Former Rooski Nucular Intelligence Officer To Blow the Reveal Entire 911 Plot

911thology said:
You don't owe me anything and it is precisely vice versa. Don't like my ideas? Get lost. Don't want to watch my movies? Get lost. Don't like who I am? Get lost. I am not going to marry you anyway. I want me to get lost? I will oblige you and do so any time.
Click to expand...

Sir, it's not like you are demanding we convert to Hindusim or telling us to become vegetarians. You are accusing people of mass murder. You don't want to provide evidence? YOU get lost.
 
answer

tj15 said:
Why did the pulverization stop at the outer walls? It pulverized stuff inside the outer walls, but the outer walls did not get damaged?

I don't see where in part 16 you talk about the outer walls. Why didn't the nuclear blast break through the outer walls of the towers?
Click to expand...

This all explained in the movie (parts 7 up) in the most comrehensive, illustrative and otherwise understanable way. Can't explain here better. Watch the movie. Don't wan't to watch? Up to you. I don't care.
 
911thology said:
Not too many people were treated for acute radiation sickness - there numbers were about 400 to 500 hundred. However, several thousands were treated for chronic radiation sickness that become apparent after 1 to 3 years after working on ground zero due to slow cumulative effect.

The most serious cases were acute radiation sickness with exposure exceeding 300 Roentgens. Outcome - imminent death within first 10 days.

Devices were 150 kiloton. Delivery method - mini railway leading from underneath the WTC-7 underneath of the targeted Twin Tower in special tunnels. All explained in the movie.
Click to expand...

Ok thread over....this guy has not got a clue what he is talking about. I think it likely he is simply a troll as no could really be that dumb as to think a 150 kiloton blast under each tower is even remotely possible as a cause for the towers collapse. Thats 10 ten times the power of the bombs dropped on Japan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy
 
answer

twinstead said:
Sir, it's not like you are demanding we convert to Hindusim or telling us to become vegetarians. You are accusing people of mass murder. You don't want to provide evidence? YOU get lost.
Click to expand...

I am not accusing anyone in mass murder. I explain in purely technical terms why the steel Twin Towers were pulvezied. This is number one. What hit the Pentagon - number two. The rest is of very little importance. I am not a judge to accuse anyone. Neither I am a public prosecutor. You want me to get lost? I am quite near to it. Any more questions before I get finally lost?
 
911thology said:
This all explained in the movie (parts 7 up) in the most comrehensive, illustrative and otherwise understanable way. Can't explain here better. Watch the movie. Don't wan't to watch? Up to you. I don't care.
Click to expand...

I watched until about part 18 or so. Give me the exact part and time in that part where you discuss the outer walls of the towers.
 
911thology said:
Not too many people were treated for acute radiation sickness - there numbers were about 400 to 500 hundred. However, several thousands were treated for chronic radiation sickness that become apparent after 1 to 3 years after working on ground zero due to slow cumulative effect.

The most serious cases were acute radiation sickness with exposure exceeding 300 Roentgens. Outcome - imminent death within first 10 days.

Devices were 150 kiloton. Delivery method - mini railway leading from underneath the WTC-7 underneath of the targeted Twin Tower in special tunnels. All explained in the movie.
Click to expand...
This is pure nonsense. Zero radiations death after 911 due to the WTC falling due to impacts and fires.

You have zero knowledge about nuclear weapons, and even less about radiation sickness. Your job as an Intelligence Officer is very ironic as you post the biggest lies and delusion that exist about 911 save the beam weapon insanity.

150 kiloton device would kill over 100,000 people within seconds of detonation, your delusion is so stupid is why no one takes you seriously and your failed idea with not earn the Pulitzer Prize. 150 kiloton devices would damage the other devices and would render them useless.

The size of the hole would be massive; you failed to study nuclear weapons and made up one of the dumbest scenarios about 911. UBL is laughing at you.
 
911thology said:
I didn't quite understand your new question. Could you make it in a form suitable to undersand and to answer?
Click to expand...

You ignored my first questions. I was the first to respond to your post in this thread. In post #66 i asked you specific questions. You ignored them. I knew you would. Ridicule is all that is left.
 
911thology said:
You don't owe me anything and it is precisely vice versa. Don't like my ideas? Get lost. Don't want to watch my movies? Get lost. Don't like who I am? Get lost. I am not going to marry you anyway. I want me to get lost? I will oblige you and do so any time.
Click to expand...

