• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Freedom of speech?

not only against non-moslems.
every callup for violence should be punished.

but that was/is not the case here.

The imam was calling out non-Muslims only.
Islam calls for violence against non-Muslims only.
 
The imam was calling out non-Muslims only.
Islam calls for violence against non-Muslims only.

he said nonbelivers. not non-muslims.

and its not about what Islam is calling up to, according to you. it is about what the imam said, he may be in a gray zone, but i dont see him calling for violence.
 
he said nonbelivers. not non-muslims.

Same thing. D'oh.

and its not about what Islam is calling up to, according to you. it is about what the imam said, he may be in a gray zone, but i dont see him calling for violence.

imams tend to base their teachings on the Koran, being Muslims. D'oh.
 
ok, you would jail him. i dont.

can we agree to disagree with eachother?

I would give the imam a polite warning against using inflammatory language designed to incite violence against non-Muslims by radical Muslims. If he continued, I'd arrest him.
 
I would give the imam a polite warning against using inflammatory language designed to incite violence against non-Muslims by radical Muslims. If he continued, I'd arrest him.

mmh i think a warning is ok.
 
Hey, I'm just paraphrasing what the Euros on this board have been saying in defense of their thought crime laws. I don't think they were being sarcastic.

Either your reading comprehension skills are crappier than crappy, or you are deliberately trolling. Which one is it?
 
That explains why all the Moslems in the world are immune to attacks by fundamentalist Moslems. I was wondering about that.

Only *true* Muslims are immune to attacks by Muslim extremists. But, those Muslims who assimmilate into Western society and abandon the ways of Islam by associating with the infidel are guilty of apostasy and relinquish all such protection. Any Muslims killed on 9/11, for example, were justified, based on this reasoning.
 
Only *true* Muslims are immune to attacks by Muslim extremists. But, those Muslims who assimmilate into Western society and abandon the ways of Islam by associating with the infidel are guilty of apostasy and relinquish all such protection. Any Muslims killed on 9/11, for example, were justified, based on this reasoning.

Now you're going beyond embroidery and knitting an entire wardrobe. If I send you a few skeins of wool, will you knit me a cableknit sweater while you're at it?
 
Now you're going beyond embroidery and knitting an entire wardrobe. If I send you a few skeins of wool, will you knit me a cableknit sweater while you're at it?

Fail.

9/11 Shura Council, Guantanamo Bay--
We, Muslims, are content with God's book, the Quran, to fight you with. God has granted us to fight... In God's book, He ordered us to fight you everywhere we find you... We ask to be near to God, we fight you and destroy you and terrorize you. The Jihad in God's cause is a great duty in our religion.
 
Last edited:
Either your reading comprehension skills are crappier than crappy, or you are deliberately trolling. Which one is it?
My comprehension skills are just fine. I've been told over and over on this forum how hate speech must continue to be banned because riots, chaos, anarchy, and/or fascism would surely follow if it wasn't. Isn't that why Holocaust denial is illegal in Germany?
 
Fail.

9/11 Shura Council, Guantanamo Bay--

Where does that statemen, from one individual, show that the True Believers will be immune to fundie terrorist attacks and that other, e.g. assimilated Muslims are fair game?

You're not very good at this, are you? Just making up crap and attributing to others so you can score refutation points is known as the strawman fallacy, I believe.

Wanna try again? Or are you happy with the horrible job you've done so far.
 

Back
Top Bottom