• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Israeli extremists to burn Obama in effigy

Is it even possible to be the president and NOT be burned in effigy by someone?

I think it should be possible. This can be achieved by trying to do nothing when in office. You will be considered a bad president, and everyone will dislike you. However, no one will hate you.
 
I think it should be possible. This can be achieved by trying to do nothing when in office. You will be considered a bad president, and everyone will dislike you. However, no one will hate you.

And there can't be any ongoing conflicts that the country is involved with.

And you can't be a Republican. And probably not black. And you have to be vaguely religious without really being religious enough to piss off any other religious groups.
 
And there can't be any ongoing conflicts that the country is involved with.

And you can't be a Republican. And probably not black. And you have to be vaguely religious without really being religious enough to piss off any other religious groups.

Reasonable objections. Still, it should be possible. Not easy, but possible.
 
Burning an effigy is not a call for assassination.

Indeed not. It's a time-honored method of political protest. And what's more, the funny thing is, the OP didn't even protest them actually doing it, merely that they plan to.

If this goes on, we shall soon see OPs like "Man somewhere in the zionist entity had a passing thought about possibly burning Obama in effigy."
 
I think it should be possible. This can be achieved by trying to do nothing when in office. You will be considered a bad president, and everyone will dislike you. However, no one will hate you.

Doing nothing IS doing something.

For example, you wouldn't be ending policies that piss people off. Also, by not vetoing bills as they come to you, you be acting as an arm of Congress.
 
And there can't be any ongoing conflicts that the country is involved with.

And you can't be a Republican. And probably not black. And you have to be vaguely religious without really being religious enough to piss off any other religious groups.

There is another way - suffer a fatal heart attack on the day of inauguration, but after you were sworn in. That's about it, though.

Parky (aka Thunder), I'm still waiting for either links to your protests to those or similar events, or a through explanation why is this case different. It's not like you weren't here you know :)

McHrozni
 
Doing nothing IS doing something.

For example, you wouldn't be ending policies that piss people off. Also, by not vetoing bills as they come to you, you be acting as an arm of Congress.

Do not take me too literally. By doing nothing I meant avoiding plans which are controversial, not avoiding taking any steps. Eventually, you will piss everybody off, but to a lesser extent.
 
Dear god...

"The spread of Islam was military. There is a tendency to
apologize for this and we should not. It is one of the
injunctions of the Qur'an that you must fight to spread Islam."
-- Dr. Ali Issa Othman, Islamic Scholar


"Dear god"
-- "Readtail"
 
OMG! I'm So sorry! I had no idea I was asking you to back up your claims! How dare I ask for evidence an not take you at your word!?!?!

I did back up my claims. In school, when asked to read the whole instruction before taking the test, did you fail that assignment? If you read my whole post instead of taking me out of context AGAIN you would see I posted that video of Obama in Ciro where he said exactly what I said he said. Since I gave you what your asked for, your rantings on a sentence by sentence basis makes you look... I don't know... like you have a short attention span
 
Parky (aka Thunder), I'm still waiting for either links to your protests to those or similar events, or a through explanation why is this case different. It's not like you weren't here you know :)

McHrozni
New user name, same avoidance of topics that he himself starts?
 
I did back up my claims.
Repeating that everything Obama said was not true is not backing up your claims.

In school, when asked to read the whole instruction before taking the test, did you fail that assignment?
Nope. That's one of the reasons I'm a college professor when I'm not acting now.

If you read my whole post instead of taking me out of context AGAIN you would see I posted that video of Obama in Ciro where he said exactly what I said he said.
You didn't say what you said he said. You said what he said was not true and never backed up what you said.

BTW: I'm not taking you out of context.


Since I gave you what your asked for, your rantings on a sentence by sentence basis makes you look... I don't know... like you have a short attention span
Try to focus here Bill.
Too bad everything he said was not true.
YOU brought it up. YOU back it up. Not by posting a video and saying that proves it. Show how everything he said was not true.
 
Last edited:
"The spread of Islam was military. There is a tendency to
apologize for this and we should not. It is one of the
injunctions of the Qur'an that you must fight to spread Islam."
-- Dr. Ali Issa Othman, Islamic Scholar


"Dear god"
-- "Readtail"

Anyway, it is not like Obama is a real president anyway.
-Bill Thompson

Barack Obama, 44th President of the United States
-America

Ok, we've played the quote game. Are you going to back up your claims by pointing out how everything He said about Islam was not true or are you going to keep running?
 
Last edited:
anyone in the USA who burned Bush in effigy, should have been questioned by the Secret Service.

any foreign nation that allows their people to burn our President in effigy, is not a true friend of the USA.

i pray the Israeli police arrest any such folks promptly. i would expect the same thing from Britain, France, Germany, Ireland, Canada, etc..
So you are agaiinst free speech and political opposition.

Joe Stalin was your kind of guy, he tolerated no dissent.
 
So you are agaiinst free speech and political opposition.

I personally consider burning or hanging someone in effigy to be a violent threat. But if the SCOTUS disagrees with me, that is fine.

I bet, that if I posted a cartoon of a man labeled "Wildcat", being burned in effigy, you would report it as a personal attack.
 
Parky (aka Thunder), I'm still waiting for either links to your protests to those or similar events, or a through explanation why is this case different. It's not like you weren't here you know :)

i honestly was not familiar with Bush being burned in effigy in the USA, or in some friendly country. but if it did happen, and the police did not stop it right away, I retro-actively condemn those actions.

happy now? thought not. not that I really care.
 
I personally consider burning or hanging someone in effigy to be a violent threat. But if the SCOTUS disagrees with me, that is fine.
I don't need the SCOTUS to tell me that isn't a threat.

I bet, that if I posted a cartoon of a man labeled "Wildcat", being burned in effigy, you would report it as a personal attack.
You would lose that bet. In fact, I have never reported anyone for anything here. I value free speech, much more than this forum's admins and you do.
 
I don't need the SCOTUS to tell me that isn't a threat.

well, since the the Supreme Court has the final say on such issues, you kinda do.

as to freedom of speech, do you think its wrong for it to be illegal to display the Swastika in Germany and Austria, and for Holocaust denial to be a felony?

I'm just wondering how consistent you are, in terms of your supposed commitment to free speech.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom