.
Funny, that PDF returns zero matches for the phrase "important components of the extermination," just to choose a distinctive combo at random.
It *does* however, in a search for "1945" state
In view of the advancing Red Army, the crematoria there had been blown up in January 1945 in an effort to conceal evidence.
.
...which makes your claim even less likely to accurate.
.
.
You have yet to actually *cite* this letter, or any experts who hold that opinion.
.
.
Even if all you claim regarding this letter and "the experts'" opinion thereof turns out being accurate, being taken in by a forgery would not make them a "hotbed of holocaust denial" and no reasonable person would make that assumption. One would have to assume that Mr. Ellard meant that they were aware that it was a forgery and were still actively promoting the letter -- and given that you *still* have not substantiated that this letter even exists ...
But let's run with this while you rig up a citation which actually supports your claims: what is *your* explanation for the fact that these muffles were not Topf's to sell, and that they were behind "enemy" lines as of the date the letter was supposed to have been written?
.
.
No, it would be called lying when *anyone* does it -- too bad you're the only so engaged in this thread...
.