Do you not understand that this is YOUR claim and therefore YOU must provide the evidence to support it? So far you have dissembled and prevaricated and have not directly answered one question that I can see. You claim we are wasting your precious time; does it not occur to you that perhaps we feel YOU are wasting OUR precious time by refusing to summarize your points in a coherent manner? By refusing to provide your sources? You have already (ostensibly at any rate) done the research; what can you lose by simply providing your sources without this constant bleating for us to "watch your movie" or "read your book"? Do you not understand that, in order for us to make the attempt to understand your theories, we need to see what you have seen? Watching your movie will only give me your skewed perspective on the matter; by providing me with your sources and references, however, I can perhaps check your statements and maybe, just possibly, come to realize that you have a point somewhere. If you cannot understand this, then I'm sorry, but your presence here is pretty useless. This is a place of open DEBATE, where everyone provides clear evidence to support their theories if they can lay their hands on it; this is not a forum where you state your case with no supporting evidence and we simply take you at your word. If that's a problem for you, perhaps you should leave; but I for one hope you provide your sources instead.
 
911thology said:
from the very beginning and within first three minutes.
Click to expand...

Looks to me like you talk about the nuke being off centered. You also say that nothing would happen when the crushing wave (or whatever you call it) hits the air.

My question: How does stuff inside the building get turned into dust while the outer walls have no visible damage or exit holes from the energy that is turning everything into dust on the inside of the towers?
 
Everyone watch the first 3 mins. of part 16... Am I missing something? Where does he explain the outer walls?
 
911thology said:
In a form of DVD with video files recorded on it. For the US - also my book in paper form printed out and as a file. No, I did not claim any receipt. I simply gave the stuff to the officials and that's it.
Click to expand...
Thank you, please provide the names and I will contact them to find out their response.
 
Dear listeners. I would like to close this discussion with the following 'optimistic' note:
1) I noticed that not even one of you was genuinely interested in the topic.
2) None of you bothered to watch my movie before asking anything.
3) All of you are preconceived with an embedded idea that I am a liar.
4) All of you have truly strange belief that I allegedly owe you something.
If you re-view my very first (big) post on this thread where I set my conditions you will notice that this discussion has gone not the way I wished it to go and none of the conditions of mine was honored. Therefore I would like to wish you all the best and quit this discussion. If anyone appears here later with genuine interest he is always welcome to find my e-mail on the Internet and send his personalized questions to me. Otherwise I could be contacted via YouTube ‘911thology’ channel. Best wishes. Dimitri.
 
personally for DavidJames

DavidJames said:
Thank you, please provide the names and I will contact them to find out their response.
Click to expand...

Pesonally for DavidJames: I already quit this discussion, but as a matter of curtecy I will send you names and contact details you ask - please contact me over my e-mail (available on my web site) and remind me who you are and what you want.

For the rest - good bue.
 
Mancman said:
A summary of the first half hour:

Aluminium can't penetrate steel

WTC steel was as thick as tank armour

Repeat of September Clues nonsense about nose out and fade to black on chopper 5 footage

Claims the flightpaths of UA175 contradict in different videos - ('proves' this by comparing a shot showing the last second of flight with the 'divebomber' shot showing the last 12 seconds)

Jet fuel can't melt steel

Edna Cintron couldn't have stood in the impact hole

South Tower shouldn't have collapsed first if it was hit second

Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'

Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5,and penetrated 6 walls of the building.



So, revolution starts now? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The 2.5 MACH missile is funny, the 757 at 540 mph has more kinetic energy. When the delusional ideas come out, they come out stupid.
If only the intel officer could do math and physics, or understand nukes.

His work is complete nonsense and offers zero evidence. His knowledge on nuclear weapons is nonexistent and proved by his own work.
 
911thology said:
Dear listeners. I would like to close this discussion with the following 'optimistic' note:
1) I noticed that not even one of you was genuinely interested in the topic.
2) None of you bothered to watch my movie before asking anything.
3) All of you are preconceived with an embedded idea that I am a liar.
4) All of you have truly strange belief that I allegedly owe you something.
If you re-view my very first (big) post on this thread where I set my conditions you will notice that this discussion has gone not the way I wished it to go and none of the conditions of mine was honored. Therefore I would like to wish you all the best and quit this discussion. If anyone appears here later with genuine interest he is always welcome to find my e-mail on the Internet and send his personalized questions to me. Otherwise I could be contacted via YouTube ‘911thology’ channel. Best wishes. Dimitri.
Click to expand...

Can I assume your next stop will be a law enforcement agency or respected news organization with your evidence? Or will you, when asked for evidence, direct THEM to your videos as well?
 
tj15 said:
Looks to me like you talk about the nuke being off centered. You also say that nothing would happen when the crushing wave (or whatever you call it) hits the air.

My question: How does stuff inside the building get turned into dust while the outer walls have no visible damage or exit holes from the energy that is turning everything into dust on the inside of the towers?
Click to expand...

you forget the "squibs" they look just like a venting nuclear bomb :D

And since there were survivors in both one of the towers and in the passage between the towers, how did two 150Ktonne bombs fail to kill or even irradiate them?:confused:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom