Merged April Gallop / Gallop lawsuit thrown out / Appeal denied

FYI I registered at 911blogger because I wanted to add my two cents. Personally I don't see much substance to Ms. Gallop's claim, I'm curious to know how skeptical truthers are about it.
I know how you guys feel....

They're allowing me to post there, which is cool. The admin, Leftwright has been very professional, IMHO. I intend to return the favour.

http://911blogger.com/node/22940#comment-229246
 
Roflmao!

LashL said:
:whistling FTFY
Click to expand...

laughing-smiley-007.gif

123864ba125666d18d.jpg


Oh, you're mean. Cruel. I LOVE IT!!!! :D

Makes me want to sign up for PF911T's forum and use that as my avatar. :jaw-dropp
 
Last edited:
alienentity said:
FYI I registered at 911blogger because I wanted to add my two cents. Personally I don't see much substance to Ms. Gallop's claim, I'm curious to know how skeptical truthers are about it.
I know how you guys feel....

They're allowing me to post there, which is cool. The admin, Leftwright has been very professional, IMHO. I intend to return the favour.

http://911blogger.com/node/22940#comment-229246
Click to expand...

I'm impressed that he has not yet banned you, and that my IP ban has been lifted in the last few days. Perhaps glasnost has come to 9-11 Blogger?

BTW, I had to laugh at the commenter who blasted you for referring to body tissues and not "alleged" body tissues. These folks put out the wildest accusations with nary an "alleged" in sight.
 
ANd note this case was dismissed "With Prejudice". This is legalese for "Don't you dare to bother us with this BS lawsuit again".
 
Last edited:
ElMondoHummus said:
laughing-smiley-007.gif

123864ba125666d18d.jpg


Oh, you're mean. Cruel. I LOVE IT!!!! :D

Makes me want to sign up for PF911T's forum and use that as my avatar. :jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

Has anyone told Robert the Nut his ideas on 911 were judged, as the "Judge declares ... claims are factually baseless because they are fanciful, fantastic, and delusional." ?
 
So, any P4T or CIT response to this ruling on their 'evidence' yet?

Never mind, broke my own rule and looked for myself.

Alpo - "That's because her lawyers are idiots, if not something else entirely."

Craigie Poo - "Apparently the lawyers forgot to use the fact that the eyewitness evidence proves the plane did not hit".
Click to expand...

The delusion seems to be deeply rooted at the tree fort.

Capt'n Bob - "just got off the phone with Bill. He confirms it has been dismissed. I'm sure our detractors who spend their days and nights behind their computer screens obsessed with us are making fools of themselves in a giddy victory dance... But it's not over yet folks.. faaaar from it.."
Click to expand...

Same at P4T.

And in true ATS form...

warisover - "Well just because a district judge says "Gallop's claims are factually baseless, fanciful, fanatic, and delusional," does not make them so. In fact I think the judge should be dismissed from his throne and thrown in jail for aiding and abetting, not allowing due process and holding the American people hostage by letting the criminals in government get away with murder."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
BCR said:
So, any P4T or CIT response to this ruling on their 'evidence' yet?

Never mind, broke my own rule and looked for myself.



The delusion seems to be deeply rooted at the tree fort.



Same at P4T.
Click to expand...

Why am I not surprised? But then again, they've been immune to logic so far, so a mere court failure's not going to ignite any cognitive dissonance in that crew. Sad to say, but you nailed it, John: The delusion is deeply rooted. There's no changing their minds, there's only ensuring that proper refutations exist for their delusions.
 
BCR said:
And in true ATS form...
Click to expand...



warisover - "Well just because a district judge says "Gallop's claims are factually baseless, fanciful, fanatic, and delusional," does not make them so. In fact I think the judge should be dismissed from his throne and thrown in jail for aiding and abetting, not allowing due process and holding the American people hostage by letting the criminals in government get away with murder."
Click to expand...


Add yet another conspirator to that vast list.
 
BCR said:
So, any P4T or CIT response to this ruling on their 'evidence' yet?


Craig Ranke wrote "Apparently the lawyers forgot to use the fact that the eyewitness evidence proves the plane did not hit".


I wonder why not? Is it because a elementary school kid with access to google maps and a ruler could show that that simply was not true? Its almost a pity this didn't go to trial because I would have loved to see Ranke and Balsamo getting ripped to shreds (with predudice!)by the Defense and the Judge.
Click to expand...
 
"Well just because a district judge says "Gallop's claims are factually baseless, fanciful, fanatic, and delusional," does not make them so.
Click to expand...


Actually, from a standpoint of legal process, it does exactly that.

This particular finding isn't a matter of objective scientific truth. It's a legal judgment, made by (oddly enough) a judge.

I guess it's no surprise that people who specialize in spurious arguments from authority don't recognize a valid argument from authority when they see one.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom