http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HIV-budding-Color.jpgFirst problem is, you have no idea what an HIV virus is, what it looks like, how to catch one or anyone who has every really seen one! For all practical purpose there is no such thing as an HIV virus just hearsay but I welcome you to prove me wrong.
You catch one in your little net, blood sample or whatever you need to infect me and we will do your little test. You will find they are more elusive than you have been taught!![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Herpes_simplex_virus_TEM_B82-0474_lores.jpgActually since proof is so important there is no proof that there is even such a thing as a herpes virus, just everyone taking it all in on faith. They test of antibodies and indication of what is said to be a virus but there is no way of detecting an actual virus through medical testing. Doctors have never seen the virus so you can't ask them for help. Lab tech only see one color of dye or another without seeing any actual virus.
Except for the fact that we can detect it, photograph it, sequence its DNA, and it is a virus and it is not a fungus so you are, as always, categorically wrong.For all we know OBs thought to be herpes could be a fungus and nothing to do with any virus. Unfortunately for the argumentative types there is no way to prove herpes is a virus or a fungus.
TraneWreck, did you think I came here to hear myself discuss?
No I am here to discuss cures for incurable diseases and I can prove they exist. Giving me the benefit of the doubt, as such it obviously proves that medicine is either inferior or corrupt or both.
So why would I seek approval from something as inferior as medicine.
Medicine cannot touch the capacity of the human immune response. Medicine has no place in regards to cures. Cures simple kill the golden goose.
Intended by whom?
Sorry I wasn't too clear. HSV subtypes cause both disease but HSV 1 used to be purely oral but has begun to cause a significant portion of genital herpes as well...hint hint...nevermind...Paximperium, I think you might be misinformed. There are still two viruses that cause Simplex (type 1 and 2). They can both cause sores at the site of infection. Commonly, simplex 1 causes cold sores and simplex 2 causes genital lesions, but you can have genital lesions caused by simplex 1 and cold sores by simplex 2.
No, you're just joking around. I hope you're enjoying yourself.
1350-no "Western Medicine," lots of immune systems. The Great Mortality almost destroyed the human species.
2010-"Western Medicine," lots of immune systems. Black Death has been completely controlled.
What's the difference?
Talk about extreme levels of stupid.Actually since proof is so important there is no proof that there is even such a thing as a herpes virus, just everyone taking it all in on faith. They test of antibodies and indication of what is said to be a virus but there is no way of detecting an actual virus through medical testing. Doctors have never seen the virus so you can't ask them for help. Lab tech only see one color of dye or another without seeing any actual virus.
For all we know OBs thought to be herpes could be a fungus and nothing to do with any virus. Unfortunately for the argumentative types there is no way to prove herpes is a virus or a fungus.
Actually since proof is so important there is no proof that there is even such a thing as a herpes virus, just everyone taking it all in on faith. They test of antibodies and indication of what is said to be a virus but there is no way of detecting an actual virus through medical testing. Doctors have never seen the virus so you can't ask them for help. Lab tech only see one color of dye or another without seeing any actual virus.
For all we know OBs thought to be herpes could be a fungus and nothing to do with any virus. Unfortunately for the argumentative types there is no way to prove herpes is a virus or a fungus.
Sorry I wasn't too clear. HSV subtypes cause both disease but HSV 1 used to be purely oral but has begun to cause a significant portion of genital herpes as well...hint hint...nevermind...
Cute. He doesn't even know how the Placebo Effect actually works.Steven,
Very good question.
You personally can direct your immune response with great effectiveness and you can direct others with great effectiveness. BOOM you just discover the root of placebo.
Better yet a person can learn to direct their immune response and use it to take care of their whole family just as nature planned before technology took over.
I'm well aware how odd this sounds. Everything in your being exist from an educational system that says you are to subscribe to medicine and medicine only. Now with the same people in charge of western medicine also in charge of alternative medicine both have become completely useless when it comes to cures or prevention.
You must ask yourself how does a double blind placebo work. The person applying the "remedy" is directing the patients immune response, not the remedy. With out the ability to direct immune responses in other there would be no PLACEBO.
You can direct your own immune response and you can direct others.
Sorry. You've been persistently wrong in all your claims, this one included. Forgive me if I find your "opinion" worthless.You are horrible misinformed on all accounts.
If you get syphllis or gonorrea you cure the diseases with anti biotics. You fail to use anti biotics your stuck with these diseases. I know from experience unfortunantly. Nothing you've been saying is true. Why dio you torture yourself?It is very easy to prove MEDICINE outside of trauma is all propaganda and lies. That was not the reason for the discussion but that is where the good doctors want to take it and I will do my best to expose medicine because so many seem to thing that cures and medicine are linked. They are not. Cures are not medicine.
15 years of failure. Oh well I'm glad the world actually has sense to ignore a complete kook that thinks that herpes viruses have not been seen and that wild animals don't get cancer.I don't joke about cures. I will happily take on the FDA, AMA and all of you who prevent people from understanding their immune response! That is my life's work. For 15 years I have been proving cures for incurable diseases exist and for 15 years I have been ignored my the media and medicine
(emphasis mine)Better yet a person can learn to direct their immune response and use it to take care of their whole family just as nature planned before technology took over.
ShareCures - you appear to have no idea what you're talking about, and seem to be just recycling unsupported claims. I appreciate that you may believe these statements, but they could be remedied with an attitude more oriented to learning than lecturing. I'm not quite sure at this point if you sincerely want to understand any of this.
As an example, I'm an immunologist which is a research specialty that studies the human immune system and microbial origin of infections.
Herpesviruses (they're a family of viruses that includes chickenpox) have been imaged many times with different tools, such as [SEM]. They're viruses because they look like viruses and their genomes have been recorded, and there's no doubt they're viral genomes. It's pretty easy to distinguish between viruses and fungi through multiple means - the convergence of multiple independent tests makes a strong argument for confident determination.
Practically speaking, the tools we use to impact their infectious properties work in the way we would expect from what we model of their biochemistry and physical constitution. eg: antifungals don't work on viral infections; antivirals don't work on fungal infections; penicillin doesn't work on either, but works on some types of bacteria. &c.