JohnG
Pedantic Bore
And if that was the actual seating alignment of the 1961 Lincoln Continental limousine in question, you might have a point. Since it isn't, you don't.
Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...
- Thread starter roundhead
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jfk assassination
And if that was the actual seating alignment of the 1961 Lincoln Continental limousine in question, you might have a point. Since it isn't, you don't.
Oswald's view...right to left impossible
Groden's pic apparently depicts both impossible angles by the government but the headshot is paramount and it's not possible from the right to left angle from the sixth floor.
The left to right angle is theoretically possible but is the opposite angle from the 6th floor. THEY LIED.
Groden's pic apparently depicts both impossible angles by the government but the headshot is paramount and it's not possible from the right to left angle from the sixth floor.
The left to right angle is theoretically possible but is the opposite angle from the 6th floor. THEY LIED.
Last edited:
Grassy knoll impossible
The biggest and most effective lie ever told is the right fence angle which could not and DID NOT cause the exit wound on the right rear portion of Kennedy's skull. They lied and knew they were lying. Oliver Stone and Robert Groden are the biggest and most effective disinfo agents in this case, by far. The irony in this case is legendary and beyond bizarre.
Ollie didn't tell you the right angle is not a possible location and the exit wound required a shot from the front. HE FOOLED MILLIONS. Specter sends him Christmas cards for sure. Hollywood did the government's work by pushing an obvious LIE.
THE DRIVER HAD THE ONLY ANGLE CONSISTENT WITH THE RIGHT REAR EXIT.
The biggest and most effective lie ever told is the right fence angle which could not and DID NOT cause the exit wound on the right rear portion of Kennedy's skull. They lied and knew they were lying. Oliver Stone and Robert Groden are the biggest and most effective disinfo agents in this case, by far. The irony in this case is legendary and beyond bizarre.
Ollie didn't tell you the right angle is not a possible location and the exit wound required a shot from the front. HE FOOLED MILLIONS. Specter sends him Christmas cards for sure. Hollywood did the government's work by pushing an obvious LIE.
THE DRIVER HAD THE ONLY ANGLE CONSISTENT WITH THE RIGHT REAR EXIT.
Last edited:
CurtC
Illuminator
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Tell her I like her floor.
Regnad Kcin
Penultimate Amazing
Yes, yes, let us wily conspirators direct the driver of the limo, in plain sight of:
Not arrange that he "trip" down a flight of White House stairs, "overdose" on one of the numerous drugs he took daily, or perhaps "choke" on a pretzel while relaxing in front of the television.
Why that would be crazy.
- every person in the car
- the Secret Service agents around the car
- those following the car directly behind
- dozens of witnesses lining both sides of the unsecured, wide-open public space (many of whom it will be assumed are taking photographs)
Not arrange that he "trip" down a flight of White House stairs, "overdose" on one of the numerous drugs he took daily, or perhaps "choke" on a pretzel while relaxing in front of the television.
Why that would be crazy.
Last edited:
The small side of the hole would be the entrance. The larger sized holw would be the exit. There is an interview out there on YouTube of the Ford employee who was placed in charge of replacing the glass. He said the front of the windshield was the entrance hole. He had apparently replaced other windshields with bullet holes, so he recognized the direction as soon as he saw it.
The bullet hole in windshield and sniper location revealed
The south grassy knoll is the sniper location for Kennedy's throat wound.
This pic was taken by Altgens at frame 255 which shows the hole right of the mirror. Notice the darkness in the middle indicating a hole.
This pic was was taken by Altgens at frame 347 from the rear of the limo and shows the exact same defect/hole he captured 5 seconds before. The shape, size, and distance from the mirror make it the same defect. Notice the frothing defect below the mirror is taken out of this pic.
The south grassy knoll is the sniper location for Kennedy's throat wound.
This pic was taken by Altgens at frame 255 which shows the hole right of the mirror. Notice the darkness in the middle indicating a hole.
This pic was was taken by Altgens at frame 347 from the rear of the limo and shows the exact same defect/hole he captured 5 seconds before. The shape, size, and distance from the mirror make it the same defect. Notice the frothing defect below the mirror is taken out of this pic.
I Ratant
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2008
- Messages
- 19,258
When is this ***** gonna be slapped down for posting the -same- images time after time after time?
When is this ***** gonna learn to use screen-print, and not his cell phone to get digital images?
When is this ***** gonna go to the McAdams site and actually see what's there?
JFK Twinkies and 911Twinkies seem to have the difficulty with cognitive dissonance.
No cognitive ability, and lots of dissonance in confronting reality.
When is this ***** gonna learn to use screen-print, and not his cell phone to get digital images?
When is this ***** gonna go to the McAdams site and actually see what's there?
JFK Twinkies and 911Twinkies seem to have the difficulty with cognitive dissonance.
No cognitive ability, and lots of dissonance in confronting reality.
If the pic at Parkland was NOT photographically altered then the defect/hole left of mirror would be visible. It's not, therefore the pic was altered.
Altgens pic at 347 shows a visible defect consistent with his first pic taken at frame 255. Any juror in this world would go with and believe Altgens pics to be true over the government's no crack and small crack pics both of which are inconsistent with Altgens historic images.
Altgens pic at 347 shows a visible defect consistent with his first pic taken at frame 255. Any juror in this world would go with and believe Altgens pics to be true over the government's no crack and small crack pics both of which are inconsistent with Altgens historic images.
Last edited:
With any cover-up, glaring inconsistencies are everywhere that cannot be explained away or challenged by those unwilling to accept the harsh reality that the official story is complete and utter nonsense and would never hold up in any court in this world. As we can see here, the bullet hole is just right of the mirror only 30 frames after Kennedy's hit in the throat. The government's crack is clearly further right of the bullet hole and only a small crack. This proves there was a cover-up all by itself.
JohnG
Pedantic Bore
7forever, NO ONE here is taking anything you post here seriously. You stubbornly ignore sincere advice on how to make your posts more presentable and you refuse to engage in meaningful debate when others here provide evidence that flies in the face of your pet theories. You are coming off as a cluelessly arrogant child or a mentally unbalanced adult with an idée fixe.
I understand the seductive power of the JFK CTs as well as anybody. JFK was practically a patron saint in my house when I was a kid. We had busts of him and RFK in the living room. Hell, I was named after JFK and as a very young child assumed that I must be related to him for all the attention his memory was given by my family. I, too bought into all 31 flavors of the JFK conspiracy theories as a teenager for the simple reason that a troubled nobody who wanted to shoot his way into the history books wasn't a worthy and satisfying nemesis (in dramatic terms) for who I considered one of the greatest Presidents in history.
These counter theories have no real evidence to support them and to say that they make no sense is putting it mildly. You believe the conspirators went to all the trouble of painting Oswald as the lone patsy but they have the coup de grâce delivered by the limo driver in full view of dozens of witnesses armed with cameras??? That isn't a theory that's a fever dream.
I understand the seductive power of the JFK CTs as well as anybody. JFK was practically a patron saint in my house when I was a kid. We had busts of him and RFK in the living room. Hell, I was named after JFK and as a very young child assumed that I must be related to him for all the attention his memory was given by my family. I, too bought into all 31 flavors of the JFK conspiracy theories as a teenager for the simple reason that a troubled nobody who wanted to shoot his way into the history books wasn't a worthy and satisfying nemesis (in dramatic terms) for who I considered one of the greatest Presidents in history.
These counter theories have no real evidence to support them and to say that they make no sense is putting it mildly. You believe the conspirators went to all the trouble of painting Oswald as the lone patsy but they have the coup de grâce delivered by the limo driver in full view of dozens of witnesses armed with cameras??? That isn't a theory that's a fever dream.
Last edited:
I could NOT care less whether you take it seriously or not. That's not the point of anything except the fact that you think you even matter in the slightest. I have proven beyond any real doubt that Kennedy was shot from the front twice at the exclusion of the north grassy knoll and that is real progress in this old case.
