Amanda Knox guilty - all because of a cartwheel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bruce Fisher said:
I am happy to hear that you read Mark's newest article. It is very good. More to come on that.
Click to expand...

Since you think the article is very good, do you agree with his conclusion that:

Rudy worked for the Perugian justice authorities. He murdered Meredith Kercher while under their employ and protection.
Click to expand...

Even if you don't want to reveal your sources, are you saying there is evidence to back up this claim?
 
Bruce Fisher said:
If evidence is provided that clears Rudy Guede I will accept that. Please read the definition of the word guilter. Please do not use my word out of context. I am glad to see that you like it though.
Click to expand...

You sound proud. Post it up here so we can all analyse it. Personally, I'd rather not give you or your dump of a site the clicks. So, post it here, don't be shy.
 
Bruce Fisher said:
Actually it does. I explained how Rudy would have pushed glass toward the room. Glass coming back at the source is simply speculation.
Click to expand...

Right, let me get this straight...a rock busting into the window from outside would have knocked no glass fragments to the ground. Someone climbing up over the sill would have knocked no glass to the ground. Have I got it right? What? Do you honestly think this has legs? Are you smart or not? Or, do you just figure nobody else is?

Try selling your bridge elsewhere.
 
Mr. Waterbury really seems to make a jump before he has a leg to stand on. The article by Graham tells absolutely nothing. Not sure if it is interesting that the Express has not allowed comments on this story.
 
The way I see it there are three scenarios to explain the break in. Each have hard to explain its that don't allow me a complete understanding of what actually happened.

First scenario, the window was broken from the outside. The inside wooden blind of Filomena's window clearly shows damage and embedded glass and the glass scattered across the room onto the blue mat is consistent with a trajectory of the rock being thrown from outside in through the closed window. BUT the exterior wood shutters were closed according to testimony, making this theory next to impossible not to mention the lack of glass or trampled grass outside on the ground beneath.

Second scenario, the window was broken from the inside in its closed position. If the window was broken from the inside, how was it done? The glass on the sill could be consistent with holding the rock and breaking the window with the window closed and the outside shutter closed. If the rock were it is heavy enough to possibly knock the outside shutter open and cause glass to fall tpo the ground. BUT, if this happened how did the interior wood blind become damaged and embedded with glass and how did the glass get across the room onto the blue mat?

Third scenario, the window was broken from the inside while held open. If the window was held open with its wooden blind closed this would explain the damage to the blind BUT the broken glass would more likely have ended up on the clothes beneath the wardrobe rather than on the blue mat. Also in this scenario how did the glass end up on both sides of the window sill?

I know people here have considered all possibilities. I've read all the posts but have yet to be able to say for sure what I believe happened. Is there a complete explanation for the scattered glass, the damaged blind, the closed outside shutters as well as the final resting place of the rock?
 
Danceme said:
I know people here have considered all possibilities. I've read all the posts but have yet to be able to say for sure what I believe happened. Is there a complete explanation for the scattered glass, the damaged blind, the closed outside shutters as well as the final resting place of the rock?
Click to expand...

Yes...Filomena. She shook glass everywhere.
 
Bruce Fisher said:
Is Raffaele's forensic expert FOA?.
Click to expand...
Are you saying that I stated that, or are you truly asking?

Bruce Fisher said:
You took the small sample from the larger picture.
Click to expand...
Well, I took "perfect match" (according to you) number 5.

Bruce Fisher said:
You have really made a fool out of yourself with this post.
Click to expand...
I'm not the one who said that that was a "perfect match"

Bruce Fisher said:
The prosecution agrees that these prints belong to Rudy.
Click to expand...
Quote? Citation?

Bruce Fisher said:
No one has ever claimed that Raffaele's print was anywhere on the pillow. Are you making that claim?
Click to expand...
No. My image simply showed that what you call a "perfect match" is anything but that.

Bruce Fisher said:
You turned the small sample around to "almost" match an area on another shoe. Did you forget that the small sample was taken from a larger image showing more of the print matching Rudy's Nike's?
Click to expand...
That may be the case, but the person who "isolated" the small sample, separating from the larger stain, is not myself, but Francesco Vinci.

Bruce Fisher said:
You are simply doing this to try and discredit me.
Click to expand...
You discredit yourself. Other Entourage types who suggest things like Meredith and Amanda sharing bras also discredit your campaign.
 
Kermit said:
Are you saying that I stated that, or are you truly asking?


Well, I took "perfect match" (according to you) number 5.


I'm not the one who said that that was a "perfect match"


Quote? Citation?


No. My image simply showed that what you call a "perfect match" is anything but that.


That may be the case, but the person who "isolated" the small sample, separating from the larger stain, is not myself, but Francesco Vinci.


You discredit yourself. Other Entourage types who suggest things like Meredith and Amanda sharing bras also discredit your campaign.
Click to expand...

You have done nothing to explain your laughable shoe print example.

When have I ever said anything about sharing bras?

You are clearly frustrated and now you are assuming that I have spoken about sharing bras? I am aware that you say "Other Entourage types" but you are clearly trying to link the statement to me.
 
Last edited:
Bruce Fisher said:
When have I ever said anything about sharing bras?
Click to expand...

You didn't, but others, including Rafaelle's father, have stated that the reason his DNA was found on the bra clasp was fact that the two girls were such great friends that they swapped bras.
 
Fulcanelli said:
Right, let me get this straight...a rock busting into the window from outside would have knocked no glass fragments to the ground. Someone climbing up over the sill would have knocked no glass to the ground. Have I got it right? What? Do you honestly think this has legs? Are you smart or not? Or, do you just figure nobody else is?

Try selling your bridge elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Your sarcasm doesn't make you stronger. Show me the photos of the ground. Small fragments could have very well ended up outside. We aren't talking about that much glass. Only a portion of the window is missing.
 
Alt+F4 said:
You didn't, but others, including Rafaelle's father, have stated that the reason his DNA was found on the bra clasp was fact that the two girls were such great friends that they swapped bras.
Click to expand...

What does this have to do with me? Why was it brought up in a shoe print discussion? Desperation? Frustration?
 
Bruce Fisher said:
What does this have to do with me? Why was it brought up in a shoe print discussion? Desperation? Frustration?
Click to expand...

Why did Kermit bring up the "red rabbit" in a shoe print discussion?

These are the people you believe? Take a step back and take another look.
 
Danceme said:
First scenario, the window was broken from the outside. The inside wooden blind of Filomena's window clearly shows damage and embedded glass and the glass scattered across the room onto the blue mat is consistent with a trajectory of the rock being thrown from outside in through the closed window. BUT the exterior wood shutters were closed according to testimony, making this theory next to impossible not to mention the lack of glass or trampled grass outside on the ground beneath.
Click to expand...

In the Micheli report, Filomena said she thought she had closed the shutters, but was not 100% true. She may have said she was certain at the trial. Do you really believe that memories become more accurate over time?

Even if she had closed the shutters, they were warped and did not shut properly. They could not be latched and it would have been a simple matter to open them. Either by climbing or by reaching up with a stick. That they didn't close properly was clearly visible. It's the kind of thing a burglar would notice when picking a house for his next job.

I would expect a burglar climbing in via a broken window to close the shutters. Being seen inside a house where you don't belong is likely to shorten your career as a burglar.

BTW - Welcome to JREF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom