The photo you have referenced does not show any balconys at all.
![]()
jammonius presents this evidence to show that 99 Hudson street has no balcony - on the 14th floor:
(My photo of course showed the whole building)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5889554#post5889554
jammonius presents this evidence to show that 99 Hudson street has no balcony - on the 14th floor:
(My photo of course showed the whole building)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5889554#post5889554
A picture of a printout of a google image?
fbenario said:If every "nuclear explosion" so far has been faked, why would it be hard to contemplate a fake nuclear explosion in a city? Who would stick around to test whether or not there actually is any radiation in the air?
Heiwa said:Actually there is no oil spill at all!! What happens is that solid, liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons mixed with old water trapped with it, all at high temperature and pressure, leak from the bottom of the sea and that some of it (some solid, liquid parts!) is seen on the surface of the ocean. There is no oil leaking!
It seems BP was just drilling an underwater oil well through a BOP, Blow Out Preventer, or christmas tree fitted on the sea floor. The well was not producing any oil at all! It was not yet connected to any system receiving 'live crude' and killing it so parts of it could become oil.
Anyway, in my opinion most of the hydrocarbons of all types escaping from the bottom of the sea will just evaporate or be destroyed by biological processes. The little floating solids on the ocean surface will also disappear by itself fairly quickly due to air and sun. Gulf of Mexico is warm water accelerating break down. Spraying things on it will just make things worse and some people rich.
In two months time the whole incident will be forgotten. Let's wait until then!
jammonius presents this evidence to show that 99 Hudson street has no balcony - on the 14th floor:
(My photo of course showed the whole building)
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5889554#post5889554

Ok, this is just disturbing, on so many levels:
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shack/index.php?showtopic=206
If we go back to the pre-Hiroshima nuke propaganda, we find talk of areas being urned into a glass parking lot where no life would be able to grow for the next 500 years. This obviously did not happen! Here are a few photos comparing the aftermath of a firebombing of Tokyo and the aftermath of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima. Are they very different other than that of the larger Tokyo having more surviving buildings? Is it possible that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as targets for this deception instead of a more strategic target like Tokyo because they were mainly filled with cheap light paper-thin wooden structures, thereby making the devastation of the firestorm appear more complete?
After two weeks all of a sudden I get this in my email:
911thology said:I am a very humble man and I have no ego at all in a sense you imply it. But it does not mean that any uneducated bastard devoid of any sense of politeness is entitled to conduct a discussion with me on his terms, hurling personal insults, etc. Sorry, I am a little bit higher than that. Can't you just imagine that there are people of a different social class and if someone who is higher condescend to a personal conversation with someone who is lower it should be appreciated, at least?
I'm nominating 911thology for this excerpt from the e-mail he sent to djlunacee, because it exhibits a level of arrogance above and beyond the call of duty for a conspiracy theorist.
We’ve largely sat on the fence regarding the whole “birther” issue, pointing out that there are legitimate arguments coming from both sides, but what’s not up for debate is the fact that Obama’s real name is Barry Soetoro, the name given to Obama at the time of his enrollment in an Indonesian elementary school.
Whatever the exact nature of the controversy, it seems inevitable that Obama is being blackmailed over his dubious origins, making it imperative that a proper investigation of the issue be conducted in the interests of both national security and the basic rule of law.