Amanda Knox guilty - all because of a cartwheel

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
I told your own people to gag you.

They should know what's at stake (I could be sarcastic and make reference to a million dollar PR campaign, but I won't).

Kermit, you make the mistake of putting all of us into one group. We are individuals that have stood up to fight an injustice. We are not all part of a big group run by a PR firm. You have the facts completely wrong.

Of course, I know that you simply use this tactic to try and discredit anyone that believes and injustice has occurred in this case.
 
I wonder why Barbie Latza Nadeau still sits high up on a pedestal with the PMF crowd. Her book is extremely disrespectful to Meredith Kercher. She mentions personal details about Meredith that have absolutely no bearing on the case. She does this simply to make money. Barbie should be ashamed of her actions. The title of her book is illustrated to look as if it is written in Meredith's blood.

Stop trying to smear anyone who believes that an injustice has occurred. Maybe you should be looking more closely at one of your preferred sources.
 
I wonder why Barbie Latza Nadeau still sits high up on a pedestal with the PMF crowd. Her book is extremely disrespectful to Meredith Kercher. She mentions personal details about Meredith that have absolutely no bearing on the case. She does this simply to make money. Barbie should be ashamed of her actions. The title of her book is illustrated to look as if it is written in Meredith's blood.

Stop trying to smear anyone who believes that an injustice has occurred. Maybe you should be looking more closely at one of your preferred sources.

I'm sorry Bruce, perhaps you could tell us who 'is' a reliable source on this case?
 
.
Well, if as of 24 hours ago you want to take the conversation along this road (instead of your allegations of multiple "perfect matches" with Rudy's Nike), that's fine with me.

I assume that you concede that they weren't all so "perfect".

Now, then, you have asked me several times in the last 24 hours something which you have also said we have been talking about for some time (UNTRUE, but par for your course).

And I have already told you: I don't know.

Not even the prosecution expert said "that partial shoeprint belongs to Amanda", but rather he limited himself to saying that it was compatible with her size 37 foot.

Why are you asking me to go beyond the prosecution expert's own words?

Okay, so we are all clear on this matter. There is no proof whatsoever that any shoe prints belonging to Amanda Knox are on the pillow.

We have absolute proof showing Rudy Guede's shoe prints on the pillow.

Kermit's stand is simply that he does not know if Amanda's shoe prints are on the pillow. He simply can't find the strength to utter the words; There is no proof whatsoever showing a shoe print on the pillow that can be attributed to Amanda Knox.

Lies about this subject have been spread throughout the media and these lies continue to this day.

Charlie Wilkes did an excellent job of explaining this.

Kermit has done absolutely nothing to set the record straight. He actually tries to distract people from seeing the truth with his nonsense about perfect matches and vibrators.
 
Kermit, you make the mistake of putting all of us into one group. We are individuals that have stood up to fight an injustice. We are not all part of a big group run by a PR firm. You have the facts completely wrong.
I have made myself very clear about how I feel about the Kercher family.

This is simply just another attempt to discredit me. It is extremely childish and it needs to stop.
Can you then please step up to bat for the Kerchers?

Please, tell Supernaut that her insults and insinuations (the Kerchers aren't dignified, the Kerchers are in this for the money ...) are intolerable.

If you do, then we can finally stand together on one issue, Bruce.
 
And actually, all those I've spoken to who 'have' read Barbie's book have said that Barbie treats Meredith with great dignity and compassion and her book is not sensational at all.
 
Perhaps I missed it, but when the police videotaped Raffaele's apartment on November 16 the "S trap" pipe under the kitchen sink was either missing or disconnect. Is this correct?
 
Can you then please step up to bat for the Kerchers?

Please, tell Supernaut that her insults and insinuations (the Kerchers aren't dignified, the Kerchers are in this for the money ...) are intolerable.

If you do, then we can finally stand together on one issue, Bruce.

It should be assumed from everything that I have said about the Kercher family that I do not approve of Supernaut's comments.

trying to highlight one person's comment to discredit everyone that disagrees with you is nonsense. That in itself borders on being disrespectful to Meredith's family. Stop using the Kercher's to try and discredit anyone that believes that an injustice has occurred.

Here are statements from my website that I have made in regard to this matter.

Many people that are currently following this case never had the opportunity to meet Meredith Kercher. We have all learned from her family and friends just how special Meredith was. No matter what conclusions you draw from this case, one thing is certain, Meredith's family, her friends and the world, lost a beautiful young woman, to a senseless act of inhumanity.

The Kercher family deserves privacy and respect. They lost Meredith forever. As we fight on to correct the injustice that has been committed against Amanda and Raffaele, we need to be mindful, that Amanda and Raffaele have a second chance. Meredith never will. I remember Meredith's parents saying they hoped the trial went quickly. They didn't want Meredith to be remembered as a victim of a horrible crime. They wanted her to be remembered as the beautiful spirited girl that she was. Unfortunately justice moves very slowly in Italy. Hopefully when this entire ordeal comes to a close, the Kercher family will finally be able to find the peace and closure that they are entitled to.
 
Bruce Fisher said:
It should be assumed from everything that I have said about the Kercher family that I do not approve of Supernaut's comments.

Such a shame then that Kermit had to prod and poke you to say something. Anyone might think you were merely paying lip service.
 
It should be assumed from everything that I have said about the Kercher family that I do not approve of Supernaut's comments ....

The Kercher family deserves privacy and respect. They lost Meredith forever. As we fight on to correct the injustice that has been committed against Amanda and Raffaele, we need to be mindful, that Amanda and Raffaele have a second chance. Meredith never will. I remember Meredith's parents saying they hoped the trial went quickly. They didn't want Meredith to be remembered as a victim of a horrible crime.
.
Well, I almost let out a grunt of recognition for you, Bruce, until I saw you mixing in the classic FOA line: "at least Amanda has a second chance".

Meredith got brutally murdered.

Amanda has been convicted of her murder.

Whatever your view on her guilt, Amanda will be walking the streets in x years, will be able to love, breathe, climb mountains, be with her family (she alreadys sees them a couple of times a week, and talks once a week with family back in Seattle).

As a suggestion, why don't you take out that slippery reference to Amanda and Raffaele, and just leave the tipping of your hat ONLY dedicated to the Kerchers and not to two of the three persons who have been convicted of Meredith's murder.
 
And actually, all those I've spoken to who 'have' read Barbie's book have said that Barbie treats Meredith with great dignity and compassion and her book is not sensational at all.

Have you read the book? I have. I will not repeat Barbie's comments about Meredith because they are disgusting.

If you defend what Barbie wrote, it simply shows where you stand on this matter.
 
.
Well, I almost let out a grunt of recognition for you, Bruce, until I saw you mixing in the classic FOA line: "at least Amanda has a second chance".

Meredith got brutally murdered.

Amanda has been convicted of her murder.

Whatever your view on her guilt, Amanda will be walking the streets in x years, will be able to love, breathe, climb mountains, be with her family (she alreadys sees them a couple of times a week, and talks once a week with family back in Seattle).

As a suggestion, why don't you take out that slippery reference to Amanda and Raffaele, and just leave the tipping of your hat ONLY dedicated to the Kerchers and not to two of the three persons who have been convicted of Meredith's murder.

You and I disagree on a very important point. I believe that an injustice has occurred. I believe that Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito have been wrongly convicted.

My words are not disrespectful in any way to the Kercher family. Do not try to insinuate otherwise.
 
Defend her from what? Assertions? Because that's all you've given. What examples have you given of her being offensive to Meredith? None.

If you read Barbie's book, you know exactly what I am talking about. I will not repeat her comments here.
 
You and I disagree on a very important point. I believe that an injustice has occurred. I believe that Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito have been wrongly convicted.

My words are not disrespectful in any way to the Kercher family.
Do not try to insinuate otherwise.
And so you equate the Kercher's loss of Meredith with the imprisonment of Amanda and Raffaele.

Could you use your good offices with your secret sources, who I assume are VERY close to the Knox-Mellas families, to reverse a family decision that Amanda shouldn't lament to the Kerchers the loss of Meredith until Amanda is out of prison?

Although I guess it's kind of late, but better late than never.
 
Gods below, can we please get back to discussing the details of the case instead of "member k of team y is morally corrupt"? It's really getting on my nerves and does not advance the discussion of the details of the case. If you feel any comment is out of bounds please report it to the moderators of the JREF board via the exclamation mark symbol on the left instead of lambasting the opposition. The team of the JREF forum is good at their job. That goes for all sides of this argument (and I believe there are more than two, despite the misgivings some people seem to have.).

I think it was waltzed over in the drama that seems to hit this thread the last few pages so I will repeat myself, little diva that I am, and ask again: How would we be able to distinguish between DNA transferred via the bloody towels and DNA transferred via direct contact between Raffaele and the clasp? Unless I am missing something (and that may well be, given that I am no expert) there is no way the forensics team can retroactively prevent a transfer from occuring.
And that leads to the conundrum of "there may be a possibility of contamination, what shall be done with the results?"
I admit that I am more of the opinion that the possibility alone without further evidence that shows that contamination happened is liable to get ANY DNA evidence thrown out. Because contamination is almost always a possibility.
Which leads to the next question: Do we have anything that may shed light on whether the towels and the clasp have come into contact? For example fibers?
 
I wonder why Barbie Latza Nadeau still sits high up on a pedestal with the PMF crowd. Her book is extremely disrespectful to Meredith Kercher. She mentions personal details about Meredith that have absolutely no bearing on the case. She does this simply to make money. Barbie should be ashamed of her actions. The title of her book is illustrated to look as if it is written in Meredith's blood.

Stop trying to smear anyone who believes that an injustice has occurred. Maybe you should be looking more closely at one of your preferred sources.

It should be assumed from everything that I have said about the Kercher family that I do not approve of Supernaut's comments.

trying to highlight one person's comment to discredit everyone that disagrees with you is nonsense. That in itself borders on being disrespectful to Meredith's family. Stop using the Kercher's to try and discredit anyone that believes that an injustice has occurred.

Here are statements from my website that I have made in regard to this matter.

Many people that are currently following this case never had the opportunity to meet Meredith Kercher. We have all learned from her family and friends just how special Meredith was. No matter what conclusions you draw from this case, one thing is certain, Meredith's family, her friends and the world, lost a beautiful young woman, to a senseless act of inhumanity.

The Kercher family deserves privacy and respect. They lost Meredith forever. As we fight on to correct the injustice that has been committed against Amanda and Raffaele, we need to be mindful, that Amanda and Raffaele have a second chance. Meredith never will. I remember Meredith's parents saying they hoped the trial went quickly. They didn't want Meredith to be remembered as a victim of a horrible crime. They wanted her to be remembered as the beautiful spirited girl that she was. Unfortunately justice moves very slowly in Italy. Hopefully when this entire ordeal comes to a close, the Kercher family will finally be able to find the peace and closure that they are entitled to.

Bruce,

I would have believed you if you hadn't posted just a few post earlier on Barbie's book and how it's supposedly disrespectful too. And in particular, asking us to condemn Barbie also.

That tells me you are just paying lip service to the family and friends of Meredith. But clearly you don't give a jot about Meredith, her family and her friends. Instead of telling Supernaut that he's out of line, you're first reaction is 'But look, Barbie does it too'. That tells me everything i need to know about where your priorities lie.

Amazer
 
You're welcome to try your hand at creating a narrative. Only one other person has tried, so far, and it was rapidly abandoned in favour of more unsubstantiated speculation.

I abandoned that thread because you were not interested in exploring the possibility but only in throwing more rocks at Amanda and Raffaele.

Your repeated call for "Pick one scenario " shows just how despicable your intentions are. Do you really think that by finding a flaw in one Lone Wolf Scenario you will defeat the Lone Wolf theory? If you were a skeptic, you would accept the challenge to develop a viable alternate theory and not try to dismiss them by throwing in strawmen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom