Page #281 is showing a remarkable improvement... there's hope for this thread yet
"Beware the Paxemperi, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the joobz-joobz bird, and shun
The frumious kmortis!"
[literary critic]That doesn't rhyme, and I don't think it scans.[/literary critic]
Wait! are you trying to say that catch/kmortis doesn't rhyme? What planet are you from?[literary critic]That doesn't rhyme, and I don't think it scans.[/literary critic]
Pfft! No kidding.You momentarily forgot which thread is, didn't you?
Next thing you'll be expecting evidence for why the NT etceteras eterera'd, etcetera . . .
But only in the humor section.
Nietzsche: "God is dead!"
God: "Nietzsche is dead!p)
Buddha: "I'm stuck here with idiots, so this can't be Nirvana! Drats!"
.
"To do, is to be" -- Socrates
"To be, is to do" -- Nietzsche
"To do, be do, be do" -- Sinatra
.
Who's star was as bright as a gem...There once was a man from Bethlehem...
There once was a man from Bethlehem...
.Who's star was as bright as a gem...
There once was a man from Bethlehem...
Who's star was as bright as a gem...
He slept in the hay ...
There once was a man from Bethlehem...
Who's star was as bright as a gem...
.
He slept in the hay ...
.
To awake with a toast, L'chei-im!For a year and a day...
Yeats for the win.And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
Yeats for the win.
Wait! are you trying to say that catch/kmortis doesn't rhyme? What planet are you from?
What looks to be fulfilled prophecy is evidence but I don't say certain prophecies are proof. When Hoku says this:So why do you bring it {prophecy} into a thread promising evidence?
What looks to be fulfilled prophecy is evidence but I don't say certain prophecies are proof. When Hoku says this:
"Matthew, however, reads the original prophecy literally and invents rodeo Jesus where he is supposedly riding both animals (although I doubt at the same time)."
which I reply to in this post:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5717014#post5717014
she is implying she has proof to state this as a fact, which is not the case as I show in this post:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4618777#post4618777
Her statement is just a skeptic theory but not a proof (that discounts all other possibilities) as she implies.
To the extent that the prophesy is proven it is only evidence that the prophesier prophesied correctly. It tells you nothing about the subject of the prophesy.What looks to be fulfilled prophecy is evidence but I don't say certain prophecies are proof.