Merged April Gallop / Gallop lawsuit thrown out / Appeal denied

Thanks, LashL. My favorite part:
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint on several grounds: Gallop has not sufficiently alleged constitutional violations; defendants are entitled to qualified immunity; the Anti-Terrorism Act claim fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; Gallop's claims are barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel; the constitutional claims are untimely; and the complaint is frivolous. I reach only the last prong of the motion: I agree that the complaint is frivolous. Hence, the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed, with prejudice.
Click to expand...

Is it legal for me to put up a copy of that PDF at my own web site?
 
"We allege that this was a wide-ranging enormous conspiracy" (Gallop's attorney, p. 6).

At least they were honest about the scale of the delusion. :rolleyes: So many CTers backpedal on this aspect of their "unofficial story" (if they ever bother to make one).
 
This info has made my day (as if any rational person expected anything different). I'm still laughing at the stupidity of it all.
 
Heh - and I like footnote 2 as well, where the judge notes that in a previous lawsuit, Gallop alleged that an airplane DID, in fact, hit the Pentagon, which is entirely inconsistent with her stupid allegations in this lawsuit.

(He didn't have to mention that at all since the complaint was being dismissed on other grounds, but I'm glad he did, particularly because I talked about that back when she filed this frivolous lawsuit. Had he not dismissed it on the basis of frivolity, it would have been interesting to see where he went with that.)
 
Last edited:
I was pretty depressed after reading the Texas school board's textbook hack job this morning. I've been in a bit of a pissed-off funk ever since.

...and then I saw this. :D
 
W.D.Clinger said:
Thanks, LashL. My favorite part:


Is it legal for me to put up a copy of that PDF at my own web site?
Click to expand...


Yes, it is. The document is a public document, and the copy has been bought and paid for (by me), so there are no legal constraints upon you republishing it at all.
 
I like that he referenced Wood's space laser lawsuit.
 
LashL said:
Heh - and I like footnote 2 as well, where the judge notes that in a previous lawsuit, Gallop alleged that an airplane DID, in fact, hit the Pentagon, which is entirely inconsistent with her stupid allegations in this lawsuit.

(He didn't have to mention that at all since the complaint was being dismissed on other grounds, but I'm glad he did, particularly because I talked about that back when she filed this frivolous lawsuit. Had he not dismissed it on the basis of frivolity, it would have been interesting to see where he went with that.)
Click to expand...

She sued American Airlines and some security company prior to this, they settled with her. This used to be called - "Getting a piece of the rock."

She has sued 3 or so other times on this matter.
The judge called her claim "cynical". Disgusting.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread424507/pg1
 
Last edited:
Both Gallop and her baby were hit by debris and suffered head and brain injuries.
Click to expand...
In her case, it sounds like the part of the brain for critical thinking and reason had been destroyed.
 
LashL said:
I thought I heard someone calling my name... (jhunter's invocations work every time!)

Just got the document from PACER, and will post it as soon as I read it and host it.

ETA: Okay, let's see if this works. (Googlepages have moved so I'm not entirely sure if this link will work)

http://sites.google.com/site/resipsa2006/gallop


See if that works. If not, let me know.
Click to expand...
Thank you oh Goddess of Legaltainment. It hath brought much laughter and merriment to a dull morning. I shall sacrifice many copies of the legal pleading template in your honor.
 
Hilarious.

I see that Mustapha Ndanusa was mentioned as appearing on behalf of Gallop, the very same attorney that represented Javed Iqbal in his trial for distributing Hezbollah TV programming and also in his spurious attempt to sue FBI Director Robert Mueller and former Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Not a pretty track record there.
 
Last edited:
Even assuming the factual allegations of the complaint are true, Gallop's claims are not plausible. It is simply not plausible that the Vice President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, and other high-ranking officials conspired to facilitate terrorist attacks that would result in the deaths of thousands of Americans. If anything, the allegations are the product of cynical delusion and fantasy.
Click to expand...


Nice admission there. He "judges" based on incredulity, regardless of facts. You're truly doomed. A Banana Republic that doesn't even produce Bananas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom