What's wrong with this definition of God: maker of heaven and earth and everything?

[Sun Countess]

I started if memory serves a thread on penis as the ground for an empirical inference to the existence of God, the necessary being creator of everything.

Yes, a particularly limp argument, as I recall.

Obviously many posters here are not mature.

Sayeth he who started the topic (and who prides himself on presenting evidence that a preschooler can understand).



Who created the tapeworm, yrreg?

 

[Paulhoff]

As regards penis and vagina as grounds for the empirical inference to God, I think I had stated as a preliminary remark that the threads were only for mature audience.

Boy, the door is wide open on that remark. It is way to easy to comment about you and being mature, damn I just did.

And since we are on those two subjects, is that the best design your so-called god can come up with, having the outhouse plumbing going right thru them, tisk tisk.

Paul

 

[EventHorizon]

I decided to also put up a thread on vagina and the thread actually came out.

*snicker*

 

[Complexity]

About penis and vagina

What do you know about either?

 

[bozman]

Anyone else read posts from folks like yrreg and think that signing every single post they make with their own name is narcissistic as hell?

 

[Complexity]

Anyone else read posts from folks like yrreg and think that signing every single post they make with their name is narcissistic as hell?

I was just thinking that was very odd of him, but 'narcissistic' works quite well.

What a peculiar person...

 

[154]

Anyone else read posts from folks like yrreg and think that signing every single post they make with their own name is narcissistic as hell?

Yep.

And as if anything need be said about "Greatest I am"...

 

[bozman]

In all fairness, all important documents usually end with a formal signing by the author(s). Consider the Declaration of Independence or The Mayflower Compact. Obviously, when words carry that kind of weight, the author has to sign it.

 

[blobru]

Colonists, what's wrong with this declaration of independence: no taxation without representation?







kcocnah nhoj

 

[John Jones]

Yep.

And as if anything need be said about "Greatest I am"...

Is he posting on this thread?

For the record, I've read a lot of his posts, and he at least tries to explain his position.

You don't even make a minimal effort. If you have offered anything other than loaded questions, juvenile sneers, and C&P scripture absent any interpretation, I haven't seen it.

If that is an incorrect or unfair recollection of your posting history, I'm open to edification.

 

[Ryokan]

I decided to also put up a thread on vagina and the thread actually came out.

Your thread came out of a vagina?

 

[bozman]

Your thread came out of a vagina?

Yeah but, didn't all of us come out of a vagina...

 

[Fiona]

About penis and vagina, obviously many posters here are not mature.




I started if memory serves a thread on penis as the ground for an empirical inference to the existence of God, the necessary being creator of everything.

When women posters here or whom I thought were women anatomically started to stray outside the drift to go into irrelevancies and obscenities, I decided to also put up a thread on vagina and the thread actually came out.


However, the people in charge before long locked up both threads.

That is my memory; the people in charge can correct me, though.



As regards penis and vagina as grounds for the empirical inference to God, I think I had stated as a preliminary remark that the threads were only for mature audience.

Obviously many posters here are not mature.





Yrreg

Is that really how you remember it, Yrreg? At least some of it is there for all to see...

 

[Aepervius]

I have always suspected that posting on JREF and hanging with the godless is a form of fundy porn.

I dunno if you are joking or not, but it IS a form of mental masturbation : they do their profession of faith, they do their little my-god-has-bigger-tea-bag-than-yours little dance, they show their supperior intellect over the poor atheist, which they know they can't convince and so they call them stupid, non thinking organism, evolutionist (in a pejorative way, not the historical term) etc...

Mind you atheist do it a bit too, in a way, but we (usually) don't go out of our way to troll over a christian fundie forum. Don't we ?

 

[Aepervius]

Yeah but, didn't all of us come out of a vagina...

Noper, some of us had a kiss-kiss with a caesarien, and the hand of a surgeon/nurse without ever seeing those dirty-dirty vagina (interrestingly such baby have a different darm flora/fauna composition and less varied than those which go through the vagina).

 

[bozman]

Noper, some of us had a kiss-kiss with a caesarien, and the hand of a surgeon/nurse without ever seeing those dirty-dirty vagina (interrestingly such baby have a different darm flora/fauna composition and less varied than those which go through the vagina).

Touche... I stand corrected.

 

[Ryokan]

Yeah but, didn't all of us come out of a vagina...

I once came inside one...

Sorry, I'll get my coat.

 

[yrreg]

Because guys here certainly cannot deny they have one and it is working (penis).

I am sure that when I started the thread on the penis (and later on the vagina) as empirical evidence via empirical inference that God is the necessary being creator of everything including and specially the penis (and vagina), it was because atheists cannot see the connection between their nose and God as the necessary being creator of everything that has a beginning, starting if they prefer with the nose in their face.

Why choose penis and vagina instead?

Because guys here certainly cannot deny they have one and it is working, also with gals here or true anatomical and physiological gals.



I will not any further continue with penis and vagina, unless you guys still cannot acknowledge that your penis and vagina are most intelligently designed and fabricated by God for the purposes you pursue with them, specially for the perpetuation of life first and foremost, then for the incentive of love and mutual delight.




Yrreg

 

[Mashuna]

I am sure that when I started the thread on the penis (and later on the vagina) as empirical evidence via empirical inference that God is the necessary being creator of everything including and specially the penis (and vagina), it was because atheists cannot see the connection between their nose and God as the necessary being creator of everything that has a beginning, starting if they prefer with the nose in their face.

Why choose penis and vagina instead?

Because guys here certainly cannot deny they have one and it is working, also with gals here or true anatomical and physiological gals.



I will not any further continue with penis and vagina, unless you guys still cannot acknowledge that your penis and vagina are most intelligently designed and fabricated by God for the purposes you pursue with them, specially for the perpetuation of life first and foremost, then for the incentive of love and mutual delight.




Yrreg

It was an argument that started out ridiculous, and it's gone downhill from there.

 

[RoboTimbo]

I am sure that when I started the thread on the penis (and later on the vagina) as empirical evidence via empirical inference that God is the necessary being creator of everything including and specially the penis (and vagina), it was because atheists cannot see the connection between their nose and God as the necessary being creator of everything that has a beginning, starting if they prefer with the nose in their face.

Why choose penis and vagina instead?

Because guys here certainly cannot deny they have one and it is working, also with gals here or true anatomical and physiological gals.



I will not any further continue with penis and vagina, unless you guys still cannot acknowledge that your penis and vagina are most intelligently designed and fabricated by God for the purposes you pursue with them, specially for the perpetuation of life first and foremost, then for the incentive of love and mutual delight.




Yrreg

Maybe you can get back to the topic of this thread then and give your definition of your god. Are you sticking with the definition that says your god only started the universe and has no other properties?