Mary_H
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,253
david marriot and i were hanging out yesterday. here is the picture i took of him. He is a pr machine!
Very funny!
Last edited:
david marriot and i were hanging out yesterday. here is the picture i took of him. He is a pr machine!
Mary H said:Again, you are taking all of this at face value because it was verified by the courts, which, because they are made up of people, are fallible and deserve scrutiny.
Maty H said:Yeah, I was pretty sure you wouldn't answer the question. AGAIN. Why do I keep thinking of Richard Gere's tap-dancing scene in the movie "Chicago?"
It's weaselly enough to continually evade serious questions about the evidence, but it's extraordinary that you would refuse to take advantage of a golden opportunity to educate someone like me who hasn't read the entire Matteini report. Why on earth would you want to deliberately withhold this information from someone?
You're too good to be true, Fulcanelli. Are you really the best the guilters have to offer?
Very funny!![]()
WHAT IS YOUR QUESTION????????????????????????????????
Now, I might be defying the marching orders of David Marriott, so please don't tell anyone, but this is where the "FOA" holds their weekly meetings..
Also, some of our paid bloggers on their way to post in various articles.
I bought and read Barbie's book. Which part of it did you think was less offensive: the part where she described Meredith's sex habits, her privates, and her bust line, or where she talked about how her and her reporter friends snickered at Meredith's British friends calling them the "7 virgins"?
And let's not even get started on her theory of the crime.
I'm wondering what this has to do with whether a source us trustworthy or not. The whole point you were arguing earlier is that Barbie is not a trustworthy source. Instead of evidencing that, all we are getting is your making personal attacks on her. If you have a VALID point to make, then make it.
For the third time:
Here is my straight question:
What evidence did the chief of police and the interior minister have that led them to describe the crime as they did? You can use Matteini's report to support your answer, since as I said, I don't have access to the whole thing.
Here is another straight question:
What evidence did the police (or prosecution, or judge) have that placed Raffaele at the crime scene?
Do you personally feel that Barbie was out of line when she wrote the private information about Meredith?
Do you personally feel that Barbie was out of line when she wrote the private information about Meredith?
No. She's writing a book, she has to write about the people she's writing about.
Okay, I'll waste my time and answer the questions to which you already have the answer to.
1. Amanda no longer had an alibi
2. Raffaele no longer had an alibi
3. They both admitted they alibis they had given were lies
4. Amanda admitted going to the cottage with Patrick and standing by as he raped and murdered her, then not telling the police after
5. There was the text message on her phone that made it appear she was meeting Patrick that night
6. There was the phone tap
7. Amanda also put Raffaele at the crime scene
8 Amanda and Raffaele's behaviour during their questioning
9. Patrick at that time could not provide a verifiable account of his whereabouts that night
10. Patrick's cell had pinged the mast near the cottage
11. Patrick had changed his phone the day after the murder and refused to give the police the number of his old one
12. Raffaele had a knife on him, which also happened to be compatible with some of Meredith's injuries
This was more then enough to make them suspects and arrest them.
HumanityBlues,
Why are you ignoring me? this violates rule #113 in the Marriott hand book. There will be a deduction on your May 2010, commission.
I previously wrote,
Have we met? Can you send me an email so we can talk? Thanks.
injusticeinperugia@yahoo.com
Well, thank you for going to all that trouble.
Isn't there anything in Judge Matteini's report that explains why the prosecutor, the chief of police, the interior minster and Judge Matteini concluded that the three suspects had tried to engage Meredith in sexual activity and then killed her when she refused? Remember, the medical examiner would not state Meredith had been raped.
Well, thank you for going to all that trouble.
Isn't there anything in Judge Matteini's report that explains why the prosecutor, the chief of police, the interior minster and Judge Matteini concluded that the three suspects had tried to engage Meredith in sexual activity and then killed her when she refused? Remember, the medical examiner would not state Meredith had been raped.
That would be down to Meredith being attacked by multiple persons and sexually assaulted.
For which, at the time of the arrests, there was no evidence.