TSR
Illuminator
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2009
- Messages
- 4,783
.
Ummmm. No you have not, and no, it is not.
But let's run with this: what *is* the point of your claims here. What do you want to happen?
Because right now, all that is happening is pointing and laughing
.
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
CurtC
Illuminator
You wouldn't happen to have a link to this?
We'd also need to know why his opinion would override the opinion of the ballistics expert who examined the crack in the windshield and found the opposite direction, including specks of lead still stuck to the inside surface of the windshield.
JohnG
Pedantic Bore
I understand you believe in your theory in the same way that as a young man (with a similar clueless arrogance) I thought I had devised a "Theory of Everything" that not only reconciled quantum mechanics with general relativity but also easily explained the creation of the universe from seeming nothingness. The theory was (to paraphrase Samuel Johnson) both good and original. Unfortunately the good parts weren't very original and the original parts weren't very good. Similarly, you bring nothing new or compelling (as far as I can see) to the table in terms of evidence or theories on the JFK assassination. It's all been brought up here and debunked a hundred times before. You seem to believe that a picture speaks a thousand words, but unfortunately most of your pictures are blurry to the point of incoherence.
Since you are unwilling or unable to address my questions I'll put them to any lurking fence sitters out there to ponder:
Why should we respect the purported image analysis expertise of someone who doesn't even know how to take a screenshot?
Why would the conspirators attempt to pin the blame on a lone nut with a rifle in the schoolbook depository by having the limo driver shoot the president point blank with a hand gun in front of dozens of witnesses armed with cameras?
Doesn't the actual seating alignment of the limo in question (see the link in post 601) utterly disprove the so called "magic bullet"?
JimBenArm
Based on a true story!
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Messages
- 13,092
The only thing you've proven is that your particular form of brain damage cannot be caught by viewing grainy, out-of-focus images on an internet forum. Thank goodness!
Other than that, you've presented nothing that a person with a working brain stem could take seriously. I mean, really. You can't hear that? That's us pointing and laughing at you.
You think you have some special investigative powers? And you say WE don't matter in the slightest? Sorry. You have this exactly backwards. You matter not one whit in the course of history. No one is listening to your arguments except for the humor contained within. In two years time, we won't even remember who you were, other than a vague "remember that loon that posted the pictures he took with his cell phone because he was too stupid to figure out how to do screen captures, and then posted them here like he had just discovered sex?" kind of posts. Yeah.
Here's how you can discover the impact you make here.
1) find a bucket of water
2) stick your hand in
3) pull your hand out
4) measure the hole you left in the water
That hole? It's twice as big as the impression you make here.
Really. Go find another hobby. You suck at this one.
Nobody has debunked me, you silly. I used the killer's own testimony to show the correct wound path and that is something new. I used Altgens two pics which depict a bullet hole that it totally inconsistent with the government's pics. The Altgens pics were taken right after the first shots came into the limo and right after the driver fired the fatal shot and the dummie shot from the north knoll. The truth destroys everything in its path and that is exactly what's been done here. No challenge from any person on here and there never will be. Ridiculing me or the evidence proves you have no challenge and in the real world you would be totally screwed because you would have to deal with it just like Casey Anthony's pathetic defense will face before she's fried.
Greer fired the fatal shot and the throat wound came from the south grassy knoll which is something I learned from others who've investigated this case. Connally was shot from the rear between 234-238 and those three bullet wounds would be believed by any neutral panel or jury in this world, with ease. And, in that delivery of common sense every known theory would be debunked which is something I've done quite well by showing simple angles.
Greer fired the fatal shot and the throat wound came from the south grassy knoll which is something I learned from others who've investigated this case. Connally was shot from the rear between 234-238 and those three bullet wounds would be believed by any neutral panel or jury in this world, with ease. And, in that delivery of common sense every known theory would be debunked which is something I've done quite well by showing simple angles.