• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Examples of U.S. Soverign Citizen (Freeman on the Land) Failures

Seriously, what part of the to/too thing is so difficult to understand? I know Bluekush doesn't have a clue what FOTL is actually about, but I'd like to think he can at least grasp this.
 
Something has to explain your muddled thought as exemplified by your muddled writing. From your screen name and your apparent obsession over legalizing pot, I thought (and still think) that overindulgence in weed is the explanation.

the complete ignorance you have. this doesn't even deserve a response.
 
Well there was that small thing called the Revolutionary War that made it possible for those Freemen to be free.

exactly so do we have too fight again? or will the system established on freedom stop cock blocking humans from being free?
 
Does this mean that your freeman membership card have to pre-date the mortgage in order for you to negate it?

Who hand out the freeman cards you use to prove your status to the courts with?

freeman membership card? you guys are making things up so you need too stop it.

And there is no such thing as negating a mortgage after you signed for it, that's fraud.

you guys can keep thinking you know everything about Freeman but you guys over and over prove you know nothing or blindly wish too be ignorant.
 
Last year we had someone who gave a somewhat coherent explanation of freeman theory. It was hilarious, to see the madness exposed so clearly.
 
Something tells me that person was not Bluekush. Is my psychic prediction correct?
 
perhaps you can give some examples of these good apple freemen

the founding fathers.

because it sounds to me like your saying if a freeman doesnt want to be prosecuted, he doesnt commit crimes, if he doesnt want to be in debt he doesnt take out loans, and i fail to see how this is different from any other citizen

yes but with the dismantlement of freedom in America in todays age, you don't have to commit a crime too be prosecuted.

you simply can ingest a few substances or not have proper paper work and you will have your free life taken away.
 
Seriously, what part of the to/too thing is so difficult to understand? I know Bluekush doesn't have a clue what FOTL is actually about, but I'd like to think he can at least grasp this.

whats so hard to understand that i dont care about misspelling to and too.

like i said nit pickers on grammar lose all credibility because you obviously have nothing else better to discuss.
 
yes but with the dismantlement of freedom in America in todays age, you don't have to commit a crime too be prosecuted.

you simply can ingest a few substances or not have proper paper work and you will have your free life taken away.
would these "substances" be the ones that its a crime to possess? because thats, well, a crime

so once again, it seems the freeman attitude is "i dont like these laws so i dont have to obey them" which was not the attitude of the founding fathers at all
 
He said in reply. :boggled:

Try again, none of this makes any sense.

I was being sarcastic .

And Im sorry but you and toke then have the cognitive abilities of a 5 year old.

re read what it was in response too first, instead of running your mouth.
 
Yes, but a bit too easy for the $1M. :D
50 cent challenge? :p
whats so hard to understand that i dont care about misspelling to and too.

like i said nit pickers on grammar lose all credibility because you obviously have nothing else better to discuss.
There's nothing else to discuss with you. You don't know what FOTL entails and your only contributions to the discussion have been to tell people that they're wrong and need to read the US Constitution. I can't put this any more clearly: you've said nothing that merits a reply. Pointing out where you can improve your language skills is the most useful thing anyone can do with your posts.
 
whats so hard to understand that i dont care about misspelling to and too.

like i said nit pickers on grammar lose all credibility because you obviously have nothing else better to discuss.
yeah sledge, he doesnt consent to your unjust laws of proper spelling and grammar!
 
Pointing out where you can improve your language skills is the most useful thing anyone can do with your posts.

Being able to write clearly is a major advantage if you are trying to get a message across on an internet forum.

And Im sorry but you and toke then have the cognitive abilities of a 5 year old.
We must be some of those prodigy kids, able to read and write early. :D
 
would these "substances" be the ones that its a crime to possess? because thats, well, a crime

so once again, it seems the freeman attitude is "i dont like these laws so i dont have to obey them" which was not the attitude of the founding fathers at all

Nope your Wrong. for a criminal offense too take place you need a corpus delicti or a body of the crime.

there's no jurisdiction without a body of the crime in criminal cases. and there is no body of the crime when it comes too drug use/sell/possession and why the laws are 100% unconstitutional.

Once again its the attitude that skeptics dont wanna get butt raped for being right they would rather stay tucked into a corner for being wrong.
 
That's what happens when you have stupid laws. Police and other people can ignore them.

By the way, it's -- I think -- still formally illegal for an American Indian to enter Boston (the original law passed in the colonial times was, apparently, never officially repealed). But I haven't heard of any arrests.

It would be cool if an Indian would make a point of walking in Boston and demand to be arrested so as to get the law off the books once and for all, come to think of it.

Or Jack Daniels being produced in a town where alcohol still cannot be sold. :D
 
Nope your Wrong. for a criminal offense too take place you need a corpus delicti or a body of the crime.

there's no jurisdiction without a body of the crime in criminal cases. and there is no body of the crime when it comes too drug use/sell/possession and why the laws are 100% unconstitutional.

Once again its the attitude that skeptics dont wanna get butt raped for being right they would rather stay tucked into a corner for being wrong.

Do you have any idea what "body of the crime" means? Can you give a coherent explanation of it?

And I have no idea what you mean by "butt-raped for being right" unless you mean being thrown in jail for standing up for FOTL. If that's the case, let me assure you, I am not afraid to stand up for a principle I believe in. FOTL is not one, since all evidence I've been shown to date consists of incoherent rantings, illogical constructs, wishful and magical thinking, all glued together with insulting rhetoric from people I don't think have working intellects. So, no, I won't be going to jail for this nonsense, thank you very little. I actually think the freedoms I do have are adequate, and don't require swinging a dead chicken over my head while muttering about admiralty courts and fringes on flags.
However, if it makes you feel better, I'll say this. You're 100% correct. It's all the big, evil people in charge, keeping us from enjoying our true freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. So, now what? Hmmm?






P.S. The truth contained in the last paragraph is 50% larger than the truth in all the FOTL points I've seen to date. (I think y'all can do the math.)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom