Something has to explain your muddled thought as exemplified by your muddled writing. From your screen name and your apparent obsession over legalizing pot, I thought (and still think) that overindulgence in weed is the explanation.
Well there was that small thing called the Revolutionary War that made it possible for those Freemen to be free.
exactly so do we have too fight again? or will the system established on freedom stop cock blocking humans from being free?
He said in reply.the complete ignorance you have. this doesn't even deserve a response.

Try again, none of this makes any sense.exactly so do we have too fight again?
or will the system established on freedom stop cock blocking humans from being free?
Does this mean that your freeman membership card have to pre-date the mortgage in order for you to negate it?
Who hand out the freeman cards you use to prove your status to the courts with?
Yes, but a bit too easy for the $1M.Something tells me that person was not Bluekush. Is my psychic prediction correct?
perhaps you can give some examples of these good apple freemen
because it sounds to me like your saying if a freeman doesnt want to be prosecuted, he doesnt commit crimes, if he doesnt want to be in debt he doesnt take out loans, and i fail to see how this is different from any other citizen
Seriously, what part of the to/too thing is so difficult to understand? I know Bluekush doesn't have a clue what FOTL is actually about, but I'd like to think he can at least grasp this.
would these "substances" be the ones that its a crime to possess? because thats, well, a crimeyes but with the dismantlement of freedom in America in todays age, you don't have to commit a crime too be prosecuted.
you simply can ingest a few substances or not have proper paper work and you will have your free life taken away.
He said in reply.
Try again, none of this makes any sense.
50 cent challenge?Yes, but a bit too easy for the $1M.![]()
There's nothing else to discuss with you. You don't know what FOTL entails and your only contributions to the discussion have been to tell people that they're wrong and need to read the US Constitution. I can't put this any more clearly: you've said nothing that merits a reply. Pointing out where you can improve your language skills is the most useful thing anyone can do with your posts.whats so hard to understand that i dont care about misspelling to and too.
like i said nit pickers on grammar lose all credibility because you obviously have nothing else better to discuss.
yeah sledge, he doesnt consent to your unjust laws of proper spelling and grammar!whats so hard to understand that i dont care about misspelling to and too.
like i said nit pickers on grammar lose all credibility because you obviously have nothing else better to discuss.
Pointing out where you can improve your language skills is the most useful thing anyone can do with your posts.
We must be some of those prodigy kids, able to read and write early.And Im sorry but you and toke then have the cognitive abilities of a 5 year old.
would these "substances" be the ones that its a crime to possess? because thats, well, a crime
so once again, it seems the freeman attitude is "i dont like these laws so i dont have to obey them" which was not the attitude of the founding fathers at all
That's what happens when you have stupid laws. Police and other people can ignore them.
By the way, it's -- I think -- still formally illegal for an American Indian to enter Boston (the original law passed in the colonial times was, apparently, never officially repealed). But I haven't heard of any arrests.
It would be cool if an Indian would make a point of walking in Boston and demand to be arrested so as to get the law off the books once and for all, come to think of it.
Nope your Wrong. for a criminal offense too take place you need a corpus delicti or a body of the crime.
there's no jurisdiction without a body of the crime in criminal cases. and there is no body of the crime when it comes too drug use/sell/possession and why the laws are 100% unconstitutional.
Once again its the attitude that skeptics dont wanna get butt raped for being right they would rather stay tucked into a corner for being wrong.