A Flight 93 : WTC 7 connection

[beachnut]

You have self-debunked yourself. FL93 turned directly towards NYC, right before it spiraled out of control to the ground. (shot down)

The frequency for DCA was in the VOR, evidence from the FDR. The spiral was not out of control, the terrorists flew the plane into the ground using the flight controls, that is controlled flight into the ground because the dolts were chicken and being attacked by the Passengers so they maneuvered the plane off course and decided to crash instead of being beat-up by the Passengers. The Passengers who figured out 911 in minutes, something you can't do with 8 years and all the answers.


The plane was not shot down. Why do you have moronic delusions about 911 after 8 years?

No, you posted the flight path showing up to the time of the Passengers revolt 93 was headed to DC. Why is 911 truth always wrong on 911?

 

[Macgyver1968]

Jesus Christ...are we only left with severely mentally ill troofers now?

 

[Nursedan]

Jesus Christ...are we only left with severely mentally ill troofers now?

Were there ever any other kind?

 

[fess]

Only in a truthers mind is an airplane course pointed ESE and straight towards Washington DC is actually heading towards NYC.

Dover AFB... maybe?

 

[fess]

You have self-debunked yourself. FL93 turned directly towards NYC, right before it spiraled out of control to the ground. (shot down)

Woould you mind telling us what type of weapons were used to down Flt 93?

 

[T.A.M.]

Jesus Christ...are we only left with severely mentally ill troofers now?

I don't think Red Ibis is mentally ill.

TAM

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Woould you mind telling us what type of weapons were used to down Flt 93?

And why they would conceal that if it was?

 

[George 152]

Jesus Christ...are we only left with severely mentally ill troofers now?

What other sort has there ever been ?

 

[DavidJames]

I don't think Red Ibis is mentally ill.

TAM

I would like to hear what would cause someone to post 5k times about 9/11 CT over almost 3 years without acknowledging the evidence which refutes their beliefs.

 

[RedIbis]

I would like to hear what would cause someone to post 5k times about 9/11 CT over almost 3 years without acknowledging the evidence which refutes their beliefs.

What evidence?

 

[dtugg]

What evidence?

Everything that you ignore in order to maintain your fantasies.

 

[RedIbis]

Everything that you ignore in order to maintain your fantasies.

How do you ignore a missing column?

 

[KoihimeNakamura]

By ignoring all the other evidence.

 

[dtugg]

How do you ignore a missing column?

Who said a missing column was evidence?

 

[Dave Rogers]

How do you ignore a missing column?

That's kind of the problem. The only evidence you won't ignore is the evidence that doesn't exist.

Dave

 

[grandmastershek]

Well it sure seems to make sense. Given progressive collapse of buildings is a rather rare event, <B>Occam's razor</b> would suggest when 3 progressive collapses happen in a small radius and a small time frame that they would each have the same cause.

Ergo, planes were an optional extra for causing progressive collapse on 9/11.

And if that isnt a great application of the ol' shaving implement, I don't know what is.

Any heads up on the best truther site? And any views on the N175F thingy that youtube clip shows? I am sure it must have come up here before.

please don't throw around concepts you don't understand. occam's razor demands explanations based what we know exists (planes, and fires) and avoiding explanations based on what we do not (aka-needlessly multiplied entities like undetectable explosives).

secondly your misrepresenting the facts. the debris from the towers was spread for blocks. progressive collapse via the upper block is regularly demonstrated via the verinage technique. the fires and planes performed the job of weakening the beams to result int he collapse. and we know fires can cause collapses of steel framed buildings. how you performed a mental backflip to draw a conclusion that all 3 collapses must have the same cause is beyond me.

http://www.studyof911.com/articles/winstonwtc701/Images/Fig8.jpg

 

[RedIbis]

who said a missing column was evidence?

nist.

 

[RedIbis]

That's kind of the problem. The only evidence you won't ignore is the evidence that doesn't exist.

Dave

If the evidence doesn't exist, is it evidence?

 

[Dave Rogers]

If the evidence doesn't exist, is it evidence?

Truthers seem to set a lot of store by evidence that doesn't exist.

Dave

 

[GlennB]

If the evidence doesn't exist, is it evidence?

No, but reality can be tortured to create seeming facts which appear to bolster a claim. Some refer to this as 'evidence'.

Dustified steel, huge insurance profits, missing jolts. That kind of thing.