept secret in the age of extended media?