Former Rooski Nucular Intelligence Officer To Blow the Reveal Entire 911 Plot

ElMondoHummus said:
Has he got any unique arguments, or is he just spouting the standard truther canon?
Click to expand...

A summary of the first half hour:

Aluminium can't penetrate steel

WTC steel was as thick as tank armour

Repeat of September Clues nonsense about nose out and fade to black on chopper 5 footage

Claims the flightpaths of UA175 contradict in different videos - ('proves' this by comparing a shot showing the last second of flight with the 'divebomber' shot showing the last 12 seconds)

Jet fuel can't melt steel

Edna Cintron couldn't have stood in the impact hole

South Tower shouldn't have collapsed first if it was hit second

Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'

Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5,and penetrated 6 walls of the building.



So, revolution starts now? :rolleyes:
 
NutCracker said:
Is the stupidity hot enough to melt steel? That is the question.
Click to expand...

Normally, the stupid only has to be hot enough to weaken the steel, but in this case it's hot enough to create an uncontrolled fusion reaction.
 
Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'
Click to expand...


Yeah, attempting such maneuvers would result in a crash.

Oh wait...
 
twinstead said:
Normally, the stupid only has to be hot enough to weaken the steel, but in this case it's hot enough to create an uncontrolled fusion reaction.
Click to expand...

Sandia can sell it's Z-machine for scrap metal, then. The same goes for the NIF. ITER need not be completed. Just throw a Truther or 10 in a swimming pool. (But first check they can actually swim.)
 
Mancman said:
A summary of the first half hour:

Aluminium can't penetrate steel

WTC steel was as thick as tank armour

Repeat of September Clues nonsense about nose out and fade to black on chopper 5 footage

Claims the flightpaths of UA175 contradict in different videos - ('proves' this by comparing a shot showing the last second of flight with the 'divebomber' shot showing the last 12 seconds)

Jet fuel can't melt steel

Edna Cintron couldn't have stood in the impact hole

South Tower shouldn't have collapsed first if it was hit second

Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'

Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5,and penetrated 6 walls of the building.



So, revolution starts now? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It looks like he is pretty good at copying and pasting from various “truther” web sites… and charging for it.
Hey, maybe I could write a book.:)
 
Mancman said:
A summary of the first half hour:

Aluminium can't penetrate steel

WTC steel was as thick as tank armour

Repeat of September Clues nonsense about nose out and fade to black on chopper 5 footage

Claims the flightpaths of UA175 contradict in different videos - ('proves' this by comparing a shot showing the last second of flight with the 'divebomber' shot showing the last 12 seconds)

Jet fuel can't melt steel

Edna Cintron couldn't have stood in the impact hole

South Tower shouldn't have collapsed first if it was hit second

Hani Hanjour couldn't perform the necessary manouvres nor could 'the best pilot in the world'

Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5,and penetrated 6 walls of the building.



So, revolution starts now? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Oh. Standard conspiracy fantasy canon then. Got it.

Color me disappointed. Unsurprised, but disappointed. Just another run-of-the-mill truthing, nothing original.
 
Mancman said:
Pentagon was hit by a Soviet made granit missile launched from the Atlantic Ocean, it weighed over 7 tons and hit at mach 2.5, and penetrated 6 walls of the building.
Click to expand...



Actually, this HushaSonicBoom(tm) sounds new to me. Are there others who have made this assertion?
 
I am a former commissioned officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, so I understand quite well about nuclear explosions, their properties, effects
Click to expand...

try reading that with a "Checkov" voice.
 
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
 
Mancman said:
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
They allowed nuclear weapons in Manhattan??? Thats believable.
 
Mancman said:
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah. Built in demolitions. That one just came around again last month. And this very myth's been in circulation since at least 2006, when Christophera had to invent it to get around the "prep the buildings" issue (as a flashback, that's a link to the one and only "Realistice" thread... THE epic adventure in the JREF 9/11 CT subforum).

Funny how mere speculation on the part of some truthers suddenly becomes absolute knowledge for others to build on. :rolleyes:
 
Mancman said:
In part 4 he claims that the NYC building codes required the WTC to have an in-built demolition plan. The developers chose a nuclear device in the basement. Khalezov knew about this as early as 1984, and apparently this was mentioned in American newspapers.

The Sears Tower also has this feature. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No way dude, Chicago has been a "Nuclear Free Zone" since 1986.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom