Jewish dance group stoned in Hanover, Germany

A dried matzo ball can also inflict serious bodily harm. Toss one at your neighbor's head, see what happens.

:)
 
Jews need to learn to throw the rocks back. Throw them hard and fast. Aim for the head.

That's what I'd do.

"I'm sorry I hit him with the rock, your honor..but he was trying to hurt me...and I had to defend myself."
 
Last edited:
Cavemonster said:
Try this for a start.

If that doesn't help, let me throw a hefty stone at your head and tell me how threatening you find it.
Click to expand...

And yet strangely you can provide no evidence. Amazing. And I don't mean securing them to the ground and throwing stones for a considerable period of time.
 
Last edited:
Thunder said:
Jews need to learn to throw the rocks back. Throw them hard and fast. Aim for the head.
Click to expand...

You want an escalation of violence?

There's a more lawful resolution to this situation, for those stone trowers to be thrown in jail.

You like the mob solution, I prefer the civic one. To each his own I guess.
 
Last edited:
quixotecoyote said:
And yet strangely you can provide no evidence. Amazing. And I don't mean securing them to the ground and throwing stones for a considerable period of time.
Click to expand...

You can't throw any stone at anybody, never, at least not in modern civic societies. It doesn't matter if it's deadly or not.
 
Thunder said:
what were Israelis doing smoking weed?

:)

joking aside, this is probably an good example of Muslims expressing legitimate anger...in illegitimate ways.

the Israeli govt. and many of its people have been doing very bad things to Muslims, and Muslims are right to be mad at them. but of course, violence against innocent people is never justified.
Click to expand...
Because no one ever attacked Jews prior to the creation of Israel.
 
Last edited:
quixotecoyote said:
And yet strangely you can provide no evidence. Amazing. And I don't mean securing them to the ground and throwing stones for a considerable period of time.
Click to expand...

I'm a bit puzzled that you used "deadly weapon" in quotes in the first place when I never used the phrase.

Ask absolutely any doctor or police officer, throwing rocks at someone is a serious attack that can result in serious injury or death, it isn't funny at all.

The idea that it needs to be proved to you that getting hit in the head or a bone with a rock is a serious and dangerous attack makes me wonder if you haven't already been hit with one.

Here is a list of people killed by rocks thrown at them after just a couple minutes on google. They were not secured down. Just attacked by stone pelting lunatics.
here
here
here

But you're right that a rock to the head is not always fatal, sometimes it's a minor injury and sometimes you get to have a fun time like serious brain injury!
Like this
Or this
or this
or this

It only takes a very basic grasp of physics, biology and common sense that a hard and heavy object thrown at another human being can cause serious damage. Your mother should have taught you that throwing rocks at people isn't funny. Amazing.
 
Last edited:
Cavemonster said:
Ask absolutely any doctor or police officer, throwing rocks at someone is a serious attack that can result in serious injury or death, it isn't funny at all.
Click to expand...

There's an important difference between "could" and "any reasonable likelihood". But please, if you disagree, feel free to get your beam-end over to the Bloody Sunday thread and defend the Paras. You know - the ones that shot the rock-throwing protesters. You know, what with it being a deadly weapon an'all.

here
Click to expand...


Evidence? Proper evidence, not cars driving under bridges at 60mph.
 
quixotecoyote said:
There's an important difference between "could" and "any reasonable likelihood". But please, if you disagree, feel free to get your beam-end over to the Bloody Sunday thread and defend the Paras. You know - the ones that shot the rock-throwing protesters. You know, what with it being a deadly weapon an'all.
Click to expand...

Wow, I almost get whiplash watching you shift those goal posts. I called the stone throwing a violent attack. One of the dancers was injured. You seem to need me to show that throwing rocks is guaranteed to kill before you will admit that it is a violent and dangerous attack.

How utterly odd.

quixotecoyote said:
Evidence? Proper evidence, not cars driving under bridges at 60mph.
Click to expand...

So, you read one of my seven links and stopped? And one that doesn't mention a bridge either!
Good job there ! Great reading skills and all that.

Once again, if you do not think this is a serious attack, (going in to pure hypothetical mode here) would you not call the police or be at all worried if a gang were running at you throwing rocks at your head? Do you really think that there isn't "any reasonable likelihood" that you could be seriously hurt?
 
Last edited:
Cavemonster said:
Wow, I almost get whiplash watching you shift those goal posts. I called the stone throwing a violent attack. One of the dancers was injured. You seem to need me to show that throwing rocks is guaranteed to kill before you will admit that it is a violent and dangerous attack.

How utterly odd.
Click to expand...

Can one or two thrown rocks, in theory, kill an adult? Yes. Is it a realistic threat? No. Is it a "deadly weapon"? Clearly not.

We've had a series of links where, despite the headlines, there is no evidence of serious injury beyond minor scalp woulds requiring stitches.

Am I going to be in the **** when someone figures out what I'm doing? Probably.
 
Last edited:
quixotecoyote said:
Can one or two thrown rocks, in theory, kill an adult? Yes. Is it a realistic threat? No. Is it a "deadly weapon"? Clearly not.

We've had a series of links where, despite the headlines, there is no evidence of serious injury beyond minor scalp woulds requiring stitches.

Am I going to be in the **** when someone figures out what I'm doing? Probably.
Click to expand...

Once again, you use "deadly weapon" in quotes, and as a benchmark, when it's a phrase and a standard that only you mention in this thread.

Throwing rocks is clearly a realistic threat since someone was injured. It's a hard heavy object.

Who's had a series of links with no evidence of serious injury? I gave you three links to deaths, and others to serious brain injury. What thread are you reading?

I ask you again: a gang of people surround you throwing stones at you, is that no cause for worry?
 
Cavemonster said:
Once again, you use "deadly weapon" in quotes, and as a benchmark, when it's a phrase and a standard that only you mention in this thread.

Throwing rocks is clearly a realistic threat since someone was injured. It's a hard heavy object.

Who's had a series of links with no evidence of serious injury? I gave you three links to deaths, and others to serious brain injury. What thread are you reading?

I ask you again: a gang of people surround you throwing stones at you, is that no cause for worry?
Click to expand...

Quad got it

Ah yes, these nasty rocks. Right up there with knives and guns. Of course.

Been over to the Bloody Sundy thread yet to defend that position?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom